Lecture 6 - Groups Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Define groups

A

“A group is 2 or more individuals in face-to-face interaction, each aware of his/her membership in the group, each aware of the others who belong to the group, and each aware of their positive interdependence as they strive to achieve mutual goals”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the 4 group classifications identified by Hamilton & Sherman (1996)?

A
  1. Intimacy
  2. Task
  3. Social categories
  4. Loose associations
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the group properties identified by Johnson & Johnson (1987)?

A
  • A collection of individuals who are interacting with one another
  • A social unit of 2 or more individuals who perceive themselves as belonging to a group
  • A collection of individuals who are interdependent
  • A collection of individuals who join together to achieve a goal
  • A collection of individuals who are trying to satisfy a need through their joint association
  • A collection of individuals whose interactions are structured by a set of roles and norms.
  • A collection of individuals who influence each other
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Who suggested that people fear public speaking more than heights, darkness and death?

A

Borden (1980) people fear public speaking more than heights, darkness and death

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Describe Zajonc’s drive theory of social facilitation

A

The presence of others automatically produces arousal, which ‘drives’ dominant responses. Performance is improved by a ‘correct’ dominant response, but is impaired by an ‘incorrect’ dominant response

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Explain Markus (1978) dressing experiment

A

Ppts dressed in their own clothing (easy task) or in unfamiliar clothing (difficult task). They dressed either alone, with an incidental audience present or with an attentive audience present. Evaluation apprehension occurred on the easy task: only the attentive audience reduced the time taken to dress. There was a drive effect on the difficult task: both incidental and attentive audiences increased the time taken to dress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Detail social facilitation revisited

A
  • Meta analysis of 241 studies involving 24,000 participants found that mere presence accounts for 0.3-3% of variance in behaviour (Bond & Titus, 1983)
  • Performance of male skateboarders was very significantly affected by the presence of an attractive woman – performance was improved but there was also many more crashes (Ronay & Von Hipple, 2010)
  • Eating behaviour is influenced by the relationship with those present, e.g., friends, family members, strangers (Herman, et al. 2003)
  • The presence of a ‘virtual human’ has exactly the same effect as the presence of a real human (Park & Catrambone, 2012)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Describe Festinger et al., 1950 field of forces

A

They believed that a field of forces, based on attraction and goal mediation, acts on individual group members to render the group more or less cohesive, and that cohesiveness influences membership continuity and adherence to group norms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Describe group cohesion

A

A dynamic process reflected in the tendency for a group to stick together and remain united in the pursuit of its instrumental objectives and/or the satisfaction of member affective needs”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the formula for Steiner’s 1972 group effectiveness framework?

A

actual productivity = potential productivity - group process losses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the taxonomy of groups?

A
  1. Is the task divisible or unitary?
  2. Is it a maximising or optimising task?
  3. How are individual inputs related to the group’s product?
  • Additive – sum of individual inputs
  • Compensatory – average of individual inputs
  • Disjunctive – select one individual input
  • Conjunctive – group product = worst individual input
  • Discretionary – group is free to decide
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the stages of the linear perspective?

A

forming, storming, norming, performing, adjourning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Detail the forming stage of the learning perspective?

A

This is where people get to know each other, and the task at hand. What are everyone’s strengths, weaknesses? When can they be relied upon and when not? What quirks do our fellow team members have? What are we working towards and why?
At this stage people avoid conflict and “play nice” with each other because they want to be accepted into the group. The group is learning about the objectives and goals - getting a feel for the work that must be done together. People tend to focus on practical details - who, what, when and where and work reasonably independently at this stage - while they learn where they and everyone else fits into the team.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Detail the storming stage of the learning perspective?

A

As people begin to feel safer, they will push the boundaries set up by the team in the forming stage - and conflicts may begin to erupt. Clashes occur due to different personalities and differences in working styles - the ways things get done. Resentments and irritations that were buried in the last stage erupt and negatively effect the team’s performance.
The team must come together to decide how to move forwards and solve the inevitable challenges and misunderstandings that come out as the task progresses. People are competing, but beginning to open up to each other too. As they do this, the team begins to establish how they will work together going forwards.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Detail the norming stage of the learning perspective?

A

Norming is where the plan comes together. During this stage the team agrees the plan, timelines and who should contribute what to the plan according to their skills. Some team members may need to let go of ‘their’ ideas and make sacrifices for the greater good of the team. Also, team members begin to clearly see others’ strengths and accept their weaknesses.
The team will also be developing trust - helping each other and asking for help, and many teams are socialising with each other by this stage. Storming can still occur - especially when there is change or stress on the team, but in general the team is beginning to work effectively.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Detail the performing stage of the learning perspective?

