Lecture 3: The Axioms Of Rational Choice Flashcards
Axioms
A property or constraint which must be satisfied.
The preference relation
A ≥ B signifies “ A is preferred or indifference to B,” or “B is not preferred to A”
A = B signifies “ indifference between A and B”
The lottery
(ApB) signifies a gamble in which A occurs with probability p, and B occurs with probability 1-p
Axiom 1: Comparability
Given alternatives A and B, either A ≥ B, A ≤ B, or both, in which case A = B
All pairs of options can be compared; you r=either prefer one to the other, or else you are indifferent between them.
Pathology of Axiom 1
Inability to make a prediction or judgment of any kind (even of indifference) for some sets
Axiom 2: Transitivity
If A ≥ B and B ≥ C, then A ≥ C
Preferences can’t have “loops”; values must form a hierarchy
Pathology of Axiom 2
The “money pump”; manipulation via agenda setting
Axiom 3: Closer
If A and B are in S, then (ApB) is in S as well.
If I can compare A and B, then I can also compare lotteries over A and B.
Pathology of Axiom 3
Inability to make a prediction or judgment for choice under risk
Axiom 4: Distribution of Probability Across Alternatives (Frame invariance)
(ApB)qB = (ApqB)
Only the “final” probability of the outcomes matters, how it ex-pressing to me doesn’t matter.
My preferences should not be manipulated by the frame
Pathology of Axiom 4
Manipulation by framing effects
Axiom 5: Independence
For options A,B,C, A ≥ B if and only if (ApC) ≥ (BpC)
Prefer probability A otherwise C over probability B otherwise C
Lottery where I don’t get A or B, instead I get irrelevant third good C. If I like A more than B, then I should like the chance of getting A more than the same chance of getting B.
My preference of A or B shouldn’t be affect by the change of getting neither of one but C instead.
Pathology of Axiom 5
Manipulation by framing effects (Stochastic money pump)
Axiom 6: Consistency
A≥B if and only if A≥(ApB)≥B
ApB is mixture of A and B in the sense of sometime you get A and sometimes you get B. If you like A most or the least then some mixture of things in chance should be somewhere in between of them, not outside of two.
Pathology of Axiom 6
Violation of the “sure thing” principle; “(Strong) stochastic money pump
Axiom 7: Solvability
If A≥B≥C, there exists a probability p such that B=(ApC)
If you prefer A to B to C, there is some lottery over A and C which is equivalent to B
Pathology of Axiom 7
Obsession with the infinitely improbable; indirect violation of completeness
The Expected Utility Theory
Utility function: an abstract numerical measure of preference (outcomes)
Subjective probabilities: beliefs about states of the world, given choices (chances of
For each option, take the probabilities times outcome utilities.
Choose the option with highest expected utility.
0.6 = probability of 15 (utility)
E(u(A)) = 0.6u (15) + 0.4u (10)
= 0.6 √15 + 0.4 √10
= 0.6 (3.873) + 0.4 (3.162)
= 3.589