Lecture 5 - Spatial Vision Flashcards

1
Q

orientation sensitivity in humans

A

V1 simple cells respond to oriented bars and edges.

- tilt after-effect (provides evidence)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Three components of the tilt-after effect:

A
    • orientation tuned neurons respond best to preferred orientation BUT also other similar orientations - this is the RESPONSE FUNCTION OF A CELL
  1. perceived orientation determined by distributions of responses across cells. - if the stimulus doesn’t match the receptive field of any of the receptors - the greatest response with most similar receptive fields and greatest peak will be perspective tilt point.
  2. adaptation - cells response decrease following prolonged activity - cells fatigue if responding for a long time causing response to decrease
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

size of after-effect depends on difference between adapting and test pattern:

A
  1. if the difference is BIG: we would expect the adapting pattern to cause adaptation of relevant cells = SMALLER AFTER-EFFECT
  2. if the difference is SMALL (adapting and test pattern similar): we would expect a bigger impact on the distribution of response and therefore bigger tilting = LARGER AFTER EFFECT
  3. NO AFTER EFFECT when adapting at vertical and testing at vertical as it causes no symmetry
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

TILT-AFTER EFFECT: if adaptation is on anti-clockwise tilt..

A
  • clockwise after effect

- if the tilt is greater this = smaller after-effect in clockwise direction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

different cells in V1 have different orientations and….

A

different sizes - respond to different sizes of line

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

size after-effect

A
  • similar to tilt-after effect
  • cells all tuned to same orientation are tuned to different sizes
  • cell that matches size gives biggest response - surrounding cells give also do (e.g. matches cell 3, 2 and 4 also respond)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

size and spatial frequency:

A
  • big bars have low spatial frequency

- skinny bars have high spatial frequency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what is spatial frequency:

A

number of bars per unit (usually cycles per degree)

one degree refers to visual eye field

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

natural images and spatial frequencies

A

high spatial frequency = fine details - e.g. outline of face

low spatial frequency = course information - e.g. shade information where features are

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

contrast?

A
  • contrast refers to the difference in luminance from light to dark areas
  • another way to define features of the retinal image
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

perceiving spatial frequencies:

A
  • high spatial frequencies you can see individual lines

you cant at low spatial frequencies

  • therefore we have greater sensitivity to intermediate spatial frequencies and these can be perceived at low contrasts
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what are groups of neurons that respond to different frequencies termed as:

A

channels

  • see faces closer up because spatial frequencies get lower and details get bigger
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

spatial contrast sensitivity function:

A
  • receptive field sizes increase in periphery
  • contrast sensitivity varies with eccentricity i.e. we cant see high spatial frequencies in periphery
  • so acuity is poor in the periphery
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

retinal versus real size

A
  • spatial frequency tells us about SIZE ON RETINA
  • doesn’t indicate real size
  • size will get bigger on retina when object closer - but we know real size hasn’t changed.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Burbeck (1987)

A

two stimulus (of vertical lines) at different distances from P

  • asked which has thinner bars’
  • Ps really struggled to discriminate retinal size
  • found PS couldn’t make estimates of the size of the bars when referenced to real world
  • but discriminating real size was easy even though size difference was similar
  • we are aware of the sizing of the world but we don’t have conscious access to size on the retina.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

size constancy

A

we perceive objects real size in the world regardless of distance

17
Q

Orientation consatncy

A
  • we perceive an objects orientation in the world regardless of orientation on the retina