Lecture 2W: Basic Framework, Interpretation and Application of the Charter Flashcards
What is the 2 step process of interpreting the Charter?
1) the courts interpret the meaning of the right or freedom at issue to determine whether the matter complained constitutes an infringement. 2) whether the limits are justified under s.1 of the Charter as reasonable limits prescribed by law in a free and democratic society.
Who has the burden of proving the Charter is to be interpreted in a certain way?
The party seeking to uphold the Charter limitation
What was the significance of Hunter v Southam?
the SC first applied the ‘purposive approach’ to Charter interpretation
According to CJ Dickson, a Constitution is… which makes it distinguishable from ordinary statutes
A Constitution, by contrast, is drafted with an eye to the future. Its function is to provide a continuing framework for the legitimate exercise of gov’t power… It must therefore be capable of growth and development over time to meet new social, political and historical realities often unimagined by the framers
___ Is the standard approach for Constitutional inteprepation
A Purposive approach
in R v Big M Drug Mart it was said that a ___ interpretation should be…
The [purposive] interpretation should be… a generous rather than legalistic one, aimed at fulfilling the purpose of the guarantee and securing for individuals the full benefit of the Charter’s protection…
What is a secondary approach to Constitutional interpretation?
the contextual approach – this approach will often be used to impose definitional limits on Charter rights and when a court assess whether a limit on a Charter right is reasonable under s.1. This approach generally looks into the larger social and political context to determine whether a limitation on a Charter right is justified and reasonable under s.1.
In order of priority, what are the sources of Charter interpretation?
- The text of the Charter itself,
- Parliamentary debate
- International law, is considered persuasive but not binding
What are the 2 requirements of Sec1?
1) the requirement that all limits on rights be ‘prescribed by law,’ and 2) the requirement that limits be ‘reasonable’ and ‘demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society’.
What are the two requirements for the “prescribed by law” requirement of sec1?
1) is the limit on the right authorized by a ‘law’? and 2) does the law have the required degree of precision?
What was the significance of Greater Vancouver Transportation Authority v Canadian Federation of Students?
Detailed that the perscrbed by law requirement was meant to protect the public against arbitrary state action.
What was the significance of the Oakes test?
established the basic framework for the analysis on how limitation on rights (under s.1) are to be justified through the purposive approach
What are the steps of the Oakes Test?
In addition to the ‘prescribed by law’ requirement, there are four steps to the s. 1 analysis.
The objective of the measure must be important enough to warrant overriding a Charter right.
There must be a rational connection between the limit on the Charter right and the legislative objective.
The limit should impair the Charter right as little as possible.
There should be an overall balance or proportionality between the benefits of the limit and its deleterious effects.
True or false: A private business serving food in normal circumstances can run afoul of Charter protections.
False. The Charter only governs government action, or, enterprises operating on behalf of the government
What was the significance of McKinney v University of Guelph?
In this the issue raised was whether the Charter applied to universities and whether universities could be considered as gov’t actors under s.32. A majority found that they were not and so their adoption of mandatory retirement policies did not amount to gov’t action.