Lecture 4 - Microbiome Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is microbiota?

A
  • We are not alone - contact with numerous microorganisms daily
  • Most microbes are not pathogenic
    – Balancebetweencommunities
  • Some are found natively on/in our body
  • Some are introduced suddenly
  • ‘Our other genome’ (Nature, 2010)
  • ‘Your inner ecosystem’ (Scientific American, 2012)
    “signify the ecological community of commensal, symbiotic and pathogenic microorganisms that literally share our body space“
    -> Bacteria (bacteriome), viruses (virome), fungi (mycobiome), ‘tiny other organisms’ (e.g., helminths, protozoans)
    -> Microbiome = Bacteriome + Virome + Mycobiome + tiny others
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Size of the microbiota

A

Most microbiomes are 10-100x smaller than human cells (mitochondria size)

  • About 1014 cells
  • About same number as human cells (1.3x) Sender et al. 2016 PLoS Biol; Nature News Jan 2016
  • 150x more genes
  • About 0.2-2 kg of the human body mass
  • ‘Forgotten organ’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Human microbiome

A
  • Associated with diseases
    – Diabetes
    – Rheumatic disorder
    – Multiple sclerosis
    – Parkinson
    – Neurodermatitis
    – Psoriasis
    – Autism
    – …
  • Cause or consequence / link microbial biomarker with causation
    – Helicobacter pylori associated peptic ulceration and gastric cancer
    – Clostridium difficile infection-associated diarrhea
  • Symbiosis between host and microbiota (not only in human)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is a healthy (gut) microbiome?

A

Complex combination of environmental, genetic & lifestyle factors

“One person’s healthy microbiome might not be healthy in another context - it’s a tricky concept”

“There won’t be “the” healthy microbiome, just like there’s no perfect genome”;
“There could be multiple healthy configurations.”

’Our findings suggest that gut taxonomic signatures can predict health status, and highlight how data sharing efforts can provide broadly applicable discoveries.’
A predictive index for health status using species- level gut microbiome profiling
– Gupta et al. (Nat. Comm. 2020)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Body site differences

A

‘Diversity of the human microbiome is concordant among measures, unique to each individual, and strongly determined by microbial habitat.’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Cultural differences

A

Differences in the faecal microbial communities of Malawians, Amerindians and US adults.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Human gut microbiome

A
  • ‘Gut feeling’ (vagus nerve)
  • Heavily influenced by what you eat
    – Rapidly reacts to changes in diet
    – Leveloffat ,carbohydrates, fiber, sugar, artificial sweeteners,…
  • Changes with age
  • Responses to stress
  • Altered in presence of diseases, antibiotics, …

-> Mostly influenced by environmental factors and not genetics

GENUS LEVEL
Diversity changes after birth

PHYLUM LEVEL
Diversity changes through lifetime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Food & Gut microbiome
-> Modulation of the gut microbiome

A
  • High-fiber diet changes microbiome function
  • Fermented-food diet increases microbiome diversity
  • Calorie restriction leads to increase in metabolic health BUT bacterial diversity decreases (C. difficile enrichment)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Food & Gut microbiome
-> Modulation of the gut microbiome

A
  • High-fiber diet changes microbiome function
  • Fermented-food diet increases microbiome diversity
  • Calorie restriction leads to increase in metabolic health BUT bacterial diversity decreases (C. difficile enrichment)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Gut brain axis

A
  • Bacteria produce
    – Short-chain fatty acids
    – Secondary bile acids
    – Tryptophan metabolites
  • Problem
    1. Intestinal barrier
    2. Blood-Brain barrier
    -> Some products can cross the barriers
  • Products
    – Oxytocin (L. reuteri)
    – GABA (L. rhamnosus)
    – Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF; B. longum NCC3001)
    – SCFA (SCFA-producing bacteria)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Human skin microbiome

A
  • Skin – border to the outer world
  • Microorganisms are protective
  • Very different regional composition
    – Moist
  • inter-digital
    – dry
  • forearm, lower leg
    – Sebaceous
  • nose, neck, shoulders
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Microbiome sequencing

