Lecture 8 human animal relations Flashcards
‘Sociology has been constructed as if nature didn’t matter’
Murphy 1994
Who argues that animal behaviour is meaningless and irrelevant to sociologists since they have no sense of self and don’t act they merely behave due to instinct.
Mead
who argues that the new-found security from animals as a threat generated an increasing concern to protect and preserve wild animals in their natural environment?
Thomas 1983
Thomas 1983 argued that throughout medieval Europe and into the 1500s, people lived a mainly rural existence in close proximity to animals. describe how this was the case?
Animals were taken for granted, very visible and were bound up with survival – they were essential for food, transport, labour and warmth. People often shared where they lived with their animals under their roofs and animal bodies provided heat
what does Thomas 1983 say about dominion and how the enlightenment and more secular ways of thinking were smuggled into old ways of thinking
he argues there was an idea of Christian dominion – sometimes this was constructed as stewardship or in terms of simple domination – this was central to dominant discourse that people had the right to dominate animals since the universe was seen through The Great Chain of Being as a hierarchy from god
The Enlightenment undermined the theological worldview, but this was replaced by a secular version of human dominion. The great chain of being gave way to evolution which ended up meaning basically the same thing through philosophers like Descarte – evolutions doesn’t represent any hierarchy but it was construed in similar ways to the great chain of being – e.g. some species are more highly evolved than others. (Although Darwin never says this.)
how does Thomas 1983 argue industrialisation and urbanisation transform human animal relations?
In the 18th – 19th century industrialisation reduced dependency on animal labour power and urbanisation increased distance between humans and animals. This distance is key in how people started thinking about animals in less economic ways because it gave the opportunity to think about animals in a way less geared up to exploiting them because they weren’t so reliant on them and they could begin to romanticise them. People became more enthusiastic about understanding and respecting them and adopted ‘pets’ and objects of affection which encouraged sentimental attitudes to animals and the formation of animal welfare movements in the mid-late 19th century. Pet keeping was most prevalent amongst the urban middle class – the class that had the least strong direct relationship with animals
according to Thomas 1983 what weakened assumptions about mans uniqueness and what was there a new concern for?
a more scientific understanding of natural history and of animals
and there was a new concern for the suffering of animals and the environment - instead of destroying forests and uprooting all plants without practical value, people began to plant trees and flowers for emotional satisfaction and some animals were protected who had no utility. It began to be seen that every species had a purpose and were useful in different ways.
where did Thomas 1983 see a contrast in perceptions of animals?
some animals were thought of aesthetic and beautiful, whilst farm animals were bred to be most useful and as objects of profit not beauty.
Who said there were moral objections to the treatment of animals as the threat from wild animals retreated. Meat eating became seen by some as unnecessary rather than essential and science showed how men could have been vegetarian originally and aspects of the bible agreed men should not murder animals and some thought that meat eating symbolised man’s fallen condition?
Thomas 1983
Thomas 1983 argued that attitudes emerged towards the natural world that were incompatible with the direction in which English society was moving. For example; the growth of towns led to longing for the countryside and the new-found security from wild animals generated an increasing concern to protect wild animals and preserve them in their natural state.
Economic independence from animal labour and urban isolation from animal farming had nourished…
..emotional attitudes which were hard to reconcile with the exploitation of animals by which most people living. An increasingly sentimental view of animals does not jostle well in a world where the elimination of pests and breeding of animals for slaughter grows more and more efficient.
what does Goldsmith argue?
that people pity and eat the objects of their compassion. Children today eat animals and are protected by medicine developed by animal experiments and take toy animals to bed. For adults, nature parks are a fantasy which enshrine the values by which society as a whole cannot live by
what did Thomas 1993 say about cruel actions towards animals?
that they had a functional purpose of placing a distance between animals and humanity - it established them as a distinctive other
according to Franklin 1999 what did pet keeping encourage the middle classes to do?
form optimistic conclusions about animal intelligence and create a psychological foundation that some animals were entitled to moral consideration
what does Franklin 1999 say about Thomas 1983?
that Thomas overemphasizes role of urbanisation since the rural/urban division was not so clear cut and animals continued to have utilitarian uses in urban areas such as horses for transport
What does Franklin 1999 argue about ontological insecurity and risk?
he argues in the 20th century, the main causes of change was ontological insecurity and risk. The loss of faith in the stability of the social basis of identity and the ability to construct a meaningful life led people to suffer at the hands of issues such as job and housing insecurity, higher divorce rates and loss of community. He argued people responded to this by developing relationships with pets which provided a sense of security, stability and pleasure. People are less bound to each other by moral ties of the family, community and class and this is why people are developing increasingly empathetic relationships with animals in late modernity. Arguably ontological insecurity is becoming worse in industrial society because life becomes more unstable (Beck – risk society)
who argues that animals have often become substituted love objects in single person households and childless partnerships. The non-humanity of pets is what makes the relationship reliable and trust worthy – a dog can’t let you down like a person can and providing for something that needs care is rewarding. and how many households have a pet?
Franklin 1999
1 in 2 households now have a pet
what does Franklin 1999 say about animals as a source of anxiety?
Animals in contemporary societies are often a source of anxiety and associated with various risks for example food scares about infected meat, zoonotic diseases such as swine flu, anxiety about endangered species and concerns for animal welfare. Furthermore, anxiety arises from humanity being increasingly seen in a critical way, as a destructive species, damaging the environment and other species and the spread of this attitude promotes a less human-centred perception of animals.
According to Franklin 1999 what has the 20th century done to human associations with animals?
• The 20th century has added a more legal and institutionalised apparatus concerned with animal welfare and has changed the economic, political and cultural face of human associations with animals. This has led to shifts in attitudes toward intensive animal food production, for example growing concern for the welfare of intensively farmed animals who are increasingly recognised as sentient beings and this has led to increasing regulation. This is represented in the dramatic rise of vegetarianism and animal welfare/ rights movements.
Franlin 1999 argues that during the earlier part of the 20th century modernisation privileged human progress and so there were prices to pay for the greater human good, what were they? and what happened after the 1960’s?
animal exploitation, extinction and experimentation.
After the 1960’s this compromise began to fall apart. Relations with animals were revised in a series of pro-animal movements and changes in the ways humans involved animals in their lives.
According to Franklin 1999 how was Fordism a marker of change in the modernisation of human animal relations?
since the arrival of cheap motorised transport removed the need for horse drawn carriages which was the last instrumental relationship with animals people had in their lives
According to Franklin 1999 what had the greatest impact on human animal relations and why?
Generalised affluence and mass popular culture had the greatest impact since it produced more free time and the conditions for leisure cultures. E.g. as the amount of annual leave grew so did opportunities for trips to outdoor locations and activities involving animals like horse riding. Also, higher wages supported pet keeping.
What does Burnett 1996 say?
that throughout the western world, meat eating was a key register of social progress.
What does Franklin 1999 say about meat eating?
Meat eating grew dramatically from the last quarter of the 19th century from intensive animal rearing developments and improvements and improvements in freezing technologies that permitted long distance exports. This meant contact with animals in terms of their dead flesh hugely increased. However, alongside this increased meat consumption came an increased distaste for the process of slaughter and butchery which has led to the popular presentation of meat as hardly recognisable as an animal carcass.
Meat was a food strongly recommended by governments and health authorities in all western countries. Vegetarianism was considered eccentric in this period.