Lecture 6: Language Developement 2 Flashcards

1
Q

When does word production start?

A

Around 12 months

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

When does the vocabulary spurt occur?

A

Between 18 and 24 months

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is a vocabulary spurt?

A

An arbitrary mapping between a sound and a concept

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Three explanations of the vocabulary spurt?

A

Sound
Concept
Mapping

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Segmentation of speech

(Plunkett, 1993) coded utterances as containing what three things?

A
  • target lexemes
  • sub-lexical forms (SLFs)
  • formulaic expressions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are target lexemes?

A

Words

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are sub-lexical forms?

A

Undershooting solutions ( -raffe, -at of giraffe and that)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are formulaic expressions?

A

Overshooting solutions (wassat, gimme)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How many words does a 6 yr old have?

A

13,000

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What did plunkett (1993) find?

A

That the vocabulary spurt was closely related to solution of speech segmentation problem

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Categorisation of objects:

Gopnik and Meltzoff (1987) found what?

A

A relationship between the age at which a productive naming spurt was seen and the emergence of ‘advanced object sorting’ skills

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What did Gopnik and Meltzoff argue?

A

That the vocabulary spurt reflects the understanding that all things belong in categories.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Meints, plunkett&harris (1999) found that:
At 12 months:
At 18 and 24 months:

A
  • infants concepts only include typical referents (dog, bird, car)
  • both typical and atypical referents are included in their concepts of words (pug, ostrich, racing car)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Naming insight: what did McShane (1979) argue?

A

That the vocabulary spurt reflects the child’s discovery of how language works (realise that all things can and should have names)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What did Kamhi (1986) suggest?

A

That childrens realisation that all things should have names, is an observable developmental phenomenon

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Quine’s (1960) mapping problem: gavagai- what could it refer to? (The disambiguation problem)

A

The whole, part of it, the colour, its name, how it is moving, something else entirely?

17
Q

4 Solutions to the mapping problem:

A

A- syntactic bootstrapping
B- constraints on word meanings
C- the social pragmatic approach
D- the associative learning approach

18
Q

What is syntactic bootstrapping?

A

When pre-school children use sentence context to infer the meanings of words (count nouns, mass nouns, proper nouns, adjectives, verbs- dockrell and mcshane, 1990)

19
Q

What is a count noun? (Katz et al, 1974)

A

‘This is a X’

20
Q

What is a mass noun? (Brown, 1985)

A

This is some X

21
Q

What is a proper noun? (Gelman, 1984)

A

This is X

22
Q

What is an adjective? (Smith et al, 1992)

A

This is a X one/ this is very X

23
Q

What are constraints on word meanings?

A

They are when children make assumptions about new words’ meanings as they are equipped with a set of word learning biases and constraints (markman, 1989)

24
Q

Some hypothesised constraints:

A

25
Q

An example constraint: the whole object principle

What is the behaviour?

A
  • the beh: children apply new words to whole objects, rather than to salient properties of objects
26
Q

An example of a constraint: mutual exclusivity bias

Behaviour:

A

Behaviour: children apply new words to objects without names, rather than to objects that already have names

27
Q

Is mutual exclusivity innate or learned? (Halberda, 2003)

A

There is evidence of the bias at 16 months, but not 14 or 15 months

Younger infants looked more at the ‘name known’ image

28
Q

Is mutual exclusivity bias a result of infants’ experience with language? (Houston-price, caloghiris and raviglione, 2012)

What is there still to consider?

A

Monolingual infants have lots of experience of things having just one name

But bilingual children who hear more than one lang?

29
Q

What did Houston-Price et al (2010) do/ find?

A
  • compared mono and bilingual children
  • finding that children in monolingual families had increased looks towards an unfamiliar object: showing that the language we hear teaches us HOW to learn words
30
Q

What does the social pragmatic approach assume?

A

That word learning occurs in situations of joint attention (JA)

31
Q

In what 2 ways might JA solve the mapping problem?

A
  1. Adult speaker ‘follows-in’ on child’s focus of attention (labels object that is already attending to)
  2. Infant switches focus to match adult speaker’s focus (attaches label to object attended to by adult)
32
Q

What are infants able to do by 18 months?

A

Infants attach new words to objects at the focus of the speaker’s attention and will attach a new word to the object looked at by the speaker not the object the infant was looking at when they heard the word.

33
Q

What does the associative learning approach assume?

A

That infants use general learning mechanisms (eg attention and memory) and the statistical variation of words and their referents to discover words’ meanings

34
Q

What did smith and yu (2008) find?

A

That 12-14 month old infants showed evidence of ‘cross-situational learning’.