Lecture 5 - Attachment Theory Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Main themes in this lecture

A

 What is Attachment/Historical Context

 Strange Situation/Styles of Attachment

 Influences on Attachment

 Implications of Attachment

 Attachment Through the Lifespan

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is attachment

A

 An emotional bond with a specific person that endures across space and time
 Seek closeness
 Enable exploration of world
 Management of arousal and emotions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

History of attachment - Bowlby

A

1950s
AMSCI
- Attachment is adaptive
- The tendency to form one special type of attachment is monotropy
- Babies release social releasers that bring about an instinctive caregiving response. Explains how an attachment is formed
- Suggested their is a critical period for forming attachments 0-2.5 yrs of age
- Internal working model - it is believed the first primary attachment creates a type of schema for relationships known as the IWM.

Emotionally secure infants = emotionally secure, trusting and more socially confident adults.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Stages to his 1969 attachment theory

A
  • Preattachment (birth – 6 weeks)
     Baby’s innate signals (crying) attract the caregiver
     Infant comforted by caregiver’s response
  • Attachment-in-the-making (6 weeks – 6-8 months)
     Develops a sense of trust that caregiver will respond when signaled
    – developing expectations
     Infant responds preferentially to familiar people.

-Clear-cut attachment (6-8 months – 1 ½ years)
 Infant actively seeks contact with caregivers
 Mother becomes a “secure base”
 Separation anxiety

  • Reciprocal relationships (1 ½ - 2 years onward)
     Increased understanding of parents’ feelings, goals, and motives
     Better able to establish proximity to parents – working partnership
     Separation anxiety reduces
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Study of the types of attachment: Mary Ainsworth and the Strange Situation

A

Procedure: 100 middle class American mothers and their babies took part in a controlled observation. Each mother was observed with its mother in a specially arranged room with play materials as a series of prearranged activities took place.

  • A stranger entering the room (response to stranger)
  • A mother leaving the child alone and with the stranger (separation anxiety)
  • The mother returning to the room (reunion)

Findings:
- 66% secure attachment
- 22% insecure - avoidant
- 12% insecure resistant

They later found a fourth group of insecure disorganised attachment - infants that lack any consistent pattern of attachment behaviour.

Conclusions:
- There are individual differences in the type of attachments that infants form
- The majority of American children are securely attached
- The mother’s behaviour is important in the type of attachment that the baby forms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the styles of attachment?

A

Secure attachment
Insecure attachment: Avoidant, resistant and disorganised

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Say more about these styles of attachment

A

Secure (approx. 50-60% of infants*)
 Leave mother’s side to play but will check back
 Usually distressed by separation from mother
 Happy to see mother on reunion
 Allow themselves to be comforted and calmed
 Mother is a ‘secure base’

Avoidant (approx. 15% of infants)
 Tend to avoid mother in room. Fail to greet mother during reunion.

Ambivalent (approx. 9% of infants)
 Clingy during initial play
 Very distressed by mother’s absence
 Shows some seeking of contact with mother on her return is
combined with resisting behaviours e.g. squirming during embrace

Disorganised (approx. 15% of infants)
 No consistent way of coping
 Confused and contradictory (e.g. fear when approaching mother;
switch from calm to anger)
 May freeze

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Caution notes on what the style of attachment is and what it is not

A

 It is not a characteristic of the infant (i.e. being securely attached is not like being an extrovert or being timid)

 It is a characteristic of a relationship between two
people

 It is possible for an infant to have a different attachment
relationship with their mother compared to their father or other caregiver

 Attachment figure does not need to be the mother

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are some trends regarding the style of the attachments shows and parental sensitivity?

A

Parental Sensitivity
 Parents of securely attached
infants generally respond
warmly to their offspring and
are sensitive to their needs
 Reading infant’s signals
accurately
 Responding quickly
 Showing warmth

Parents of insecurely attached infants show less evidence of parental sensitivity:
Parents of avoidant infants:

 Indifferent and emotionally unavailable
 Can reject infants’ attempts at closeness
 Parents of ambivalent infants:
 Inconsistent
 Often highly anxious and overwhelmed by parenting

Parents of disorganised infants:
 Can show abusive, frightening or disoriented behaviours
Less Sensitive Parenting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Cross cultural attachments

A

Question from Strange situation and Bowlby - are norms dependent on America? Are ways we measure attachment culturally significant?

