Lecture 2: Psychophysiological Measures Flashcards
Psychophysiology
The study of the natural (i.e. physical) basis of the mind
The branch of psychology that studies the relationship between ‘mind’ and ‘body’
Supplements standard psychological measurements (behavioural) with physiological measurements
Types of physiological measure
Physiological measures objectively record the real, automatic responses elicited in our body to psychological stimuli
Central Nervous System (brain & spinal cord)
effects on cognition and affect
hormonal responses
Peripheral Nervous system (nerves)
Somatic Nervous System
effects on movement
Autonomic Nervous System
effects associated with the “fight or flight” mechanisms
changes associated with fear, anxiety, arousal
Enteric Nervous System
effects on digestion
So why use them?
Physiological measures are: objective quantifiable hard to fake immune to response bias often unconscious
Autonomic measures
(Look at Powerpoint)
Autonomic reactions
Autonomic Arousal
orienting responses
changes in alertness, arousal, or attention
fight or flight reaction
a response to fear
readying the body for action via adrenaline, leading to increased heart rate, blood to muscles, breathing, etc.
Autonomic responses are not emotion-specific
Galvanic Skin Response (GSA, or electro-dermal activity (EDA)
Measures changes in the electrical resistance of the skin (or conductance: Biopacs use micro siemens as a measure)
Tiny changes in sweat gland activity cause rapid changes in skin electrical resistance
The more people sweat, the easier it is to conduct electricity across the skin (or the lower the resistance: why you don’t chuck a plugged-in kettle into your bathtub)
The sweat glands are controlled by the sympathetic nervous system and GSR can therefore measure subtle “fight or flight” type responses
GSR & refractory periods
When the sympathetic nervous system is activated by a stimulus (e.g. a fear provoking stimulus) it takes a little while to return to baseline (the refractory period)
So activity from previous stimuli can ‘contaminate’ later measures unless an appropriate time period is left between stimuli (an ‘Inter-Stimulus Interval, or ISI)
Breska, Maoz, & Ben-Shakhar (2011): random ISI between 8 & 12 s with a mean of 10 is sufficient: 16-24s (mean 20) gave slightly clearer results
Important to use a random ISI to prevent anticipatory responses
Heart Rate and ECG
Normal resting heart rate for healthy adults is between 70 and 75 beats per minute.
Heart rate is controlled by the autonomic nervous system
It can be measured by hand – i.e. by physically taking a pulse (inaccurate) - or electronically
ECG measurements record the whole of the cardiac cycle and allow a very accurate beat-to-beat measure
The Electrocardiogram
(Look at Powerpoint)
The Polygraph or ‘Lie Detector
The polygraph usually consists of:
GSR
Heart Rate
Respiration
Blood pressure
Ask 3 types of question requiring a yes/no response
Irrelevant
e.g. ‘Is your favourite colour red?’
Probable-lie control questions that most people will lie about
e.g. ‘Have you ever taken something that wasn’t yours?’
Relevant
e.g. ‘Did you steal the £10,000?’
The test is passed if the physiological responses during the Probable-lie questions is greater than during the Relevant questions
Example 1: guilt and innocence
Gamer et al. (2008) reported a study investigating the effectiveness of polygraph test in determining guilt, using a mock crime of theft
Method
Participants
108 participants in 3 groups:
‘guilty’ committed a mock-theft;
‘innocent-aware’ witnessed the theft
‘innocent-unaware’
Measured
Heart rate and GSR were measured while participants answered ten questions like this:
“What colour was the carpet in the room you stole the 50 EUR from? Was it … a) blue?, b) white?, c) yellow?, d) green?, e) red?, f) black?”
Participants were instructed to answer “no” each time, although one of the answers was relevant
Results
(Look at Powerpoint)
Conclusions from Gamer et al. (2008)
Significant differences between responses to relevant and irrelevant items were found for the “guilty” and “informed innocent” groups, with no such difference for the “innocent” group
The similarity between data for “guilty” and “informed innocent” groups suggests that the knowledge of crime details is a more important determinant of response than is actual execution of the crime.
Example 2: chocolate cravers
Rodriguez et al (2005) investigated the subjective and physiological reactivity to pictures of chocolate in high and low chocolate cravers
Method Participants 36 low and 36 high chocolate craving women Elicited a startle response and shown pictures Chocolate pictures Neutral Pictures Measured: GSR
Results
High cravers showed higher arousal to pictures of chocolate compared to neutral images
Low cravers showed the opposite
Conclusion:
High cravers show a selective arousal to images of chocolate that indicates that a distinct physiological/motivational state underlies the experience of chocolate craving