Lecture 9 Flashcards

1
Q

What is a Third Party Holder and what are the concerns related to them?

A

A TP Holder is not involved in the initial contract between shipper and carrier and is often unaware of the contract’s contents. Concerns include how they acquire rights/obligations against the carrier (theoretical) and ensuring their protection (practical).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the Presentation Rule regarding Bills of Lading?

A

The right incorporated in a B/L is exclusive to the holder, who must present and surrender the B/L to the carrier to claim delivery. This applies even to straight B/Ls. Usually, there are multiple originals (3), and once delivery is made against one, the others are void.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How does the Conclusive Evidence Rule apply under Hague Rules and Visby Protocol?

A

Under Hague Rules (Art. 3.4), the B/L is prima facie evidence of goods received as described. Under the Visby Protocol, proof to the contrary is not admissible if transferred to a TP Holder acting in good faith.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What cases demonstrate the Conclusive Evidence Rule in action?

A

Damco / Meister (2003): Fraudulent B/Ls issued; TP Holder successfully claimed against the carrier.

Peter Cremer GmbH v General Carriers SA (The Dona Mari, 1974): Clean B/L issued despite moisture damage noted in Mate’s Receipts; carrier liable to TP Holder.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the rules on freight under HVR, Hamburg Rules, and Rotterdam Rules?

A

Hague-Visby Rules: No provisions on freight.

Hamburg Rules (Art. 16.4): Carrier cannot claim freight from TP Holder unless stated as ‘freight collect’.

Rotterdam Rules (Art. 42): Carrier can claim freight unless noted as ‘freight prepaid’.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

When does a TP Holder become liable under COGSA 1992 (UK)?

A

TP Holder becomes liable if they:

Take delivery of goods.

Demand delivery of goods.

Make a claim under the contract of carriage.

The holder’s liability does not erase the shipper’s liability (s. 3.3).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What cases illustrate Holder Liability?

A

Borealis v Stargas (The Berge Sisar, 2001): ‘Taking delivery’ means full and voluntary transfer of possession; ‘making a claim’ is narrowly interpreted.

The Ithan: Demanding security is not considered ‘making a claim’.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How do Jurisdiction Clauses apply to TP Holders?

A

Clauses must be a real agreement (EU Brussels I Regulation).

If TP Holder ‘steps into the shoes’ of the shipper, the clause applies if validly agreed. Otherwise, a direct agreement is required (Coreck Maritime case).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How does Civil Law view TP Holders?

A

Under Civil Law, a TP Holder becomes a party to the contract of carriage (contractual position). The statutory position grants TP Holders rights and obligations for efficiency.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the UK Law approach to TP Holders under Bills of Lading Act 1855 and COGSA 1992?

A

The Acts create a contractual situation for TP Holders.

Section 2(1): Lawful holder acquires all rights of suit as if they were a party to the contract.

Lawful holder must be correctly acquired (regelmatige houder) and act in good faith (rechtmatige houder).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly