Lecture 2 B Flashcards

1
Q

What is the purpose of PIPEDA in Canada?

a) To regulate privacy laws for government agencies

b) To protect employee privacy in federally regulated businesses

c) To allow employers to monitor employees without consent

d) To regulate criminal data collection

A

b) To protect employee privacy in federally regulated businesses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Which of the following provinces has privacy laws similar to PIPEDA?

a) Ontario

b) Manitoba

c) Quebec

d) Saskatchewan

A

c) Quebec

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

The Privacy Act (1985) governs the collection and use of personal information by:

a) Private sector businesses

b) Provincial governments

c) The federal government

d) Municipal corporations

A

c) The federal government

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Under PIPEDA, how many Fair Information Principles are there?

a) 5

b) 7

c) 10

d) 12

A

c) 10

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Which of the following is NOT a Fair Information Principle under PIPEDA?

a) Accountability

b) Consent

c) Unlimited collection

d) Individual access

A

c) Unlimited collection

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

According to PIPEDA, employers must:

a) Collect as much data as possible on employees

b) Obtain consent before collecting personal information

c) Monitor all employees at all times

d) Share employee data with third parties

A

b) Obtain consent before collecting personal information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is a key legal test for justifying workplace surveillance?

a) The necessity and proportionality test

b) The employer’s authority test

c) The implied consent test

d) The corporate privacy test

A

a) The necessity and proportionality test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

In Eastmond v. Canadian Pacific Railway, CP Railway installed cameras to:

a) Improve employee productivity

b) Monitor workers at all times

c) Prevent theft and vandalism

d) Track employee behavior for promotions

A

c) Prevent theft and vandalism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

In R v. Cole (2012), the Supreme Court ruled that:

a) Employees have no privacy rights on work computers

b) Employees may have some privacy on work computers

c) Employers own all employee data

d) Work-issued laptops cannot be used for personal purposes

A

b) Employees may have some privacy on work computers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What factor did the Supreme Court consider in R v. Cole?

a) Whether the employer had a policy on computer use

b) Whether the employee had a reasonable expectation of privacy

c) Whether the search violated Charter rights

d) All of the above

A

d) All of the above

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

If an employer finds inappropriate files on an employee’s work-issued computer, what is the key legal question?

a) Did the employee consent to monitoring?

b) Was the file search necessary and within policy?

c) Did the employer pay for the device?

d) Did the employee break company rules?

A

b) Was the file search necessary and within policy?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What Canadian law protects employees from workplace discrimination?

a) The Privacy Act

b) The Human Rights Code

c) The Copyright Act

d) The Taxation Act

A

b) The Human Rights Code

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Which of the following is a protected characteristic under Canadian human rights laws?

a) Job title

b) Work experience

c) Gender identity

d) Attendance record

A

c) Gender identity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

In Arunachalam v. Best Buy (2010), the employee faced harassment due to:

a) Age

b) Pregnancy

c) Disability

d) Race

A

b) Pregnancy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What damages did the tribunal award Arunachalam in the Best Buy case?

a) Punitive damages

b) Aggravated damages

c) $4,000 for injury to dignity and self-respect

d) Reinstatement to her job

A

c) $4,000 for injury to dignity and self-respect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Non-pecuniary damages compensate for:

a) Lost wages

b) Emotional distress and suffering

c) Legal fees

d) None of the above

A

b) Emotional distress and suffering

17
Q

Aggravated damages are awarded when:

a) An employer acts in a particularly cruel or humiliating way

b) An employee loses money due to discrimination

c) A company makes a financial mistake

d) The employee is unable to find a new job

A

a) An employer acts in a particularly cruel or humiliating way

18
Q

Punitive damages are meant to:

a) Compensate for emotional distress

b) Punish the employer for malicious, reckless, or illegal actions ✅

c) Cover lost wages and benefits

d) Help employees find new jobs

A

b) Punish the employer for malicious, reckless, or illegal actions

19
Q

Which of the following is an example of aggravated damages?

a) An employee being compensated for job loss

b) An employer firing an employee in an insulting and humiliating way

c) A workplace disagreement

d) A boss providing constructive criticism

A

b) An employer firing an employee in an insulting and humiliating way

20
Q

Which damages are awarded to punish the employer and deter misconduct?

a) Compensatory damages

b) Non-pecuniary damages

c) Punitive damages

d) Nominal damages

A

c) Punitive damages

21
Q

Which of the following best describes the Supreme Court’s reasoning in R v. Cole regarding workplace privacy?

a) Employees have no reasonable expectation of privacy on employer-issued devices.
b) Workplace policies can eliminate an employee’s expectation of privacy entirely.

c) Workplace policies can reduce, but not completely eliminate, an employee’s expectation of privacy.

d) Employees cannot challenge an employer’s access to work devices.

