Lecture 7: Multilateral Aid Flashcards
Multilateral aid: Benefits
- appropriate way to address global issues
- political neutrality and legitimacy
- global presence
- economies of scale
- governance based on global development principles and standards
- abundant knowledge resources
- low transaction costs
multilateral organizations: definition
international institutions with governmental membership which conduct all or a significant part of their activities in favor of development of aid recipient countries
multilateral ODA definition
official, core contributions to ODA eligible multilateral organizations, either negotiated, assessed or voluntary
multilateral aid: inflows x outflows
o inflows: contributions of official bilateral donors to multilateral organizations
o outflows: aid activities financed from multilateral development institutions’ regular (core) budgets
o MOs mostly financed by official bilateral donors, few of them generate own resources
evolvement of MOs
• differently-oriented MOs have been created in different decades, reflecting the reaction of international community to current global problems
aid provided to X channeled through MOs
- *Core funding**
- *(= multilateral ODA):**
un-earmarked contributions to MOs, to common pools
Non-core funding (= multi-bi):
contributions to MOs earmarked for a specific region, country, theme or project by the donor
technically qualifies as bilateral ODA
Multilateral development finance
increasing in volumes and as a share of total ODA.
total ODA to MOs (core and non-core) increased.
MOs offer a variety of financing instruments (grants, loans, debt forgiveness, bonds, reimbursable grants, equities etc.)
non-core funding frowing faster
• Especially earmarked funding growing in volume and as a share of total funding to multilateral organizations: “à la carte” multilateralism
Bilateral donors -Advantages of non-core funding:
- greater visibility of individual donor’s contribution, allows for greater support for dev. assistance among the constituency at home
- easier monitoring of the use of contribution
- can be focused on specific sector, region, country where the donor has no presence or lacks expertise
MOs -Advantages of non-core funding
- still a welcome additional funding for MOs
- could help to sustain or broaden the MO’s activities
Disadvantages:
• may weaken established governance mechanism by bypassing board decisions
increases transaction costs (e.g. reporting requirements)
may conflict with MO’s core policies and strategies
Developing countries -Advantages of non-core funding
better harmonization compared to bilateral aid
Disadvantage: might blur lines of accountability
Emerging earmarked funding mechanisms
share of earmarked funding growing also due to the growing number of vertical funds and other earmarked funding mechanisms
examples of vertical funds:
o The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (GFATM)
country-specific multi-donor trust funds (MDTFs): i.e. post-tsunami trust fund in Indonesia
funds being administered mostly by MOs, e.g. WB, UNDP, WHO etc.
financial mechanisms – not implementing agencies
potential to strengthen national ownership, reduce transaction costs, attract financing from new sources, focus on goal-based strategies
are successful in mobilizing financing from non-DAC providers, esp. from private sources
vertical funds very innovative in their business models and approaches to development challenges, but often rely on parallel co-ordination structures
MO trends 3 biggest recipient sectors
Infrastructure, production, social
Donor’s abuse of MOs
some donors’ practices are undermining the performance of MOs:
o multilateral funding decisions dispersed across numerous governmental entities => co-ordination difficult, reducing the strategic focus and coherence of allocations
o contributions to one MO can come from different ministries or departments
o increasing volatility of funding, funding to individual MOs varies
o MOs more reliant on non-core funding more vulnerable, undermining the planning processes
o unsustainable accountability processes, some MOs being assessed numerous times a year
MO system challenges
large number of MOs due to inability of nation states to solve global problems and inability of international community to abolish institutions with overlapping agendas:
o lack of co-ordination, duplication of activities => threatening effectiveness of aid
o increased administrative burden for recipient countries
o accountability issues
overlapping agendas of MOs caused also by insufficient financing →to attract more resources from bilateral donors, MOs are broadening their focus areas outside their original purpose
ineffective bureaucracies, cumbersome administrative systems of MOs
low effectiveness in reaching the set goals
high salaries, not respecting local salary levels
technocratic top-down approaches
lack of transparency