Lecture 6: Concepts and Semantic Memory Flashcards

1
Q

Concept

A

=a mental representation of a category of objects, typically derived from experience

  • efficient way of representing knowledge of the world
  • help us focus n similarities among objects
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How are concepts defined

A

¥ Initial explanations of concepts relied on the idea that we use the notion of ‘essential, common features’
¥ For example, dogs have fur, paws, tails, they bark etc. –rely on essential features
¥ This is problematic though as some concepts defy definition in this way
¥ e.g. Wittgenstein’s problem of defining ‘games’ and ‘sports’
¥ Some concepts have fuzzy boundaries, where they cross over with others, so defining them by essential features is not really workable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q
Prototype model 
(Rosch and Mervis, 1975, Hampton, 2010)
A

¥ A prototype is an abstract idealised representation of the category member. It is defined by the list of attributes we think is characteristic of the category.
¥ Items in any given category differ in their prototypicallity – a robin vs. a penguin

¥ Allows for fuzzy boundaries – if an object shares only a few features with the prototype then it likely shares features with another prototype – e.g. dolphins are fish
¥ People also offer ‘typical’ features rather than essential features. For example – ‘birds fly’ even though some do not, but it is a feature shared by most category members, and is, thus, prototypical (Hampton, 2010).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Family resemblances

A

An object can be classified as belonging to a category when there is a match between it and the prototype. This is called ‘family resemblance’ – that members share attributes / features

some categories show little evidence of family resemblance – goal derived categories, like ‘things to take on holiday’-no family resemblance at all, and yet they are still grouped together (Barsalou, 1985).

Hamilton 1981
-some categories don’t have clear prototypes, concepts such as justice, belief etc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

“Friendship” prototypes

A
¥	Fehr (2004) found that there is a prototype for “friendship intimacy” in same-sex friendships.
¥	Prototypical features of friendship intimacy:
¥	Self-disclosure
¥	Emotional support
¥	Loyalty
¥	Less prototypical features:
¥	Shared activities
¥	Practical support
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Exemplar approach

A

Instead of using an abstract description (e.g. prototype) we make category judgments by comparing new stimuli with instances already stored in memory. The instance stored in memory is the “exemplar”.

  • new exemplars compared with known, most similar item will influence classification the most
  • More able to account for tricky categories like ‘games’, because actual exemplars, not prototypes are used.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Situated nature of concepts

A

¥ Representation of any given concept will vary from situation to situation depending on our current goals and important aspects of situation.
¥ We need to focus on the connections between conceptual, perceptual and
¥ motor/action systems.
¥ There is reasonable evidence to suggest that we access perceptual / situational and motor / action information when we process concepts, there is more to them than simply an abstract representation of the concept itself.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Embodiment of concepts

A
  • Assessing perceptual and motor info when thinking about words, enough to activate relevant area
  • Concepts must store not just abstract but also situational information and what are the possible things that can happen in terms of movement ect
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Hierarchy of concepts

A

Superordinate level
• furniture, animals, tools
Basic level: used most often as most of the time other information is too much/too little
• chairs, dogs, screwdrivers
Subordinate level
• desk chair, collie, Phillips screwdriver

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Hierarchy of concepts

A

Superordinate level
• furniture, animals, tools
Basic level: used most often as most of the time other information is too much/too little
• chairs, dogs, screwdrivers
Subordinate level
• desk chair, collie, Phillips screwdriver

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Spreading activation model

A

¥ Collins and Loftus (1975) suggest that semantic memory is organized on the basis of semantic relatedness (semantic distance).
¥ Whenever we see, hear or think of something appropriate “node” in semantic memory is activated.
¥ That activation spreads strongly to closely related concepts and weakly to distantly related concepts.
¥ Explains the typicality effect – it takes less time to decide that a typical member belongs to a category (e.g. apple – fruit) than a less typical member (e.g. kumquat – fruit)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Schemas

A

¥ Schema is a mental structure we use to organize and simplify our knowledge of the world around us.
¥ We have schemas about ourselves, other people, mechanical devices, food, and in fact almost everything.
¥ They are larger knowledge units than the concepts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Scripts

A

¥ A narrower term than schema and refers to a well structured sequence of events associated with a particular activity.
¥ Scripts could interfere with memory by replacing expected events that were missing from stories.
¥ Western social structure encourages a strong degree of behavioural scripts to be utilized within everyday interactions with others.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Schemas and memory

A

¥ Schemas help us to understand situations – we know how to behave in certain situations because we have a schema for the situation.
¥ They allow us to form expectations and make predictions about a situation.
¥ They can influence our memory of an event as we are more likely to notice things and events that are congruent with a schema.
¥ They help us prevent cognitive overload.
¥ BUT… They can cause various errors in memory and perception

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Stereotypes

A
  • Type of schema
  • Explicit measures- not always reliable because they can be influenced by social desirability bias Association Test have been developed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Stereotype stability

A

¥ Recent research seem to suggest that stereotypes are less stable and invariant over time than originally thought.
¥ Garcia-Marques et al (2006) asked participants to select 5 out of 43 traits that best describe various groups. Then repeated the same task 2 weeks later.
¥ Results reveal considerable variation between the traits selected in test and test 2, especially for traits that are judged to be less typical.
¥ Stereotype activation is flexible and dependent on context.

17
Q

Stereotype stability

A

¥ Recent research seem to suggest that stereotypes are less stable and invariant over time than originally thought.
¥ Garcia-Marques et al (2006) asked participants to select 5 out of 43 traits that best describe various groups. Then repeated the same task 2 weeks later.
¥ Results reveal considerable variation between the traits selected in test and test 2, especially for traits that are judged to be less typical.
¥ Stereotype activation is flexible and dependent on context.

18
Q

Brewer and Treyens (1981)
Memory for objects in a room

A

Participants were 30 university students, who arrived individually to the laboratory and were asked to wait in an office.
After waiting for some time, participants were taken out of the office and asked to write down everything they could remember from the room.
Results
Most participants recalled the schematic objects (desk, typewriter)
Some participants reported things that would be expected in office but were not present (phone, books)
Many participants also recalled the skull (not as predicted by schema theory)