Lecture 8 Flashcards

0
Q

Regression

A

sound gets “worse”

as they learn more words they seem to get worse at producing certain sounds

down and stone

later, new oral vowel nasal words: instead of producing the initial consontate

nasal assimilation: take properties of one sound in a word and mush it onto later part of the word - assimilation of sounds at the end: meeeans (minz) instead of beans and nance (naens) instead of dance

“took over” more accurate forms

what’s going on: as they’re learning more words they’re overdoing similar across word patterns, figuring out how much they can change words and still have them be similar to the adult for (nown (naewn) for down and known (non) for stone)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

issues in acquiring your language’s sound system

A
  • not simple adding on of perfectly-prononunced words
  • sometimes pronunciations change for the better or worse (saying r’s for w’s)
  • sounds can show up on some words, but not on others (rocket vs. bwead for bread)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

progressive phonological idiom

A

some words are accurate “too early”

child doesn’t produce sound “h” except in “hi” and “hello”

can’t say horse, hose, hamster: ‘orse. ‘ose, ‘amster

explanation: maybe there is no “h” they’re just learning entire word forms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

child as a problem solver: how do I sound like the people around me?

A
  • avoidance of difficult sounds (Sedaris avoiding “s” sounds)
  • exploit sounds you like
  • replacement of one sound with another: simplifying the information of the word: less info that you need to control motorally (wew vs. well)
  • rearrangement of sounds in words (pasketti instead of spaghetti)
  • one word, or approximate whole phrase
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

biological constraints

A

much easier to physically produce stop consonants than fricatives (dah vs. zah)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

perceptual feedback

A

can’t do much if you don’t have an acoustic model from adults and internal feedback

need an acoustic model and internal feedback (that doesn’t quiet match what i hear in my head): error signal

e.g. if you’re hearing impaired, only get external feedback

internal feedback: immediate, running into an electric fence

external feedback = temporally delayed (time in between producing the sound and then relying on other person to give you feedback), poison oak (takes a day or so to show up, but doesn’t effectively teach you to avoid the plant because it’s not immediate - you don’t necessarily know where you got this horrible blistering rash)

internal reward for sounding like those around you

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

age 3 progressions

A

vowels and many consonants

tought consonants: r, l , v, th, dth

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

should be intelligible by….

A

4

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

by age 8 progression

A

slower speech rate

mostly adultlike

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

describing kids’ pronunciations

A
  • rules to translate adult form into kid form: e.g. “delete /s/ in clusters” = noman instead of snowman
  • constraints: e.g. avoid consonant clusters entirely
  • preferred forms as templates: consonant vowel consonant

make sense of seemingly unrelated erros

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

caveat to describing kids’ pronunciations

how to fix?

A

what we hear is filtered through our own phonological system!

maybe if we use fine grained analyses we can get around that

need for multiple measurements of the same word at a give age (kids gradually add in correct sounds)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

inherent variability

cuation in mispronunciation

A

referential style: one word at a time

expressive style: fluent speech that is less intelligible

regional variants: define correctness by dialect being acquired: are they learning the dialect they’re exposed to?

variants in contexts: reading list vs. casual conversation
-

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

kids pronunciations: things that are tough for kids

A

consonant clusters
- closed syllables are hard

coda (end of syllables) consonants

long words

initial weak syllables - guitar is hard, they’ll say tar instead

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

place assimilation example

A

gog for dog

tat for cat

putting end consonant in front

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

assimilation in adult speech

A

lean bacon to leambacon

green peas –> greempeaz (grimpiz)

NOT an error just fluent speech

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Word templates

A

model of what a word should sound like aka canonical forms

between 5-100 words, most are variants on a few templates, plus a few isolated phonological idioms

similar adult words that are performed by child from same template: fish and fetch come out as the same word

RULES change adult words to fit template

16
Q

How much of this production from children has to do with NOT UNDERSTANDING?

A

very little

a few adult sounds are confusable, but not that many (f, ø)

generally kids are good at discriminating contrast of native language

even for weak stress, they can hear syllables

  • if they’re not paying attention to those weak syllables it shouldn’t matter
    - find was dog for me (confusion!)
    - find the dog for me (no confusion)