Posanda et al 2016
- Columbian, Peruvian, Mexican and USA mothers (3-6 years) dyads studied
- Behaviours were measured in a natural setting (like home or park)
- Was not the strange situation
- Maternal sensitivity was significantly associated with child security in all 4 cultures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Genetic influences

A

There is also a genetic influence

Ukrainian pre schools either raised by their family or in an institution

Found that children raised in their family, affect of 5HTT (a particular variant of serotonin transporter gene) not that important. But it is protective for children raised in institutions (made them less likely to have disorganised attachments by having this variant).

Attachment is stronger on the nurture overall but there is a genetic role

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Genetic influences

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Some info supporting the internal working model: early attachments and long-term effects

A

 Children who were securely attached as
infants:
* Seem to have closer, more harmonious relationships
with peers than do insecurely attached children
* Have positive peer and romantic relationships and
emotional health in adolescence
* Earn higher grades and are more involved in school
than insecurely attached children

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Effects on later childhood development - Kerns et al

A

 Kerns et al. (2007) found that 9-11 year olds who are securely
attached were more likely to:
 Report positive mood
- Mood diary
 Regulate their emotions using positive coping strategies
- “When my child is upset or has a problem, he/she:”
 Talks about how he/she is feeling
 Does something to solve the problem

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Effects on childhood friendships

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Effects on physical health

A

 Asthmatic children (8-17 years) with
secure attachment relationships report
fewer asthma symptoms

 Measure of inflammation and
attachment in infancy

 C-reactive protein (CRP) is a measure of
inflammation and is associated with
health risks
 Secure infants show lower rates of CRP at
18 (but not 12) months

17
Q

What about on later adult attachment styles?

A

Adult Attachment Interview (George et al., 1985)
Attachment Styles

Autonomous (// Secure)
 Recalls earlier attachment-related experiences objectively and openly
 Sees them as important
 Coherent and consistent
 Balanced account: Positives and negatives

Dismissing (// Avoidant)
 Dismisses attachment relationships as of little concern, value or
influence
 Poor recall
 Account can be inconsistent/contradictory

18
Q

More on adult attachment styles

A

Preoccupied (// Ambivalent)
 Intensely focused on parents – give confused and angry
accounts
 Caught up in memories – not coherent

Unresolved (// Disorganised)
 Have experienced a trauma or early death of an
attachment figure
 Have not come to terms with this
Account may not make sense and lack reasoning.

19
Q

What about the children of parents that have / had different attachment styles?

A

 Parents with secure
adult attachments
tend to have securely
attached children
(van IJzendoorn, 1995)
 But not always the
case

20
Q

What can be done in terms of clinical support for adults and their childhood attachment styles?

A

 Aid adults in overcoming early adversity and insecure
attachment.

 Talk about negative childhood events in a coherent and
contained manner – become ‘earned-secure’

 Observational study – leads to more positive parenting, even
under high-stress conditions (Phelps et al., 1998)

21
Q

What are the aims of parental training / cycle of security intervention?

A

Aims to improve:
1) parent’s understanding of her infant’s
emotional cues and relationship needs
(2) parent’s observational and inferential skills
(3) parent’s reflective functioning about the
reciprocal effects of her and her infant’s
behaviors on each other’s cognitions,
emotions, and behaviors
(4) parent’s capacity for emotion regulation
(5) parent’s appropriate responsiveness to her
infant’s signals relevant to her infant’s use of
her as a secure base for exploring and a safe
haven for comfort and safety

22
Q

What is a study I can refer to on Cycle of Security training?

A

Cassidy et al

 20 pregnant women who were on
probation for substance abuse

 Participated in a program called
Tamar’s Children from pregnancy through 12 months

 Included circle of security training

 No control group but compared data to other previously collected rates of attachment

23
Q

Study on Harlow’s monkeys

A

Aim: to investigate whether or not attachment is based on food or being fed

Procedure: monkeys taken from mothers and studied for 165 days. Choice of 2 surrogate mothers: a ‘wire’ mother with a milk bottle or a ‘wire’ mother covered in cloth.

Results: monkeys spent most of the time with the cloth mother and spent minimal time with the other just to get milk.

Challenged the
commonly held belief
that mothers were only
important for nourishment

 Established that healthy
social and emotional
development is rooted in
children’s early social
interactions with adults