Lecture 4 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

what kind of non-additive genetic variance is called dominance variance?

A

dominance variance: within locus (within gen) additivity

> interaction between alleles at a locus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is epistatic interaction?

A

epistatic interaction:

> interaction between loci

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what kind of genotypes exist at a biallelic locus?

what are the frequencies?

onder what assumption?

A

genotypes: AA, Aa, aa
frequencies: p², 2pq, q²

onder the assumption of random mating

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

variance explained by linear regression is called…?

unexplained (residual) variance is called …?

A

explained by linear regression: additive genetic variance

unexplained: dominance genetic variance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

in the case of full dominance, how much of genetic variance explained by linear regression?

A

67,7%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

ADE model:

var( pheno) = ?

A

var(pheno) = var (A) + var (D)

if var(D) = 0 >>> linear model

in var(D) > 0 and var(A) >>> not plausible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what are the expected correlations between twins an siblings in dominance variance?

A

var(D) correlations:

rMZ = 1

rDZ/Sibs = 1/4

rest = 0

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

why is the ACDE model not identiefied?

A

only 3 observed statistics and 4 free parameters

observed:

  1. 1 variance ( 4 but you assume them equal)
  2. MZ covariance
  3. DZ covariance

free:

  1. A
  2. C
  3. D
  4. E
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

ACDE model not identified in classical twin design

> solution? (2)

A
  1. extend your design so you can fit ACDE
  2. fit either ACE or ADE

>>> rule of thumb: when

rDZ < 0.5 rMZ >>> fit ADE

rDZ > 0.5 rMZ >>> fit ACE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

heritability in the ADE Model

how to calculate narrow sense heritability?

how to calculate broad sense heritability?

A

narrow sense (additive genetic effects)

> A / A + D + E

broad sense (all genetic effects)

> A + D / A + D + E

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

how to work with a sex limitation model

A

sex limitation model: use 4 groups defined by sex and zygosity

1) ACE contributions in males?
2) ACE contribution in females?
3. contributions equal in males and females?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what parameters in a homogene sex limitation model?

what parameters in heterogene?

A

homo: a, c, e
hetero: Am, Cm, Em, Af, Cf, Ef

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

sex limitation model: what group can be added?

what can be tested?

A

adding a 5th group

> DZOS (DZ opposite sex pairs)

>>> test if the A correlation is 0.5

>>> if rA < 0.5, genes in males and females may differ

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

sex limited model. all parameters are unequal between males and females but rA = 0.5

> what could be the case?

> how to test for it?

A

could be a scalar sex limited model, no difference in variance components but only in total variance

> test if

Af = x*Am

Cf = x*Cm

Ef = x*Em

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Gene- environment interaction van be a misnormer.

why?

A

e.g. interaction between genes and SES

> is SES truly environmental and not depending on genes?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what is one problem with detecting dominance using the classical twin model?

A

the power to detect dominance variance is low in classical twin studies

>> adding sibs can increase power

>> also: detection of twin - singleton differences

17
Q

non-additive genetic effects are present in many personality traits

> what does this suggest?

A

this suggests that personality is not neutral to selection

>>> neutral mutation plus random genetic drift tends to result in higher additive than non-additive genetic variation

18
Q

what does additive codominance stand for?

A

additive codominance = linearity (in regression)

>> dominance deviation parameter = 0