Lecture 8: Psychology of Brands Flashcards
Why are symbols (including logos) powerful?
- Symbols (including logos) are powerful because:
o They can be used to represent an infinite number of concepts
o We perceive them quickly and effortlessly
How can a logo be a “double-edged sword”?
o A strong logo can mean that people don’t want it to change
♣ People become very attached to the logo over time (like it and used to it)
♣ E.g. USyd changed its logo in 2010
• Huge protests to the change
• Controversial
How can logos be highly important in cultivating brand awareness?
o Activate associations with a particular brand (e.g. an apple logo = the brand ‘Apple’)
o Imbue concepts into the logo
What is the effectiveness of using colour dependent on?
- Effectiveness of using colour depends on context
o E.g. Basic colours in cluttered vs. uncluttered environments
♣ Colour stands out more in clutter (doesn’t stand out in uncluttered environments)
o E.g. When the iPod came out, Apple used white cords to complete with all the MP3 players on the market as they all used black cords (made the Apple cord stand out)
What are the two important aspects of names in branding?
- Sound symbolism
- Fluency
What is sound symbolism?
o Marketers try to align sounds to their brand/product (e.g. hard vs. soft sounding names)
o Spoken words conjure up images even if the words themselves have no meaning
o Demonstration by Wolfgang Köhler: maluma and takete
♣ Even when talking about nonsensical names (‘maluma’ and ‘takete’), we know which shape that name reflects
• ‘Maluma’ (curvy, smooth shape) and ‘takete’ (hard, pointy, sharp shape)
• Able to match rounded words to rounded shapes and hard words to hard shapes
What is fluency?
o The extent to which a name is easy to pronounce
What are the 3 properties of fluent words/names?
♣ Short names
♣ Share sounds and letters that are usually a combination in the English language
♣ Have simple letter strings
How can word/name fluency confer advantages?
- We evaluate things with fluent names more positively
o Things that are not mentally taxing (like an unpronounceable name) are more pleasing to us
o Fluency is like a halo effect – we seem to use fluency as a heuristic to make judgements about stimuli
♣ Tend to believe that fluent stimuli are more familiar, more likeable, more famous, more intelligent and more true than similar but less-fluent stimuli
The Alter and Oppenheimer (2006), study looking at whether people could predict stock performance using fluency, found what?
o Study 1 (fabricated/fake stock names): Participants expected stocks with fluent names to outperform stocks with disfluent names
o Study 2 (real shares on the NYSE and AMEX): Fluent stocks outperformed disfluent stocks, but only in the short term
♣ Other factors may play a role (e.g. economics) in the long-term
♣ Effect found to not be due to company size (more resources) or industry
o Study 3: Replicated Study 2 (actual stock performance) results using ticker codes
What did the Alter and Oppenheimer (2006) look into?
o Studied whether people could predict stock performance using fluency
♣ Familiarity – people don’t want to take unnecessary risks (able to take away inherent risk (using fluency) more likely to invest in fluent stocks
Why are logos, colours and names important in branding?
- They provide marketers with multiple routes to increasing brand awareness
o Exposure effect – Repeated exposure to something can increase people’s liking of it over time
o Social proof - When used effectively, they give brands public visibility
o Provides social proof
♣ Seeing other people using and consuming a particular brand (logo seen everywhere), then that provides social proof that it is good (social validation) - When used effectively (good logo, people using it), the brand advertises itself (e.g. Apple)
James (1890) highlighted the link between consumption and the self-concept. What did he say?
o A person is the sum total of the things he/she possesses
What components of brands give them symbolic meanings?
o Values/purpose
o Personality
o E.g. Evidence shows that owners can be matched to the cars they own
The symbolic quality of brands means that we can use them to do what (in relation to the Self)?
- Reflect the self (e.g. “I buy a Prius because I see myself as caring about the environment)
- Signal the self (e.g. “I buy a Prius to show others that I care about the environment)
- Define the self (e.g. “I care about the environment because I bought a Prius”)
o These different kinds of Self functions can be satisfied by brands
From age 12, what do children understand that brands can do?
- From age 12, children understand that brands can signal something about the self
How do 8-year-olds treat brands?
o 8 year-olds treat brands as informational and perceptual cues
♣ Behaviour towards brand is based on how they feel about the brand/product