Lecture 4 - Other Offences Against the Person Flashcards

1
Q

What is the difference between assault and battery?

A

Assault involves some from of physical contact between parties (however slight).

Battery is ATTEMPTED assault

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

However, some jurisdictions have allowed the threat of assault (ex brandishing a knife) to___

A

constitute assut

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Under the MPC, assault combines the following 3 elements:

A

physical contact,
attempted physical contact,
and causing reasonable apprehension of bodily injury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the 3 elements of physical battery?

A
  1. The engagement of of the unlawful application of physical force
  2. Which results in either bodily injury or offensive touching
  3. And is acted u[on with purpose, knowledge, or recklessness (or negligence in some jurisdictions) to cause the result
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

for physical battery, it is presumed that___

A

the physical force must be unlawful and unjustified

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

For Assault, distant harms___

A

do not qualify. mere verbal threats of shooting someone would be insufficient, whereas brandishing a gun after making the threat would be

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the general required mental state for assault?

A

merely intending to cause the victim to apprehend that some form of harm will befall them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the 3 basic elements of kidnapping?

A
  1. Confining or carrying away the victim,
    This element is the most controversial and is also referred to as “asportation”
    In common law, this was usually met only if the victim was transported across state lines
    Now, it is met by the slightest movement of the victim by the perpetrator, so long as that moment was not in the commission of another crime
    Ex. Kiddnapping and carjacking would not be counted seperatly as that would be charging twice for the same act
  2. Forcibly by threat or or fear or deception, and
    All jurisdictions agree that accomplishing the act through force is enough to meet the act requirement, while MPC jurisdictions recognize that the act requirement is met by fearer deception
  3. For a nefarious purpose
    This meets the mental requirement
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What 3 things does the MPC recognize as nefarious purposes for kidnapping?

A
  1. To hold for ransom/as a shield
  2. To facilitate another felony or flight thereafter
  3. To inflict bodily injury on or to terrorize the victim or another
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Does minimal contact count as physical battery?

A

yes. People v. Peck

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Whether or not an assault has occurred is determined by___

A

whether a reasonable person in the circumstance would have felt a reasonable apprehension of bodily harm State v. Birthmark

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the 4 factors of the test to determine if asportation has occurred (defined in Goolsby v. State)

A
  1. The duration of the movement
  2. Whether the moment occurred during the commission of a separate offence
  3. Whether such movement wass an inherent part of that separate offence
  4. Whether the movement itself presented a significant danger to the victim independent of the danger imposed by the separate offence

This test is factor based, and 2 of the 4 factors being met is sufficient to find asportation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Under common law, what 3 categories is theft divided into?

A
  1. Larceny
  2. Theft by false pretences
  3. Embezzlement
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Define larceny

A

tresspassory taking away something of someone else’s with the intent to permanently deprive the TO of that property, also included “larceny by trick”, which involves fraud to unlawfully gain possession over the item. Larceny either involves a physical taking or a ruse to deprive the true owner of their possessoon. Either way, the “intent to permanently deprive the TO” is essential

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Define Theft by false pretences, and differentiate it from larceny

A

very similar to “larceny by trick”, but it requires that the actor acquire actual title (as opposed to mere possession) through the use of fraud. This is differentiated further from “larceny by trick” in which theft by false pretences has the TO intending to transfer title whereas larceny by trick does not

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Define embezzlement

A

involves an actor’s lawful possession of another’s personal property, which is then converted or appropriated by the actor to purposefully deprive the TO of the property.

17
Q

What differentiates larceny from embezzlement?

A

the actor lawfully has possession over the item, while in larceny the actor does not

18
Q

Does the MPC follow such divisions of theft?

A

No. It has one all encompassing theft offence

19
Q

What are the 4 factor for the MPC theft offence?

A
  1. Physically take and carry away, or
  2. Use deception, fraud or extortion to take…
  3. The victim’s property with…
  4. The intent to permanently deprive the victim of the property
20
Q

What defines fraud and extortion?

A

if the taking is completed through less than physical means, such as deception or coercion, then it is classified as fraud or extortion - these offences all involve the victim wilfully given the defendant access to the property, but the fraud vitiates that consent

21
Q

What defines extortion?

A

the perpetrator convinces the owner to convey property in exchange for the perpetrator promising not to engage in some illegal act - ex. Promising not to assault the victim if they are paid $500

22
Q

What defines blackmail?

A

the perpetrator convinces the owner to convey property in exchange for the perpetrator promising not to engage in some LEGAL act

23
Q

Under the MPC extortion and blackmail are___

A

consolidated into a more general extortion charge

24
Q

For the mens rea of theft___

A

the defendant need only know that that the victim has possessory interest of the item. So, if the defendant is unaware that the property is owned by someone else, they cannot be guilty of theft

25
Q

What defines robbery?

A

robbery involves the use of physical fore ti accomplish theft

26
Q

According to the MPC, a person is guilty of robbery if, in the course of committing a theft they:

A
  1. Inflict serious bodily injury upon another, or
  2. Threatens another with or purposefully puts them in fear of immediate serious bodily injury, or
  3. Commits or threatens immediately to commit any felonyof the first or second degree
27
Q

Jimmy is a pickpocket. Is Jimmy a robber?

A

No. At most, Jimmy has committed larceny.

28
Q

Jimmy pickpockets a customer at Starbucks. the customer notices, and the two struggle for the customers wallet off the counter before Jimmy punches the customer and wrenches the wallet out of the customer’s hand. Is Jimmy a robber?

A

Because Jimmy used more force than would be strictly necessary to take the wallet, yes.

29
Q

What defines burglary?

A

Traditionally, breaking into a private area with intent to commit a felony within. Today, the requirements have been lessened. Mere intent to trespass and commit a felony therein may be sufficient.

30
Q

For a person to be convicted of burgerly, must the intended crime within the private space be completed?

A

No. The mere action of entering with intent to commit a crime is enough

31
Q

Under common law, what is the message rea for arson?

A

a willful and malicious burning