Lecture 7 Flashcards
Mergers
between two equals
Acquisitions = takeovers
Friendly takeover
Hostile takeover
Hostile takeover
Refers to the acquisition of one company by another corporation against the wishes of the target companys management
Friendly takeover
The takeover bid was made with the approval of the acquirer and target company management and board of directors
Hostile takeovers extensive
Hostile bidder may reap the benefit of taking over an under performing company
Hostile takeover can be very costly for the bidder (HART 1995)
Identification and bidding costs
Competition from white knight
Competition from incumbent management
White knight
A person or a company that saves a company from hostile takeover or collapse
Takeover defence machnisms (us)
In the US, there are more statutory defence mechanism embedded in corporate charters
Incumbent managements tool kits include:
Poison pills: to issue extra shares at discount to existing shareholders
Greenmail: to repurchase company shares at a premium (requires supermajority for merger)
Golden parachute
Staggered board
Supermajority requirement for charter amendments
Companies tend to use financial defense against hostile takeovers
Pay dividend
Update financial forecast
Disposal or revaluation of assets
Invite a white knight
Merger and acquisition waves
1) horizontal mergers
2) vertical mergers
3) conglomerate, diversification
4) hostile takeovers
5) cross-border mergers
6)private equity, leverage biyout
7) BRICS countries taking the lead
Merger and acquisitions
Economic rationales of the bidder
To exploit synergy effect, economies of scale
To create/enforce market power
-Vertical or horizontal M&A
-Antitrust regulations makes it harder to achieve
To discipline and replace incompetent management
-Through hostile takeovers
Mainly happened in 1980s
Creative destruction
-Driven by technological advancements, deregulation in the markets
To diversify portfolio
-More than half ended in failure
-Only 17% created more value
To acquire expertise and/or brand name
-Often used by chinese companies when expanding abroad
To save tax
Incentives of the managers
CEO of the acquiring company
Often motivated by empire building and (enourmous) ego
-quite often pay high premium at the cost of shareholders
Incentives of the managers
CEO of the target company
Reluctant to accept
-Either for his own job security considerations
-Or in the interest of the company
-Potential measures normal
Proxy contests
When a group of shareholders are presuaded to join forces and gather enough shareholder proxies to battle the incumbent management
Very costly and no guaranteed success
Hardly used for discipline excessive executive compensation
Mainly used in the context of merger and acquisitions
Shareholder proposals
A more modest form of proxy protest
Fairly cheap but usually not binding
Can be effective if the board accommodates the proposals
Beneficiaries of M&A
On average premium that acquirers pay for target ranges from 20-30% or higher
-Share price of target companies mostly immediately increase at announcement
-Sometimes the acquirers share price also increase after announcement
But the empirical evidence about value gain from M&A is mixed
It benefits the target shareholders the most