Lecture 2/Hedonics Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Why study it?

A

Pleasure we derive is important, we also plan our lives to pursue it. Other 2 overlap with hedonics (engagement and meaning). Aristotle thought the good life was a life of “virtue in action” and that pleasure when not part of a thoughtfully chosen virtuous action was often a distraction. When the extent of pleasant experiences, cognitive engagement, and meaning in life are pitted against one another, the latter two are more important than the former. But the pleasure we derive from subjective experiences remains important, and most of us both value and pursue feelings of happiness. Hedonic wellbeing also ripples outward to impact physical wellbeing, cognitive creativity, and social engagement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Gilbert’s definiton

A

Hedonic wellbeing for sure – talks about feelings.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is hedonic wellbeing?

A

1999 Daniel Kahneman proposed study of hedonics as what makes experiences and life pleasant or unpleasant. Hedonic wellbeing is thus the subjective experience of how one feels in the moment or how one feels about life as a whole. Hedonic wellbeing has 2 components: positive emotions and pleasant experiences. We pursue both.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Positive emotions are more than just happiness

A

Happiness/joy, contentment, amusement, wonder/awe, love, hope, relief, gratitude, anticipation, pride. Only thing in common is positive valence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Functional theory of emotions: emotions prepare us for action with specific action tendencies

A

Fear - escape, anger - attack, disgust - expel, guilt - make amends, shame - disappear, sadness - stillness/rethinking (think about what caused loss, functional as long as it doesn’t lead to depression). Negative emotions motivate you. Tiger going to eat you - fear, freeze/vigilant, attention to find an escape route. Going to eat kid - anger, prepare to fight off attack. If you like the tiger - no specific action.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

The broaden and build theory of positive emotions

A

Positive emotions increase the breadth of the momentary thought action repertoire and help to build psychological and social resources, and undo the effects of negative emotions. They don’t have specific actions, they give you options for what you can do (broaden) and build psychological resources (more generous, build social resources), undo biological effects of negative emotions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Two presumptions worth questioning?

A

Why do emotions have to spark specific actions or action tendencies? Do they have to be associated with urges towards physical action? Not always action, positive instances would be rarer in the ancestral environment, build resources to protect you, like intellectual resources- where are the berries? These resources make you more resilient. For instance joy might lead to play, interest to explore, contentment to savor, love to all of the above. They build durable personal resources - physical, social, intellectual, psychological.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Broadening hypothesis/study

A

Positive emotions broaden people’s attention and thinking. Between-participants manipulation: randomly assign to one of two emotions, contentment (low arousal), joy (high arousal), to neutral, to anger or to fear. Dependent measures were global vs local visual processing, global - triangle, local - squares. Engendered preference for global with positive emotion. Fear was higher than neutral though. Then breadth of thought-action repertoire: had them sum up the emotion they felt while watching the film (good manipulation check too), had them concentrate on the feeling they wrote and imagine it as vividly as possible, had them list all the things they want to do right now. Coded for breadth/diversity of action. Highest to lowest: joy, content, neutral, fear, anger.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Broadening and Aging Study

A

Isen - thought broadening sounded like cognitive flexibility (which lessens with age). Does positive mood increase cognitive flexibility? Old and young participants, random assignment, positive or neutral mood. DV: remote associates. In a neutral mood, the young people do better. In a positive mood, both do about the same. Old people think just as flexibly in a positive state (regardless of type of emotion). Also creative problem solving: assign young and old to do the candle problem and to positive or neutral mood. Young do better in neutral but old just as well in positive.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

The undoing hypothesis

A

If neg emotions narrow and pos broaden, then pos should be antidotes for lingering effects of negative emotions. Undoing study: speech anxiety, between-ps: contentment, joy, neutral, sadness (want to see things do better than sadness so it’s not just low arousal that mitigates stuff), something extra about the positive valence. DV: duration of cardiovascular reactivity. Responses to speech preparation: heart rate, finger pulse amplitude, pulse transit to finger, pulse transit to ear, diastolic BP, systolic BP. Duration of cardiovascular reactivity in order of shortest to longest: content, joy, neutral, sadness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Undoing hypothesis could help explain why pos emotions are good for health

A

Novitiate study (good for health psych because they live the same lifestyles basically). Coded personal essays for levels of positive emotion words. 678 sisters in 1932. Highest quartile living 10 years longer than lowest (Q1: 86.6, Q2:86.8, Q3:90.0, Q4:96.5). Coded on #of pos emotion words. So, something about positive emotionality seems protective. Baseball players: 1952 national baseball register, 230 photos coded for quality of smiles - no, partial, full Duchenne smile. 2009 - looked to see who had died and at what age. You see what you’d expect. Average joes Mroczek et al 2015 - 200 men studied from 1960s as part of an aging study - 8 days between 2002-2003 (mean age 73), daily reports of pain, physical symptoms, daily stressors, increase in negative emotions due to stressors, and decrease in positive emotions due to stressors. 10 year follow up - who died. Emotional reactivity (PA) predictive – positive emotions decreasing was more important than negative emotions increasing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Is happiness good for society?

