Lecture 3: Identification, Categorization, and Stereotypes: Core Micro-Level (Intrapersonal) Processes Flashcards
What happens when we identify with an ingroup?
- the group becomes the basis for self-evaluation
- the group becomes the basis for the attraction
- the group becomes the basis for influence (conformity)
- groups are a source of self-representation - personal self-sacrifice - cooperation/ solidarity
- the group norms become the basis for our cross-group interactions
- treat them good if we like them, treat them bad if we don’t.
Are collective identities “bad”?
All of this begs the more basic question… are groups bad?
- YES, groups can be at the heart of some of the worst atrocities.
- BUT, collective identities create the psychological basis for cooperation within groups
- AND, collective identities can also encourage positive behaviour toward outgroups.
Use collective identities to come together and protest something we care about- doesn’t matter where we’re from→, climate change protest, free Palestine, etc.
- AND, collective identities serve valuable functions for individual people.
- AND, collective identities are essential to social change and to resistance against oppression and tyranny.
What is categorization and its consequences?
- we categorize people (including ourselves) like we categorize other stimuli.
- We use shared characteristics/actions/ functions of the individuals
- We also use situational cues (e.g., arrangement in space)
consequences of categorization
- depersonalized:
-individuals are (to some degree) now seen as interchangeable representatives of the category.
- within- group homogeneity: we tend to see greater similarity within groups
- *accentuation of group difference
- we tend to see greater contrast between groups.
A group exists when two or more people define themselves as members of the group and when non-members recognize its existence.
What are the psychological building blocks of intergroup relations?
- a social self (selecting the relevant “me”)
- a collective identity (“me” becomes “we”)
- Ingroup identification (“we” becomes important)
- categorization (seeing individuals as group members)
social groups (a shared understanding of meaningful groups) - Intergroup Relations (“us” and “them,” not “me” and “you”).
What are stereotypes?
- stereotypes are “generalizations about a group of people that differentiate them from other groups. Stereotypes are simple, overgeneralized, inaccurate, acquired secondhand, and resistant to new information.
- stereotypes are generalizations about a group of people in which identical characteristics are assigned to virtually all members of the group, regardless of actual variation among members.
- stereotypes are “socially” shared beliefs shared by members.
Both of the two definitions imply…
- stereotypes are erroneous
- stereotypes involve flawed thinking (or lack of thinking)
- stereotypes are undesirable.
What’s wrong with this type of view on stereotypes?
It doesn’t account for the fact that…
- stereotypes are normal. Like all beliefs, forming and holding beliefs about groups is an automatic (normal) cognitive process.
- Can lead to evaluations that are positive, negative, or neutral.
- Can be held about the ingroup (self-stereotypes) and can be applied to ourselves (Self-stereotyping).
- Are like other group norms and thus can be good or bad.
- Stereotypes can be functional.
How are stereotypes functional?
Functional for the holder
- categorization simplifies the world
- groups/ categories are meaningless without stereotypes
- allows us to know things (have expectations) about the social world.
- allows us to fill in the blanks when information is incomplete.
Functional for interpersonal interactions.
- stereotypes as knowledge (cultural sensitivity/ awareness)
Functional for intergroup relations
- multiculturalism
- colorblindness: ignoring categories/ avoiding stereotyping