Lecture 6/7 - Aging and Exercise Flashcards
__% gain in fitness = __ year reduction in chronological age
1%
1
Reduction of power after age 65 is ~__x as much as muscle alone
~ 2x
- loss of independence
~age ___, ____ loss accelerates
70
VO2max
Attribution of Strength Gains among Elderly
@ 60% 1RM
@ 80% 1RM
- neuromuscular adaptations only
- increases in muscle cross sectional area
Effect of 10% VO2 max increase
- Can do submax activities for 3x longer
Fiaterone et al., 1990 (HIIT for 90 y/o)
Methods
- 90 year olds
- 80% 1RM
- 8 reps x 3 sets, 3 sessions/wk
- 8 weeks
Fiaterone et al., 1990 (HIIT for 90 y/o)
Findings
- 174% strength increase in lower body
- 9% hypertrophy of mid-thigh
- 48% improvement in function
- detraining effect significant within 4 weeks
- strength gains did not plateau
- no change in intramuscular or subcutaneous fat
Paterson et al., 2004 (Determinants of Dependence)
Methods
- 55-86 year olds
- non-institutionalized
- completed VO2max test
- 8 year follow-up
Paterson et al., 2004 (Determinants of Dependence)
Findings
- for each unit increase of VO2max, odds of dependence decreased by 14%
- probability of dependence 50% less
- a 10-20% increase in VO2max predicts 50% decrease in odds of dependence
- presence of disease increased odds ~4x
- age increases odds
Govindasamy et al., 1992 (CR Adaptations Older Men)
Methods
- 66.5 years
- older men
- walk/jog
- max exercise test pre, during, and post intervention once per week
Govindasamy et al., 1992 (CR Adaptations Older Men)
Phase I Methods
- 4 weeks
- Training speed = 70% VO2max initial
- 3x/week, 10-15 min warm up
- 1x/week on their own
Govindasamy et al., 1992 (CR Adaptations Older Men)
Phase I Findings
- VO2
- VO2 improved 6.6%
- VO2 change vs Time yielded exponential curve
- Half time to rate of adaptation = 13.8d, 8.3 sessions
- Adaptation completed within 4 week period
- VO2 reached a plateau
Govindasamy et al., 1992 (CR Adaptations Older Men)
Phase I Findings
- Submax HR
- Half time = 9.1d, 5-6 sessions
- Decreased by 10bpm
- HR plateaued
Govindasamy et al., 1992 (CR Adaptations Older Men)
Phase II Methods
- 5 weeks
- Training speed = 80% VO2max initial
- 3x/week, 10-15 min warm up
- 1x/week on their own
Govindasamy et al., 1992 (CR Adaptations Older Men)
Phase II Findings
- VO2
- improved additional 5.2%
- did not plateau, thus stimulus need not change
Govindasamy et al., 1992 (CR Adaptations Older Men)
Phase II Findings
- Submax HR
- decreased additional 6bpm
Thomas et al., 1985 (Training Intensity & Older Adults)
Findings
- intensity > duration or frequency when building VO2
- increasing intensity increases response
For every unit (ml/min/kg) increase in VO2 max, the odds of becoming dependent are reduced __%
14%
Sit-to-Rise Test
- Method
- Scoring
- shoes off, legs crossed in standing position
- lower to seated position without using arm/leg/knee
- stand from seated position without aid
- Max = 10 (5 up, 5 down)
- 8-10 indicative of longer life
(More/less) DNA methylation indicates more youth
Less
Aging is attributed to 75% ___ and 25% ___
Lifestyle
Genes
Avram & Harry, 2009 (Cryolipolysis)
- How does it work?
- Cold-induced inflammatory response within 3 days of cold exposure
- Influx of inflammatory cells stimulates adipocyte apoptosis. Peaks ~14 days
- Remnants of dead fat cells phagocytozed by macrophages/WBCs as part of natural injury response. Peaks ~14-30 days
- Inflammatory response subsides, reduced fat cell volume, interlobular septae thickens. Peaks ~60 days
- Inflammatory response declines further ~90 days
- Area previously containing fat cells is decreased, septae constitute majority of tissue volume
Vaughan et al., 2007 (Multimodal Exercise)
- Methods
- 65-75 year olds
- 16 week multimodal: cardiovascular, strength, motor fitness training
- 2x/week
Vaughan et al., 2007 (Multimodal Exercise)
- Findings
- Intervention group performed better: neurocognitively, physically, higher BDNF
- More BDNF implies neurogenesis
Liu et al., 2017 (Resistance vs Multimodal)
- Methods
- 75+ years old
- review article
- muscle strengthing and balance
Liu et al., 2017 (Resistance vs Multimodal)
- Findings
- Neither progressive resistance training (PRT) nor multimodal improved ADLs
- Multimodal more effective for improving muscle strength, balance, lower extremity function, fall reduction among adults with reduced physical capacity
- Both PRT and multimodal improve strength and balance
Multimodal - dynamic standing balance, gait speed
PRT - muscle strength, static standing balance