Lecture 4 - Leases Flashcards
What is leasing?
An organisation can: • use cash to acquire asset, • borrow to acquire asset, • use hire purchase to acquire asset, or • lease to acquire asset Lease - contract between: lessor who owns asset but leases it to lessee who uses asset for an agreed period of time in return for payment of rentals
Whats the critical difference between leasing and other methods of acquiring an asset?
with leasing legal title never (?) passes from the lessor (the legal owner) to the lessee (the user of the asset)
Potentially, therefore, with certain types of lease this gives rise to a conflict between the form and the substance of the transaction.
Assets potentially leased
- Cars, trucks, planes
- Trains
- Copiers, computers
- Shops, offices
- Schools, hospitals
- University residences
- Almost anything!
Advantages of leasing over purchasing
- operating flexibility,
- cash flow,
- tax,
- Off-B/S finance.
- The cost of assets acquired for leasing rose from £288 million in 1973 to £2,894 million in 1983 to £10,200 million in 1991 (UK Financing and Leasing Association Statistics)
- Much of this increase was due to tax advantages over this period
Lease Accounting
With ‘traditional’ accounting the lessor would capitalise and depreciate the asset with the lessee recognising only the periodic lease payments as an expense
But conflict here potentially between ‘legal form’ and ‘substance’
The [very!] basic idea is that a finance lease is rather like a hire-purchase contract
Finance vs Operating Lease (1a)
Finance lease
lease transfers to lessee ‘substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership’
Risks might include:
Losses from idle capacity or
Variations in return due to changing economic conditions
Rewards being:
profitable operation over the asset’s economic life
gain from appreciation in value or realisation of residual value
Operating lease
all other leases
Finance vs Operating Lease (1b)
IAS 17 does NOT define ‘substantially all’
but gives examples of situations pointing to transference of ‘substantially all’
Some national GAAPs take a more numerical approach
US/Germany require PV of minimum lease payments (MLP) ≥ 90% of fair value of leased asset
UK ≥ 90% gives ‘presumption’ of finance lease but other factors important
IAS 17: Situations that ‘would normally’ point to finance lease
- ownership of asset transferred to lessee by end of lease [But is this really a lease ???]
- option to purchase the asset at a price that is expected to be sufficiently lower than the fair value (i.e. bargain purchase option)
- lease term is a major part of economic life of asset
- PV of min lease payments amounts to substantially all of the asset fair value
- leased assets of a specialised nature
IAS 17: Situations that ‘could’ point to finance lease
- if lessee cancels lease, lessee bears lessor’s losses associated with cancellation
- gains/losses from fluctuations in the fair value of the residual fall to lessee
- lessee can continue lease for secondary period at lower rent (bargain rental option)
IAS 17- Finance vs Operating Lease (2): Some Terminology
Lease Term
period over which the lessee has contracted to lease the asset plus any further period for which the lessee has an option to extend the lease term with or without further payment (assuming it is reasonably certain option will be exercised)
Minimum Lease Payment (MLP)
payments over the lease term that the lessee is required to make, excluding costs for services and tax paid or reimbursed by lessor [plus certain guaranteed payments]
Interest Rate Implicit in the Lease
discount rate of interest which at inception causes the aggregate PV of MLP and PV of unguaranteed residual value to be equal to Fair value of the asset
FAIR VALUE OF LEASED ASSET (a) = PRESENT VALUE OF MINIMUM LEASE PAYMENTS (b) + PRESENT VALUE OF UNGUARANTEED RESIDUAL AMOUNT ACCRUING TO LESSOR
IAS 17- Finance vs Operating Lease (3a): Accounting Treatment
Finance lease
Lessee treats the leased asset as if owned, resulting in:
Balance sheet effect
recognition of asset on balance sheet
record future lease liability under current and non-current liabilities on balance sheet
Income Statement
depreciate asset
Charge interest on finance lease ‘loan’ in income statement
Operating lease
These are all other leases
charges annual lease rental payment against profit [straight line]
disclosure of liability in notes to accounts
3 categories: amounts due in next yr, years 2-5, and thereafter
Accounting for finance lease by Lessee: Summary
➢ Recognise asset at fair value or, if lower, PV of minimum lease payments (MLP)
➢ discount factor: interest rate implicit in lease
(if not known: lessee’s incremental borrowing rate)
➢ split capital lease payment between interest and capital repayment
➢ asset depreciated as owned fixed assets
(over shorter of economic life and lease term)
➢ MLP
includes residual value guaranteed by lessee
excludes contingent rentals (e.g. based on sales)
excludes any service element (e.g. maintenance)
Accounting for finance leases – lessor
- The assets themselves are not shown in the Statement of Financial Position (because they are in the lessee’s a/cs)
- Instead, the net investment in the lease is shown as a debtor/receivable
- Gross revenue is shown in Income Statement
IAS 17: Issues and Debates
Leaves door open for creative accounting due to unclear distinction between operating and finance leases
Numerical approach (e.g. the ‘90% test’) has problems too!
Note that (b) includes any guaranteed residual payment by lessee to lessor.
Therefore if lessor estimates (c) as greater than 10% of fair value, the contract is an operating lease.
FAIR VALUE OF LEASED ASSET (a) = PRESENT VALUE OF MINIMUM LEASE PAYMENTS (b) + PRESENT VALUE OF UNGUARANTEED RESIDUAL AMOUNT ACCRUING TO LESSOR
Rights and obligations under operating leases are not recognised in lessee’s accounts
Long term finance leases packaged as operating leases represent examples of the ‘off-balance sheet’ finance problem!
Financial leases - Disclosures: leases
IAS 17 requires disclosure of:
1. for each class of asset, the net carrying amount at the end of the reporting period.
a reconciliation between the total of future minimum lease payments at the end of
the reporting period, and their present value.
2. In addition, an entity shall disclose the total of future minimum lease payments at the end of the reporting period, and their present value, for each of the following periods:
not later than one year;
later than one year and not later than five years;
later than five years.
3. the total of future minimum sublease payments expected to be received under non-cancellable subleases at the end of the reporting period.
4. contingent rents recognised as an expense in the period.