A
  • Commonly used marker: 16S rRNA gene
    – ~1.3 kbp long
    – Conserved secondary structure
    -> prevents the sequence from accumulating too much diversity
    – Nine hypervariable regions (V1-V9)
    – Bacteria and archaea (but different primers)
    – Next generations sequencing -> V1-V2, V3-V4 or V4
  • Marker for fungi: 18S rRNA, ITS
  • Marker for eukaryotes: COI (Cytochrome C oxidase subunit I)

1) Sampling
- 16S rRNA Gene
2) DNA isolation
- PCR amplification
3) Sequencing
4) fastq
5) Analysis (Preprocessing, Taxonomic assignment, Statistical analysis)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Data Preprocessing

A
  • Sequencing data usually noisy and redundant
  • pre processing steps
    -> quality filtering (remove bad quality bases/reads)
    -> merge overlaps
    -> remove chimeric sequences
    -> data dereliction (to reduce computational burden)
    -> cluster data into (zero-radius) operational taxonomic units (OTUs) or amplicon sequence variants (ASVs)
    -> Taxonomic assignment
    -> OTU/ASV table
    -> Phylogenetic tree reconstruction
  • (Popular) Software
    -> Mothur
    -> Dada2
    -> USEARCH, vsearch
    -> FastTree (fast phylogenetic tree reconstruction)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Biodiversity

A

‘variety within and among life forms on a site, ecosystem, or landscape’
1. Richness (R or S)
* Number of groups of genetically or functionally related individuals
-> number of species
2. Evenness (E)
* Relative abundance of different species

  • Biodiversity can be measured at different scales
    – Alpha diversity
  • Diversity within a given community
    species richness, species evenness or combination of both
    – Beta diversity
  • Partitioning of biological diversity among communities number of species shared between two communities
    – Gamma diversity
  • Landscape diversity within a region
    – (Bio-) Diversity: Low dimensional summary of communities
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Biodiversity and microbial world

A
  • Species concept
    – Based on evolutionary theory
    – Introduced by Ernst Mayr 1944
    ‘species is a group of organisms that remain phenotypically similar because of recombination’

Particularly problematic with bacteria and archaea
* Reproduce asexually
* Horizontal gene transfer (HGT) between distantly related species
-> Generally, do not talk about species but operational taxonomic units (OTUs)
* 97% sequence similarity threshold for 16S rRNA
– An OTU may be associated with several species
* Amplicon sequence variant (ASV; dada2) or Zero-radius OTUs (e.g., UNOISE3/USEARCH) (denoised sequencing reads)
– One species, multiple sequences (ASVs)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Alpha diversity

A
  • Richness/diversity of a community
  • ‘local species pool’
  • Traditional concepts available
    – Species richness (C)
    – Chao1
    – Shannon index (H’)
    – (inverse) Simpson index (D)
    – Phylogenetic distance –…
  • Compositional data concepts
    – Estimate richness
    “how many species were missing from the sample” (e.g., breakaway)
    – Shannon (DivNet), Shannon’s E
  • Visualisation using box-/violine plots
  • Non-parametric tests, linear models, …
16
Q

Beta diversity

A
  • Total species diversity
  • Dissimilarity between communities
  • Common concepts (traditional)
    – Bray-Curtis dissimilarity (abundance)
    – Jaccard index (presence/absence)
    – (weighted) UniFrac distance metric (phylogeny based)
    Compositional data concepts
    – Aitchison
    – Phylogenetic Isometric Log-Ratio (ILR)
    Visualisation using ordination methods
    – PCoA, NMDS, Capscale, …
    PERMANOVA test, non-parametric tests, modelling, …
17
Q

Compositional data

A

Change in one species leads to shift in the relative abundance of all taxa

18
Q

Analyzing data: Alpha diversity

A
  • Which estimate for alpha diversity?
    Deeply personal decision -> Shannon (and breakaway)
  • Which variables explain the observed differences?
    Vector of diversity estimates E
    – Set of variables x1,x2,x3,…
    – ModelE~model(x1,x2,x3)
    – Solution
  • One variable: (non-) parametric test
  • Multiple variables: Linear modelling

