Lecture 7 - Epidemiology Flashcards

1
Q

Risk Perception

A

Smoke: controlable, observeable
HIV: controllable but non-observable
Smog/pollution: uncontrollable but observable
Pesticides: uncontrollable and unobservable
People say uncontrollable and unobsevable are most dangerous when really controllable and observable toxins are most dangerous=SMOKING

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Lancet Study on the Burden of Disease

A
-huge study that identified 20 leading risk factors to disease
Major cause was hypertension
In terms of tox:
2--> tobacco
3--> alcohol 
4-->household pollutions
Thus toxicant expsoure is important
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

The Black Death (1300)

A

-killed 50% people, lasted few years, RATS
Ergot fungus was teh cause; grew on rye
Acute High dose: convulsions, mania, halluciamntions
Chronic low dose: gangrene due to peripheral vasoconstriction
“St Anthony’s Fire”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Chimney sweeps

A

1775: higher incidence of scrotal cancer
Soon: had to bathe at every shift

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Cholera

A

1854
Due to water contamination in certain London villages
When well was closed, cholera diseappeared

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Great Smog of London

A

-they were burning coal in fireplace; rose up and caused severe pollution
4000 deaths and many more after
What is in air? Suflur dioxide, co2, NO
—> excess deathwas duel to suflur dioxide. The coal was low quality with high suflur content
SO2 is a airway irritant and NO as well
CO2 is an asphyxiant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Framingham Heart Study

A

Prospective cohort study
>1 risk factor can go from 5-50%
Understands risk factors in CVS disease

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Methods to evaluate toxins

A

Case control: outcome –> expsoure (you have the disease already)
Cohort: exposure –> outcome
Ex: Framingham study: follow people in life exposed to same factors, diet etc, and saw that the outcome was heart disease

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Odds ratio

A

For case control study
The ratio os risk of disease in exposed vs unexposed
OR=2: exposed had 2x the risk as unexposed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Standardized Mortality Ratio

A

Like odds ratio (exposed/unexposed) but now its risk of death, NOT disease
SMR=150 –> 50% higher chance of death due to thsi exposure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Relative Risk

A

Ratio of disease in exposed/unexposed population

RR=175 –> 75% increase in risk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

1948 Study on Chula Vista Landfill and Greenwood Landfill

A

Study on 2 diff landfills and the health of the population living thereall kinds of chemicals dumped there

1950: houses built over it
1995: concluded no correlation b/w landfill areas and disease

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Hierarchy of Data

A

Meta-analysis (systematic review) > randomized trials > cohort > case-control > cross-sectional

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Study: the effect of diesel exhaust in miners

A

-retrospective cohort study (as opposed to Framingham=prospective)
Comparing workers exposed and not exposed to diesel exhaust
====> lung cancer
Case control study showed non-smokers with highest expsoure 7x mor likely to die
Cohort study showed lung cancer among exposed group was 5x higher
THIS ALLOWED DIESEL EXAHSUDT TO CLASSIFY AS HUMAN CARCINOGEN

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly