Lecture 3 Flashcards

1
Q

What are the 6 Bradford hill criteria ?

A

Consistency
Biological plausibility
Dose-response
Temoprality
Strength of the relationship
Reversibility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Consistency

A

if other studies in diff pops, at diff times, using diff methodologies find the same association it is more probable that the relationship is causal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Biological Plausibility

A

does the association make biological sense? Does it with with the natural history of the disease?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Dose-response

A

if increased levels of exposure lead to greater frequencies of the outcome it is more probable that the relationship is causal. Does not have to be cont there can be a threshold

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Temporality

A

if an exposure causes an outcome it must precede the outcome. This is the most important

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the most important bradford hill criteria?

A

temporality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Reversibility

A

if you take away the exposure do you see a reduction in the outcome. THis is not always possible to assess at the indv level
If an individual with lung cancer quits smoking their lung cancer might not go away but if you studied cancer incidence over the last 50 years as smoking rates have declined you would find that lung cancer incidence is also decling

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What must you do to determine a relationship is causal

A

bradford hill criteria

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Formulating a research question
SMART questions

A

specific - nuts and bolts
measurable
answerable- do you have the resources available
relevant-scientific community and to you
time- fit the frame in which you have to answer it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Elements to consider for specific questions

A

The PI(E)COD method

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

PI(E)COD

A

P: pop of interest
I: intervention? (if appropriate)
E: exposure of interest (if app)
C: control or comparison group
O: outcome?
D: Study design?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Ecological variables are properties of ____, _____, or_____

A

groups, organizations, places

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the 3 types of measures in ecological studies?

A

Aggregate
Environmental
Global

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Aggregate measures

A

summaries derived from individuals ina group (proportion of children in a household, median income)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Environmental measures

A

physical characteristics of a place (pollution level, hours of sunlight)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Global measures

A

Group level attributes with no distinct individual level analog (pop density, the availability of the healthcare system, the existence of traffic laws) Everyone in the group is subject to the same global measures

17
Q

Ecological fallacy

A

associations observed at the aggregate level do not reflect associations at the individual level

18
Q

Oilers and Flames example of the ecological fallacy

A

if the edmonton oilers were performing worse than the calgary flames across the NHL season it would be an ecological fallacy that all edmonton oiler players are worse players than all calgary flames players

19
Q

Atomistic fallacy

A

The opposite of the ecological fallacy where one assumes that associations found at the individual level also hold true at the group level

20
Q

3 pros of ecological studies

A

low cost
sometimes variables are impractical to measure at the individual level
sometimes the effect of interest is at the ecological scale (policy level effects)

21
Q

4 cons ecological studies

A

the temptation to extrapolate group effects to the individual (ecological fallacy)
issues in combining data sources
Temporal ambiguity. exposure or outcome first
Migration across groups. If individuals migrate from one group to another over the course of the study

22
Q

Is there as statistical test for causation?

A

no

23
Q

Causal associations

A

A change in frequency of the exposure causes a change in frequency from the outcome

24
Q

A necessary cause is ____ for an outcome to occure

A

required

25
Q

A sufficient cause

A

outcome may cause exposure but may not be the only cause