Lecture 21 Modern approaches to transgenesis Flashcards
happy fun time :)
disadvantages of generation of transgenic mice from ES cell modification via homologous recombination
laborious
time consuming
have to breed generations of mice, use different strains, pseudopregnant mice…
methods to try target genome sequences directly and more efficient?
-zinc finger nucleases (ZFN)
-transcription activator-like effector nuclease (TALEN)
-CRISPR/Cas9 systems
cas9 gRNA mediated cleavage?
Make up an RNP complex
-cas9 endonuclease
-+ a guide RNA (gRNA)
gRNA properties
should contain specific 20nt protospacer (the target sequence) which is designed to target upstream of Protospacer adjacent motif (PAM “NGG” N= any base nucleotide)
Cas9 properties
Endonuclease - recognises the PAM site upstream of gRNA target site and makes double-stranded breaks 3 nt upstream of PAM
3 scenarios after Cas9 and gRNA directed DNA cleavage
- Repaired by non-homologous end joining (NHEJ)
used for gene knockouts
(NHEJ can remove nucelotides in its repair process)
or
- Repaired by HDR (homology directed recombination, RecBCD -> RuvABC pathway):
use short oligonucleotides or DNA vectors with short homology arms that flank the cleavage site
used to introduce specific mutations, reporter (GFP…), or loxP sites (IDK) etc
OR
- Two gRNA sites can be chosen to delete large region of genome (i guess its then repaired by NHEJ)
genome editing with CRISPR/cas9?
Cas9 and gRNA injected into nucleus
repair in vivo using HR allows rapid generation of transgenic animals -introducing the new sequence into the site
multiple sites can be targeted in a single experiment
off target effects of Crispr/cas9
cas9/guideRNA cleavage is not absolutely specific
need to choose target sequences within genes with minimal homology to other genes/regulatory regions
mutant cas9 to reduce off target effects?
mutant cas9 nuclease “nickase” (cas9D10A) cleaves only one of the DNA strands
only a ssBreak
use 2 gRNAs specific for opposite strands of the DNA along with cas9D10A generates an overhang
NHEJ and HDR can be used to knockout/introduce respectively
Conditional genetics uses?
-Conditional deletion of a gene
>avouding early lethality of animal from mutation so effect can be analysed
>analysing role of gene in a defined cell type (cell specific inactivation)
>analysing the role of a gene at a certain developmental stage (inducible insctivation)
-permanently tag cells with a reporter gene to determine their fate
-to activate a mutation e.g. oncogene in a certain cell type
core of conditional genetics?
Site specific recombination (SSR)
can be driven in vivo by expressing Cre-recombinase from a transgene
loxP sites (SSR target sites) are previously inserted by gene targeting to flank a critical sequence (using cas9, or ES cell targeting but cas9 is better)
ssr of these head to tail lox9 sites excises the sequence from the genome
inducible deletion of genes
sometimes - gene only required at a certain stage of development or in adult animal
hence inducible deletor may be used
inducible deletor: Cre-ERT2 constructs
used to generate deletor in mice
Cre (recombinase?) fused to mutant estrogen ligand binding receptor domain (ERT2)
ERT2 responds to synthetic estrogen analogue - Tamoxifen
ERT2 keeps the Cre recombinase in the cytoplasm until tamoxifen is added
causes Cre-ERT2 to move to nucleus and cause recombination
inducible deletor/comditional genetics Small intestine self renewal example
trying to identify stem cells in intestinal crypt that renewed intestine cells
do they exist as stem cells?
specific population of cells at bottom of crypt expressing Lgr5, other cell types that dont
could it be Lgr5 in stem cells?
engineered Lgr5 mutant mouse - GFP reporter knocked into Lgr5 expression
expressed at bottom of crypt
this mouse was engineered so that:
Lgr5 promoter not only drove GFP expression but also Cre-ERT2 expression (through IRES to make multicistronic transcipt)
allows knowledge of where cre-ERT2 is expressed
had another LacZ transgene with a constitutive promoter that is expressed in all cells in the animal
has a repressor (stop cassette) of lacZ activation upstream of the LacZ sequence with lox9 sites flanking it
injection of tamoxifen activates Cre-ERT2 which excises stop cassette (through SSR) - allows LacZ expression
since Cre-ERT2 controlled by Lgr5 promoter - will only have Lacz expression in cells that express Lgr5
even when expression of Lgr5 is down regulated in daughter cells of Lgr5+ cell - LacZ expression will remain (constitutive promoter) so can see what cells are derived from the Lgr5+ cell line
injection of tamoxifen -> can then trace what cells come from stem cells (even when Lgr5 expression has stopped)
conclusion of small intestine self renewal experiment
the Lgr5+ cells are the stem cells at the bottom of the crypt (as it is shown that they give rise to other cells in small intestine from LacZ)
GFP expression shows that the Lgr5+ stem cells exist only in the crypt and their LacZ expressing (but GFP non-expressing) daughters move out