Lecture 7 Flashcards

1
Q

What kind of probabilities are involved in decision under risk (DUR)?

A

Ones that are objectively given, known and agreed upon

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

See

A

Notation top of notes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What do prospects under risk do?

A

They map probabilities to outcomes (deals) which are called probability-contingent prospects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Define DUR?

A

In DUR, an objective probability measure P is given on the state space S, assigning each event E with its probability P(E) and R is the outcome set

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Define prospects?

A

Probability distributions over outcomes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What would make different state-contingent prospects preferentially equivalent?

A

If they generate the same probability distribution over outcomes (eg. If different states/situations result in same outcomes w same probabilities)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

See notes

A

Copper example - outcomes not state dependent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

When can you apply De Finetti’s theorem to DUR?

A

When objective and subjective probabilities agree

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

See

A

Slide 11 objective vs subjective probability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Define certainty equivalent?

A

Guaranteed amount of return (cash) that would yield the exact same expected utility as a given risky asset

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

See

A

Notes st Petersburg paradox

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Explain st Petersburg paradox?

A

The prospect of the game given by EV equals infinity but the CE is below £5 tf EV doesn’t hold.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What was Bernoulli’s solution to the st Petersburg paradox?

A

He realised that the value of an item depends on the utility it yields rather than the price tf proposed (see notes) leading to EU(g) = ln2

Utility function ln

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How do you then get the CE equivalent of prospect g for st Petersburg paradox?

A

Assume CE is α, and tf α~g, using EU as the representation function of our preference for risk:
EU(α)=EU(g)
U(α)=ln2
Tf α=2=CE (less than 5, this agrees with empirical findings)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

When does expected utility hold for DUR?

A

If and only if there is a strictly increasing utility function u, mapping the outcome to R, such that preferences maximise the EU of prospects defined by: p1u(x1)…pnu(xn)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the utility function EU under risk?

A

It’s the subjective parameter that characterises the decision maker

17
Q

See determining preference example and history bit below

A

Now (notes)

18
Q

What is savage’s point regarding the independence axiom?

A

It doesn’t matter which alternative is chosen under states that yield the same outcome tf those states should be ignored tf decision makers should base decisions entirely on features that differ between alternatives

19
Q

What is the sure-thing principle?

A

Principle that extends EU to uncertainty (rather than just risk)

Idea: if prospect a is preferred to b, if they have one outcome that is equal a given state, it won’t affect this preference relationship if that outcome is changed equally for both a and b (see diagram)

See slide 27