A

In short, the team is now performing. The team is stable and the goals are clear. The team has developed processes that work for the team and people follow them. Performing teams get the job done with minimal supervision and conflict. People are motivated and competently get the job done. Conflicts are no longer threatening and different perspectives are seen as valuable. When a team fully meets this stage, it is a high-performing team.

17
Q

Detail the adjourning stage of the learning perspective?

A

Bruce Tuckman teamed up with Mary Ann Jensen in 1977 to add a fifth stage - adjourning, sometimes called mourning. This stage is about wrapping up the task and the team breaking up. It may be a difficult stage for some team members who enjoy the routine, or who have made good friendships. A leader can help by working with team members to plan their futures and what comes next.

18
Q

Describe Gerard & Matthewson, 1966 initiation study

A

Group attractiveness as a function of severity of electric shock and initiation status of the shock. Cognitive dissonance and the effectiveness of initiation rites. Ppts about to join a boring group discussion were given a mild or severe electric shock. When the shock was billed as an initiation, ppts given the severe shock rated the group as more attractive than ptts given the mild shock

19
Q

Outline the model of the process of group socialisation (Moreland & Levine, 1982)

A

The passage of an individual member through a group is accompanied by variation in commitment and is marked by role discontinuities

20
Q

Describe the Ringelmann effect

A

As the number of people pulling horizontally on a rope increased each person’s exertion was reduced: people pulling in eight-person groups each exerted half the effort of a person pulling alone

21
Q

Describe motivation loss in Ingham’s study 1974

A

As group size increased form 1 to 6, there was a decrease in each person’s output. In pseudo-groups, this is due to reduced effort, that is, motivation loss. In real groups, this is more marked as a result of coordination loss

22
Q

Describe Latane, Williams & Harkins (1979) Social Loafing study

A

Shouting, cheering, clapping Alone and in Groups of 2, 4, 6

Noise produced per person reduced by:

  • 29% in two-person groups
  • 49% in four-person groups
  • 60% in six-person groups
23
Q

How can we reduce social loafing?

A
  • Personal identifiability (Williams, et al. 1981)
  • Personal involvement (Brickner, et al. 1986)
  • Partner effort (Jackson & Harkins, 1985)
  • Intergroup comparisons (Harkins & Szymanski, 1989)
  • Highly meaningful task in association with expectation of poor performance by co-workers (Williams & Karou, 1991)
24
Q

Describe paper tents study by Zaccaro 1984

A

Social compensation: ppts performing a relatively unattractive paper-folding task loafed. Individula productivity was lower in 4 than 2 person groups. For an attractive task, the loafing effect was reserved: individual productivity was higher in 4 person groups than in 2 person groups

25
Q

Describe social roles

A
  1. Division of labour
  2. Indicate how members relate to one another
  3. Give members a place within the group
  • Patterns of behaviour that distinguish between different activities within the group, and that interrelate to one another for the greater good of the group
  • Informal or formal
  • Task or social related
26
Q

Describe Zimbardo’s 1971 study

A
  • 24 psychologically stable male volunteers at Stanford University
  • Randomly assigned to be a guard or a prisoner
  • 2 week study cancelled after 6 days
  • Some guards behaved in a brutal and sadistic manner
  • Some prisoners became docile with severe emotional disturbance
  • Zimbardo explained that they complied with the expected role
  • Haslam and Reicher (2012) argued that uncertainty resulted in an internalisation of the available identity
27
Q

Describe social norms

A
  • “Rules and standards that are understood by members of a group and that guide and/or constrain social behaviour without the force of laws. These norms emerge out of interaction with others; they may or may not be stated explicitly and any sanctions for deviating from them could come from social networks, and not the legal system” (Cialdini & Trost, 1998; p. 152)
  • MacNeil and Sherif (1966) had 3 confederates and 1 participant and established extreme group norms
  • Confederates were gradually replaced
  • Original group norms continued to influence behaviour
28
Q

Describe Newcomb’s 1965 Bennington study: voting preference for 1936 presidential candidates as a function of exposure to liberal norms

A

First year students at Bennington college in the US showed a traditionally conservative voting pattern during the 1936 presidential election, while third and fourth year students, who had been exposed for longer to the college’s liberal norms, showed a significantly more liberal voting pattern