Lecture 5 Flashcards

1
Q

Causal Question’s explainations in the role of DA in reward:

A
  1. “liking”
  2. Learning
  3. “wanting”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Experimental approaches to determine what DA does in reward: what reward function is _______

A
  1. Necessary cause (lost)
  2. Sufficient cause (enhanced)
  3. coding of function (coded)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Answers of Causal DA Question (1/4)

A
  1. Activation sensorimotor hypothesis of effort, arousal and response vigor
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Answers of Causal DA Question (2/4)

A
  1. Hedonia hypothesis of reward pleasure
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Answers of Causal DA Question (3/4)

A
  1. Reward learning hypothesis of associative stamping-in, teaching signals and prediction errors
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Answers of Causal DA Question (4/4)

A
  1. Incentive Salience hypothesis of reward “wanting”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

(A: 1/4) Activation-sensorimotor hypothesis

A

DA mediates general functions of: action generation, effort, movement, general arousal/behavioural activation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

(A: 2/4) Hedonia hypothesis

A

DA in NAc is a “Pleasure neurotransmitter”: Mediates +ve reinforcing effects of reward stimuli. Supress DA~Anhedonia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

DA and Hedonic Rxn’s in rats

A

DA reduction does NOT decrease “liking”

DA activation does not increase “liking”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

5 different brain manipulations insufficiently enhancing hedonic impact of reward

A
  1. Hyper-DA mutation (KO mice)
  2. AMPH injected in NAc
  3. AMPH systemic administration
  4. Sensitization
  5. Electrical brain stim reward
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

DA and Hedonic Rxn’s in humans

A

DA does NOT mediate subjective ratings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

DA does NOT mediate subjective ratings w/ two methods:

A
  1. Patients with Parkinsons show normal liking ratings

2. DDS patients have compulsive actions due to more L-Dopa administered.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Nonhedonic hypotheses of reward (two main)

A
  1. Reward learning

2. Incentive Salience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

(A: 3/4) Reward Learning hypothesis

A

DA signal modulates synaptic plasticity in target neurons, psychologically suggesting DA acts to etch links (in neostriatum and NAc) b/w S-S and S-R events.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Reward-Learning (DA) Hypotheses (3 types)

A

all say DA mediates learning but in different ways

  1. DA signals stamp in S-R and S-S associations whenever reward follows
  2. DA activation causes new habit learning (ergo habit performance)
  3. DA mediate teaching signals via US prediction errors
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Reward-Learning (DA) Hypothesis (1/3): Associative stamping in

A

DA acts as US reinforcement signal to learn associations about preceding reward stimuli. Based on Law of effect (thorndike)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Reward-Learning (DA) Hypothesis (1/3): Associative stamping in: Thorndike’s Law of effect (3 components)

A
  1. Context (S)
  2. Instrumental response (R)
  3. Response outcome (O)
18
Q

Reward-Learning (DA) Hypothesis (1/3): Associative stamping in: Thorndike’s Law of effect (summary)

A

if R in presence of S followed by satisfying event~ S-R association strengthened
If R in presence of S followed by unsatisfying event~S-R association weakened.

Reinforcer (O) “stamps” S-R association

19
Q

Reward-Learning (DA) Hypothesis (1/3): Associative stamping in: Supporting Evidence

A
  • Extinction-mimicry
  • DA modulating mechanisms of LTP and LTD
  • DA manips right after learning trial alters consolidation.reconsol of memories
20
Q

Reward-Learning (DA) Hypothesis (2/3): Habit Learning

A

DA causes new S-R habits to be learned &/or modulates strength of learned S-R habits

21
Q

Reward-Learning (DA) Hypothesis (3/3): Prediction Error Learning Model(s)

A

suggest DA embodies specific parameters of learning equations by acting as a teaching signal.

  1. Rescorla-Wagner Model
  2. Temporal Difference Model
22
Q

Reward-Learning (DA) Hypothesis (3/3): Prediction Error Learning Model (a) Rescorla-Wagner Model

A

suggests DA boosts might increase predictions of future reward (V) to a (CS). Increase in DA elevates prediction error (lambda-V) generated by hedonic impact of US (lambda) at moment of reinforcement, boosting amount of learning on the trial (deltaV).

23
Q

Reward-Learning (DA) Hypothesis (3/3): Prediction Error Learning Model (b) Temporal Difference Model

A

time more explicit in expectations of reward as series of future events. V becomes more accurate thru learning about actual rewards via prediction errors that modulate synaptic weights in circuits involved in future predictions.

24
Q

DA makes _____ contributions to both ____ & ____, but not directly causing _______

A

Indirectly, learning, learned performance, formation of new reward associations

25
Q

Evaluation of DA’s direct roles (divided into 3 questions)

A
  1. is DA a necessary cause?
  2. Is DA a Sufficient cause?
  3. DA neuronal firing patterns?
26
Q

Is DA necessary cause?

A

unneccessary for normal reward learning, ergo not a cause. DA contributes to learning as teaching signal, prediction error or Stamping-in mechanism

27
Q

Is DA a sufficient cause?

A

showed increased “wanting” but not “liking”.

28
Q

DA neuronal firing?

A

DA neurons may code informational consequence of learning signals. Hypothesized to be incentive motivation.

29
Q

(A: 4/4) Incentive Salience hypothesis: central premise

A

Reward is composite of wanting, liking and learning.

DA only mediates “wanting” portion.

30
Q

Incentive salience is NOT:

A

a) hedonic “liking, nor sensory pleasure

b) reducible to learning

31
Q

Incentive salience is:

A

a motivational transformation of a reward-related neural representation (ie: percieved or recalled CS or US).

32
Q

Incentive salience value of stimulus is generated by

A

mesolimbic systems each time reward stim occurs and pre-existing reward related associations

33
Q

DA= _____

A

Incentive salience

34
Q

Important that Incentive salience combines:

A

Mesolimbic dopamine system mechanisms AND Physiological states

35
Q

Motivational magnets

A

CS produced by Incentive salience.

36
Q

Incentive Salience theory step 1:

A
  1. CS “wanting” assignment based on “liked” US. predictors go from neural to desired. The hedonic activation by new US.
37
Q

Incentive Salience Theory step 2:

A
  1. CS “wanting” reboosting. Steps are appetitive. Associative-learning between, strengthens the incentive salience assignment to rewarded stimuli.
38
Q

Reboosting

A

keeps up motivation for long-term. Keeps it wanted for later trials. Reboosting keeps the reward relevant. counters extinction mimicry.

39
Q

Extinction Mimicry

A

gradual falling off of consummation of a well-established reward

40
Q

Incentive Salience Theory step 3:

A

Attribution of “wanting” to a CS. making the CS more “wanted” by route of the reboosting of stage 2 and adds physiological states of each reward introduction.

Incentive Salience of CS becomes a conditioned motivational response