Lecture 3 Flashcards

1
Q

Assessment of Model fit

A
Compare to null model
Compare two models, e.g. :
- one where price is linear
- one where price is part-worth
Goodness of fit:
- Pseudo-R2
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Likelihood ratio test

A

• H0 = No differences between models
• Test statistic: Chisq = −2(LL(0) − LL(B))
- Check for significane

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Goodness of Fit: Pseudo-R2

A

R2 = 1 - (LL(B)/LL(0))
R2adj = 1 - (LL(B) - nparameters) /LL(0))
› Can be quite small, usually 0.2 to 0.4 can be considered acceptable
› Different interpretation than R2 in linear regression models

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Relative Attribute Importance

A

Measure of how much influence each attribute has on people’s choices
- Range of attribute / sum of all attribute ranges

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Willingness-to-Pay (WTP)

A
  • Requires linear model for price attribute
  • Utility of attribute / price coef.
  • Calculate for both attributes, calculate range and that is your willingness to pay
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

WTP Limitations

A
  • When respondents are not price sensitive (price vector = 0)
  • When respondents react positively to price increases
  • When extrapolating to prices that were not in the conjoint design
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Drawbacks of the Logit Model

A

Assumes Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives (IIA; “Red Bus / Blue Bus Problem”)
› Aggregate-level, “average” preferences, no preference heterogeneity across consumers

  • Latent Class Analysis: Preference Segmentation
  • Hierarchical Bayes Analysis: Individual preferences
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Preference heterogeneity

A

People have different preferences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Finite Mixture (Latent Class): Segment-level

A

§ Assumption of homogenous segments

§ Respondents j are allocated to segments i with certain probability (pij)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Latent Class Analysis (1/2)

A

› Assumes that the consumers belong to segments
› The mixing distribution f(β) is discrete, i.e., β can take a finite set of distinct values
› Suppose there are M segments that differ in preferences: β1, …, βM
› Consumer n belongs to each segment with a certain probability smn
àSegments are “latent”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Latent Class Analysis (2/2)

A
› “Optimal” number of segments...
• not known prior to the analysis
• not retrieved by the estimation method
› Solution:
• Estimate models for several number of segments
• Find best fit according to
• Log-likelihood-based measures, e.g., information criteria • Classification error
• Interpretability
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly