Lecture 3 (reasoning) Flashcards
1
Q
argument reconstruction? 2
A
- the goals are the clarification of the message and understanding the implicit premises
- is a task of interpretation which requires a set of skills
2
Q
motivated reasoning? 1+1->3
A
- to reason motivation is needed
- there is different types of motivation: accuracy, defense, and impression motivation
3
Q
what is the principle of charity? 3
A
- if one is interested in finding out the truth, one should accept the best reconstruction of an argument which gives reasons for accepting or rejecting proposition
- bad arguments should be assessed critically
- context is important for the interpretation of an argument
4
Q
what are truth values?
A
true or false values assigned to propositions
5
Q
logical assessment: deductive validity? 3
A
- determine whether or not the premises support the conclusion
- a conclusion has deductive validity if it follows logically from the premises given (the conclusion must be true if the premises are true, and the conclusion must be false if the premises are false)
- if it’s nonsense but well connected nonsense it is valid
6
Q
how to judge validity? 2+1
A
- ignoring the actual truth-values of both the premises and the conclusion
- if by pretending all premises to be true the conclusion is still false the argument is invalid
- focusing only on relations between propositions
7
Q
descriptive claims vs prespective claims? 2+1
A
- descriptive claims: these claims state facts
- prespective claims: these claims express desires, norms, moral rules
- both can be true or false
8
Q
conditional propositions?
A
they give certain conditions which, if assumed true, lead to logical conclusions
9
Q
equivalence in conditional propositions? 3
A
- contraposition is the equivalence between “if P then Q” and “if not Q then not P”
- “if and only if” puts both parts of the proposition under mutual obligation, so “if P then Q” and “if Q then P” are both true if “if and only if” is used
- “unless” conditionals can be translated to “P if not Q” and “if not Q then P”
10
Q
different interpretations of “or”? 2
A
- inclusive sense: “P or Q” can only be false if both are false
- exclusive sense: “either P or Q” can be false if both are false or both are true
11
Q
antecedents and consequents? 2+2
A
- antecedents are the conditions that ensure the truth of the consequents
- If A then Q
- the antecedent is sufficient, but not necessary for the consequent
- the consequent is necessary but not sufficent for the antecedent
12
Q
argument trees? 1+2
A
- represent arguments in diagrams for clarification
- type 1: premises support conclusion individually, have an implicit connecting premise that explains why the conclusion follows from the premises
- type 2: has premises supporting the conclusion only in unison
13
Q
deductive soundness?
A
valid arguments with true premises that lead to a true conclusion
14
Q
Modus ponens?
A
- if P then Q
- P
= Q
15
Q
Modus tollens?
A
- if P then Q
- not Q
= not P