Lecture 3: Asset Pricing II (CCAPM, ICAPM, APT models) Flashcards

1
Q
Consumption CAPM (CCAPM):
- ?-factor model
Asset returns ~ growth rate in aggregate ? if parameters of t' linear relationship are ?over time. 
- avoid ? critique.
A
Consumption CAPM (CCAPM):
- Single-factor model
Asset returns ~ growth rate in aggregate consumption if parameters of t' linear relationship are constant over time. 
- avoid Roll critique.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Consumption CAPM (CCAPM):

  • Amount of risk = extent to which ?? moves with consumption growth.
  • The higher the ? bet. asset returns & consumption growth, t ? we perceive t’ asset.
A

Consumption CAPM (CCAPM):

  • Amount of risk = extent to which risk premium moves with consumption growth.
  • The higher the covariance bet. asset returns & consumption growth, t riskier we perceive t’ asset.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q
CCAPM:
E(Ri) = ?*?
where
C = a consumption-tracking portfolio
Ri = return on asset i
RP_C = risk premium associate with consumption uncertainty
= RP_C = E(R_C ) = E(r_C )-rf
A
CCAPM:
E(Ri) = 𝛽_i,C * RP_C
where
C = a consumption-tracking portfolio
Ri = return on asset i
RP_C = risk premium associate with consumption uncertainty
= RP_C = E(R_C ) = E(r_C )-rf
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

CCAPM:

𝛽_𝐢𝑖= ?/?

A

CCAPM:

𝛽_𝐢𝑖=(πΆπ‘œπ‘£π‘Žπ‘Ÿπ‘–π‘Žπ‘›π‘π‘’ 𝑏𝑒𝑑𝑀𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑅_𝑖 π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ π‘π‘œπ‘›π‘ π‘’π‘šπ‘π‘‘π‘–π‘œπ‘› π‘”π‘Ÿπ‘œπ‘€π‘‘β„Ž )/(πΆπ‘œπ‘£π‘Žπ‘Ÿπ‘–π‘Žπ‘›π‘π‘’ 𝑏𝑒𝑑𝑀𝑒𝑒𝑛 𝑅_𝑀 π‘Žπ‘›π‘‘ π‘π‘œπ‘›π‘ π‘’π‘šπ‘π‘‘π‘–π‘œπ‘› π‘”π‘Ÿπ‘œπ‘€π‘‘β„Ž)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

CCAPM:

Ξ²_M,C is not necessarily equal to ?.

A

CCAPM:

Ξ²_M,C is not necessarily equal to 1.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

CCAPM: Issues:

  • ? issues
  • ? empirical performance
  • ? outperform CAPM.
A

CCAPM: Issues:

  • Data issues
  • Weak empirical performance
  • Not outperform CAPM.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q
Intertemporal CAPM (ICAPM)
- ?-period, ?-factor model. 
- Investors optimise ? over time when faced with uncertainty. 
=> investors will form multiple portfolios to ? against each of these risks – a ?-? CAPM.
A
Intertemporal CAPM (ICAPM)
- Multi-period, multi-factor model. 
- Investors optimise consumption over time when faced with uncertainty (e.g. prices of consumer goods, labor income, future investment opportunities).
=> investors will form multiple portfolios to hedge against each of these risks – a multi-beta CAPM
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

ICAPM:
- Market portfolio is no longer t’ ? ? portfolio in t’ sense th’ it’s a single choice for investors along with combinations of ?? asset.
- In ICAPM equilibrium, investors will hold a combination of:
> ?? asset
> ? portfolio
> ? portfolios.

A

ICAPM:
- Market portfolio is no longer t’ optimal tangency portfolio in t’ sense th’ it’s a single choice for investors along with combinations of rf asset.
- In ICAPM equilibrium, investors will hold a combination of:
> risk-free asset
> market portfolio
> hedging portfolios.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

ICAPM:

β€œ? variables”: any variables included in t’ model must have ? power as far as future asset ? are concerned.

A

ICAPM:
β€œState variables”: any variables included in t’ model must have predictive power as far as future asset returns are concerned.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Arbitrage: exploitation of security mispricing => make risk-free profits.

A

Arbitrage: exploitation of security mispricing => make risk-free profits.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT) vs CAPM assumptions:
APT assumes:
1. ?? capital market
2. investors always prefer more ? to less ? with ?.
3. ? relationship bet risk & return.