A

Boost in positive emotions makes you more helpful. Happy people are more productive at work (longitudinal), more likely to pick up papers in airport. Happy people volunteer more often (longitudinal), more helpful with Isen’s phone booth study and the airport.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Are happy people less biased towards their own racial ingroup? Broadening and the own-race bias (ORB).

A

Not replicated again. All white participants, either get joy, neutral, or fear. Learning phase: 28 caucasian and black faces. Testing: 28 original faces, 28 foils. Recognition of black faces better in positive than in neutral or fear. More likely to process others as humans (normally easier to individuate members of your own group). Maybe happy people see others as part of their ingroup.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Why do positive emotions eliminate ORB?

A

Positive emotions may promote more holistic visual processing, but they may also build resources by creating a state of “social broadening” during which distinctions between social groups and between the self and others become less salient (people stick less to kin groups, two groups can come together when happy)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How to measure hedonics

A

Why so hard to measure? Anytime target of interest is subjective experience, really the only way to know is to ask people. But subjective experience is squishy: hard to capture in language, differs across time, differs across culture/people, even messier for pleasure/displeasure than it is for positive emotions (pos emotions - facial displays, neurochemical signals).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Problem 1

A

Language squishing versus experience stretching. Language squishing - they feel how you feel but talk about it differently. Experience stretching - talk about it the same way, but feel something different. Both could be and probably are true phenomena (why you can’t compare the experience of two individuals). But if you compare enough individuals, can still get a good average response to different conditions.

17
Q

Problem 2

A

Our memories are bad. People’s global evaluations of past affective episodes can be predicted by the affect experienced during two moments: the moment of peak affect intensity, and the ending. We’re often asking people how they felt a while ago or in the future. We don’t average out each day of an experience or each moment, we calculate on the most intense and last part. Daily diaries of vacations: average 5 remembered better if one day of 10 and positive last day than an average 8 with no peak and bad last day.

18
Q

Cold water experiement

A

Short trial - cold water for 60secs. Long trial - cold for 60secs, one degree warmer for additional 30secs. When given choice to repeat the study - 81% on the long trial. The duration of the experience was largely neglected. More favorable memory of longer trial because of lower pain at end.

19
Q

Colonoscopy duration

A

4 min or 67 min. For half - colonoscope in place for one minute longer. Duration neglect: prolonging the procedure had no impact on patients’ global evaluation of the experience. Global evaluations were correlated with the average pain reported on 2 occasions: at peak and just before end. 67 min was lower peak and end pain.

20
Q

Problem 3

A

Our forecasts are bad. Impact bias: we tend to overestimate the hedonic impact of future events like breakups, getting tenure, getting into grad school, gambling, infidelity, moving to CA, etc. We don’t take into account adaptation, and humans adapt very well. Gilbert. You go back to a set point, mundane pleasures are less pleasurable, there’s experience stretching/treadmill.

21
Q

Brickman et al 1978

A

Classic study in hedonics, less mundane pleasure enjoyment for lottery winners than controls. Probably experience stretching.

22
Q

Adaptation level theory/hedonic treadmill

A

On average, humans adapt to all good and bad things and then return to baseline. Over 65,000 respondents measured annually over 20 years - self-reported life satisfaction time lagged to certain events. Marriage and widowhood, up or down and then back.

23
Q

Problem 4

A

Culture. We don’t base life satisfaction on the same components across cultures. In individualistic cultures, the individual self (and subjective feelings) are weighted more heavily than in collectivist cultures (others, responsibilities, and duties are weighted more). 55,000 participants in World Values Study. Pos affect and life satisfaction correlation: 0.38 US, 0.45 Germany, 0.14 Japan, 0.09 India.

24
Q

Suh et al (1998)

A

Follow up study, 6,780 college students from around the world. Emotions vs norms in predicting life satisfaction. Collectivist - both predicted the same, Individualist and neutral - emotions predicted more. Emotions do contribute in collectivist, but norms matter as well.

25
Q

Hedonic wellbeing is overall good

A

Good for creativity, physical health, sociality, and helping behavior. Should we have an index of well-being like GDP? Other countries do like the UK, Bhutan, Thailand, India, S Korea. UN and OECD both conduct subjective well-being surveys in 140 countries. Robert Kennedy in 1968 talked about how GDP doesn’t measure the things that make life worthwhile. Arguments for one - can compare segments of society (like are single mothers less happy- what can we do about that?), compare across time, could structure policies around SWB and not just economic indicators. Obviously, good for science. How to measure though? Pleasant affect, unpleasant affect, life satisfaction, fulfillment or more specific states such as stress, affection, trust, joy. Or a more democratic version that lets people define SWB however they want - eudaimonically, hedonically, etc.