A

c) Workplace policies can reduce, but not completely eliminate, an employee’s expectation of privacy.

22
Q

Under the legal test used in Eastmond v. Canadian Pacific Railway, which of the following is NOT a factor for justifying workplace surveillance?

a) Whether the measure is necessary to address a specific need.

b) Whether the employer owns the workplace premises.

c) Whether the surveillance is proportionate to the problem.
d) Whether there is a less intrusive way to achieve the same goal.

A

b) Whether the employer owns the workplace premises.

23
Q

If an employer wishes to monitor employee emails under PIPEDA, what is a key requirement?

a) Employees must sign a waiver relinquishing all privacy rights.

b) The employer must have a clear policy and obtain employee consent.

c) Employers can monitor emails at any time without restriction.

d) The employer must notify employees only if emails contain personal data.

A

b) The employer must have a clear policy and obtain employee consent.

24
Q

In what situation would a company installing hidden cameras in the workplace likely violate employee privacy rights?

a) If the cameras are used to monitor cash registers for theft.

b) If the cameras are placed in break rooms or private spaces without notice.

c) If employees have previously been informed about surveillance.

d) If the company experiences financial losses due to employee misconduct.

A

b) If the cameras are placed in break rooms or private spaces without notice.

25
Which of the following scenarios would most likely constitute constructive dismissal under Canadian employment law? a) An employer significantly reduces an employee’s salary and creates a toxic work environment, forcing them to resign. b) An employer gives an employee a poor performance review based on objective criteria. c) A company eliminates an employee’s position due to restructuring. d) An employer implements a new dress code that applies to all employees equally.
a) An employer significantly reduces an employee’s salary and creates a toxic work environment, forcing them to resign. ✅
26
Which of the following could be considered both workplace harassment and discrimination? a) An employer provides unfairly negative feedback to an underperforming employee. b) A manager repeatedly mocks an employee’s disability in front of colleagues. c) An employee is denied a promotion due to a lack of qualifications. d) A company enforces a strict attendance policy for all employees.
b) A manager repeatedly mocks an employee’s disability in front of colleagues. ✅
27
In Arunachalam v. Best Buy, what was a key reason that the employer was found liable for harassment but not discrimination? a) The company had no clear policies on workplace harassment. b) The employee was harassed due to pregnancy but was dismissed for performance-related reasons. c) The employer fired the employee explicitly due to pregnancy. d) The employee was denied maternity leave benefits.
b) The employee was harassed due to pregnancy but was dismissed for performance-related reasons. ✅
28
What was the Supreme Court’s main reasoning in R v. Cole when determining whether the evidence from the work laptop should be excluded? a) The employee had no expectation of privacy since the laptop was employer-owned. b) The police violated the employee’s Charter rights by seizing the laptop without a warrant. c) The IT department’s actions were illegal under PIPEDA. d) The employee consented to data monitoring under his contract.
b) The police violated the employee’s Charter rights by seizing the laptop without a warrant. ✅
29
Which of the following best describes the “necessity and proportionality test” used to evaluate workplace surveillance? a) It assesses whether an employee’s actions justify monitoring. b) It determines whether surveillance is necessary, effective, and minimally invasive. c) It grants employers unlimited access to monitor employees. d) It only applies to federal government employees.
b) It determines whether surveillance is necessary, effective, and minimally invasive. ✅
30
Under employment law, which of the following factors could justify an employer’s decision to terminate an employee despite their belonging to a protected class? a) Documented poor performance and inability to meet job requirements. b) The employee’s supervisor personally dislikes them. c) The employee took medical leave for a short period. d) The employee filed a human rights complaint against the company.
a) Documented poor performance and inability to meet job requirements.