APT does not assume but CAPM does:

  1. a ?-? ? market portfolio
  2. ?? security returns.
  3. ? utility function.
A

Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT) vs CAPM assumptions:
APT assumes:
1. perfectly competitive capital market
2. investors always prefer more wealth to less wealth with certainty.
3. linear relationship bet risk & return.

APT does not assume but CAPM does:

  1. a mean-variance efficient market portfolio
  2. normally distributed security returns.
  3. quadratic utility function.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

APT expression can be written as a linear stochastic process generating actual returns:
Ri = ???
where:
Ri = ? return on asset i during a specified time period
E(Ri) = ? return for asset i if all the risk factors have ? changes
b_ij = reaction in asset i’s returns to ? in a common factor j
Ξ΄k = a set of ?? or ? with a ? mean that influences the ? on all assets
Ξ΅_i = a unique effect on asset i’s return that, by assumption, is ?? in large portfolios and has a mean of ?
N = number of assets

A

APT expression can be written as a linear stochastic process generating actual returns:
Ri = E(Ri) + b_i1 * Ξ΄i + b_i2 * Ξ΄i + … + b_ik*Ξ΄k + Ξ΅_i
where:
Ri = actual return on asset i during a specified time period
E(Ri) = expected return for asset i if all the risk factors have zero changes
b_ij = reaction in asset i’s returns to movements in a common factor j
Ξ΄k = a set of common factors or indexes with a zero mean that influences the returns on all assets
Ξ΅_i = a unique effect on asset i’s return that, by assumption, is completely diversifiable in large portfolios and has a mean of zero
N = number of assets

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Ξ΄ forms the essence of the APT: ? ? factors expected to have an impact on all assets:
e.g. ? , Growth in ?, Major ? upheavals, Changes in ? rates, …

This is at odds with ? as the only relevant explanatory variable in the CAPM.

Thus APT contends that there are ? factors that influence ?.
But: In application of the theory, the factors are not identified.

A

Ξ΄ forms the essence of the APT: multiple macroeconomic factors expected to have an impact on all assets:
e.g. Inflation, Growth in GNP, Major political upheavals, Changes in interest rates, …

This is at odds with beta as the only relevant explanatory variable in the CAPM.

Thus APT contends that there are MANY factors that influence returns.
But: In application of the theory, the factors are not identified.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

E(Ri) = ???
where:
Ξ»o = the expected return on an asset with ? ? risk
Ξ»j = the ?? related to the common jth factor
b_ij = the pricing relationship between the ?? and asset - that is how ? asset i is to jth common factor (often referred to as ?? or ?)

A

E(Ri) = Ξ»o + Ξ»1b_i1 + Ξ»2 * b_i2 + … + Ξ»kb_ik
where:
Ξ»o = the expected return on an asset with zero systematic risk
Ξ»j = the risk premium related to the common jth factor
b_ij = the pricing relationship between the risk premium and asset - that is how responsive asset i is to jth common factor (often referred to as factor betas or loadings)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

APT assumes that, in equilibrium, the return on a zero-investment, zero-systematic-risk portfolio is ? when the unique effects are ? away.

A

APT assumes that, in equilibrium, the return on a zero-investment, zero-systematic-risk portfolio is zero when the unique effects are diversified away.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Riskless arbitrage conditions:
1. Requires no net ? invested ?: βˆ‘_i ?= 0

  1. Will bear no ? or ? risk: βˆ‘_iβ–’ ? ? = 0 (For all K factors [i.e. no systematic risk] and w is small for all I [ unsystematic risk is fully diversified])
  2. Still earns a profit: βˆ‘_i ? ? > 0

(w_i = the percentage of ? in security i)

A

Riskless arbitrage conditions:
1. Requires no net wealth invested initially: βˆ‘_i w_i = 0

  1. Will bear no systematic or unsystematic risk: βˆ‘_iβ–’w_i * b_ij = 0 (For all K factors [i.e. no systematic risk] and w is small for all I [ unsystematic risk is fully diversified])
  2. Still earns a profit: βˆ‘_i w_i * Ri > 0

(w_i = the percentage of investment in security i)

17
Q

ICAPM vs APT:

  1. ICAPM hold for ? assets whereas APT only makes a statement about ? pricing of ?? portfolios.
  2. No special role for the ? portfolio in the APT.
  3. Motivation for ? is different.
A

ICAPM vs APT:

  1. ICAPM hold for all assets whereas APT only makes a statement about relative pricing of perfectly diversified portfolios.
  2. No special role for the market portfolio in the APT.
  3. Motivation for factors is different.