– Matrix of pairwise distances D – Set of variable sx1,x2,x3,…
– Model D~model (x1,x2,x3)
– Solution
Non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance based on permutation
of variables (PERMANOVA)
-> p-value and effect (R2) per variable

19
Q

Analyzing data: Taxonomy

A
  • Classical approach Problem: Sparsity of the data and compostitional data property
    – Parametric or non-parametric tests for each class between groups
    – Linear modelling
  • Compositional Regression approaches
    – ALDEx2 (Fernandez et al. Microbiome, 2014)
    – corncob (Martin, Witten, Willis Ann Appl Stat, 2019)
    – ANCOMBC (Lin & Peddada Nature Communications 2020)
20
Q

Analyzing data: Summary

A
  • Transform data (if necessary)
  • Subset data, remove outliers, remove contamination (e.g. R::decontam), …
  • Filter certain taxa (e.g. potential contaminants)
  • Choose a distance measurement (40+ choices)
  • Choose an ordination method (MDS, NMDS, RDA, …)
  • Choose a clustering method (KNN, PAM, dbscan, …)
  • Choose continous variable (group or gradient of varibales: many…)
  • Choose a graphical representation
    -> More than 200 million different ways of analyzing the data
21
Q

Bullous pemphigoid

A
  • Most common autoimmune blistering skin disease
  • Acute or chronic autoimmune disease
    – antibodiesagainstskinlayers(epidermisanddermis)
  • Mostly elderly people are affected
    – >60years
    – 1in10,000-100,000
  • Study
    – 12 patients
    – 12 controls
    – Samples (skinswabs) from5 different locations
  • elbow, back, forehead, perilesional site,
    non-lesional site
    – DNA extraction and sequencing – Data pre-processing and analysis
22
Q

Mitochondria - Microbiome

A
  • Mitochondrion
    – Double membrane cell organelle
    – Power plant of cells (produces ATP)
    – Carries its own genome (mtDNA)
  • ~16 kbp long (mammalian cell)
  • 13 protein coding genes
  • Transfer RNAs (tRNAs)
  • Ribosomal RNA genes (rRNAs)
    – Maternally inherited, no recombination
  • Mutations
    – Leber’s hereditary optic neuritis
    – Type 2 Diabetes
    – Cardiovascular diseases
    – Autoimmune diseases
  • Rheumatoid arthritis
  • Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)
    – Obesity
  • How to link influence of mitochondria on microbiome?
    – Conplastic mouse strains
  • Same nuclear genome, different mtDNA
  • BL/6J, BL/6J-mtFVB/NJ, BL/6J-mtNZB/BlnJ
  • FVB: G7778T (mt-Atp8 Gene)
  • NZB: multiple mutations
  • 16 mice per strain (9 females, 7 males)
  • 3 month old mice
23
Q

Data processing

A
  1. Fastq/Fasta conversion
  2. Merge reads (paired end data)
  3. Quality filtering
  4. Chimera removal
  5. Denoising
  6. Alignment & Dereplica/on
  7. OTU binning
24
Q

Data analysis

A
  • Alpha diveristy
  • Beta diveristy
  • Abundance analysis
  • Differential abundance
  • Indicator species
  • Network analysis
  • Funktional imputation
  • Phylogenetic analysis
  • Further analyses/Data interpretation
25
Q

Pitfalls - Associations

A

“A substantial proportion of the taxa that comprise the human gut microbiome fail to colonize in the recipient animals.”
“…, the small number of donors used in most studies does not capture the extensive inter-individual variability of the human gut microbiome, which is typically much larger than the effect sizes caused by the disease state.”

26
Q

Pitfalls - Cohort selection

A

“… We identify alcohol consumption frequency and bowel movement quality as unexpectedly strong sources of gut microbiota variance that differ in distribution between healthy participants and participants with a disease and that can confound study designs. We demonstrate that for numerous prevalent, high-burden human diseases, matching cases and controls for confounding variables reduces observed differences in the microbiota and the incidence of spurious associations. … “