Lecture 2 - Communication Of Emotions Flashcards
Emotions are communicated how?
55% body language
38% speed tone and inflection
7% what we actually say
There are two main claims in psychology for the communication of emotions
Encoding hypothesis = when we feel a state it is encoded in a unique universal pattern
Decoding hypothesis = across cultures we have evolved to be able to quickly judge other people’s emotions
Co-evolution = out signalling capacity co evolved with the capacity of others to decode these signals
Non verbal behaviours
In order to help clarify the study of emotional communication Eckman and Freisen (1977) organised the non verbals into 5 categories;
Emblems, illustrators, regulators, self adaptors or manipulators and affective displays
Emblems
Gestures used to communicate e.g putting 2 fingers up to say fuck off. Emblems are very culturally specific. For example, putting 2 fingers up in the exact same way in Venezuela simply indicates the number two.
Illustrators
Gestures used to give visual imagery e.g. Pointing in a direction when saying “over there” or holding arms out wide when saying “this much”.
Regulators
Gestures used to indicate who speaks and who listens. E.g looking in someone’s eyes to indicate you are listening.
Self adaptors or manipulators
Random behaviours that we emit eg move leg, play with hair. These are simply nervous outcomes with no communicative value. Adaptors may be gestures that at one point were used for personal convenience but have turned into habit. They are linked with negative emotions such as anxiety.
Affect displays
Facial expressions such as smiling
Facial expressions of emotion - Eckman’s (1965) study
Argued that facial expressions of emotion are universal and these universal expressions are; anger fear disgust joy sadness and surprise.
Eckman developed the Facial Action Coding system to taxonomize every conceivable human facial expression of emotion.
He found 43 facial motions that each represent a possible emotion.
There are thousands of possible facial expressions but what sets them apart from facial expressions of emotion is; 1) symmetry 2) short in duration 1-5 seconds and 3) involve movement of reliable muscles.
These muscles are hard to use involuntarily thus are hard to fakely express
Eckman 1965 procedure and findings
Eckman got skilled actors that were able to move reliable muscles and took around 3000 pics
He took these pics to Chile Brazil Japan and Argentina and told them to match the pictures to the words of the 6 emotions.
Participants matched the words to pics with 80-90% accuracy - thus Eckman concluded these 6 emotions are indeed universal
Flaws of Eckman’s study 1965
1) forced choice - could of guessed 4/6 and had a 50% chance of getting last ones right
2) gradient critique - all the expressions should be recognised the same across cultures and they are not some are well recognised like happiness and others are not like surprise and fear
3) ecological validity - pictures were over the top and extreme done by actors - people are better at recognising dynamic displays
To over come the flaws in Eckman’s study he…
Eckman visited the Fore tribe (no previous contact with the modern world). He got a translator to tell the tribe emotion specific stories. Happy stories elicited smiles and sad stories elicited frowns. Eckman took pics of their emotional reactions and showed his college students. 60-70% accuracy apart from fear and surprise. Suggests that emotions may be universal.
Are women better at recognising facial expressions of emotions?
Bos et al (2016) found that on average women outperform men. It is suggested this is due to testosterone. A single administration has been demonstrated to reduce emotional recognition in females.
Cultural variation of facial expressions of emotion - ritualised displays
Some cultures may exaggerate and dramatise facial expressions of emotion. E.g
17th century samurai wives - smile on death
Briggs (1970) - eskimos do not display anger
Hareli et al (2015) - Greek are better at using facial expression of sadness as a sign of norm violation
Cultural variation of facial expressions of emotion - regulation of expressive behaviour
Matsumoto et al (1977) - American and Japanese students watched disgusting in private low light or high light with authority figure. In private both students showed universality of facial expressions however in public US students showed more intense expressions with Japanese students changing from disgust to a more polite one.
Matsumoto et al (2009) -
Also studied thousands of photographs taken at the 2004 Athens olympics. Athletes initial emotional expressions to winning or losing were universal however their subsequent expressions were culturally regulated. Cultural influences tended to kick in 1-2 seconds after. The initial facial reaction is triggered automatically by subcortical brain structures before more culturally specific modifications are applied by the motor cortex