lecture 2 - Agression risk factors Flashcards

1
Q

how does agression develop

A

Aggression development - interplay between intrapersonal
and environmental factors.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

agression risk factors
-in child (characteristics)
-in family

A

the child
- Temperament, executive functioning, and emotion dysregulation.
- Social Information Processing (SIP).

the family
- Coercive home environment and parenting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

risk factor - child
how can tempermant cause a child to respond

A

Tendency to respond in a certain way across situations.
* Considered a precursor of personality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

when do differences in tempermant emerge

A

Individual differences in temperament emerge very early and remain relatively stable over time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what are the five major attributies in babies for tempermanet

A

Five major attributes in babies:
* Activity level; Irritability; Soothability; Fearfulness; Sociability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is ‘difficult tempermant’ associatied with
-Loeber and Hay 1997

A

Difficult temperament” associated with higher rates of mother-child
conflict. Discipline techniques partly influenced by infant’s temperament, part by parent’s temperament

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what are 3 clusters of tenpermant traits that raise the risk in agression?

A

1.Tendency for dysregulated
and negative emotional
reactions
* Control of anger and frustration
is a major achievement in early
socialisation, by middle
childhood (6-12 years).
* Reactive more than proactive
aggression

  1. Fearlessness, daring, sensation-seeking.
  2. Low prosociality.
    * Less respect for rules
    * Less empathy or care for others
    * Less guilt
    * Proactive more than reactive
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Tendency for dysregulated
and negative emotional
reactions
-evidence

A

Ostrov et al. (2023) found emotion dysregulation to be a key risk factor in reactive and proactive physical and relational aggression.

  • 300 children age 3-5 years in pre-school and school, over 4 years.
  • Free-play observations (trained researchers).
  • Teacher ratings of: emotion dysregulation, empathy, rules response, fearlessness & daring.
  • Physiological (skin conductance, (can direct measure how physically aroused or active a child is ) breathing- resting state arousal).

-children who

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what is emotional dysregulation

A

inability to control and modulate emotional reactions. Especially
problematic when those behaviours violate social norms.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what is the role of the executive function
-inhibition
-working memory updating
-shifting
-planning

-development of prefrontal cortex

A
  • Inhibition: restraint of motor or verbal responses.
  • Working memory updating: hold and manipulate information over short periods of time.
  • Shifting: alternate between mental rule states or tasks.
  • Planning: goal-directed action.
  • Development of prefrontal cortex. Different EF functions develop at different rates/stages.
    Rademacher et al., (2023). Rohlf et al. (2018)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

how does agression and executive function correlate

A

EF deficits in early childhood correlate with increased risk of
aggressive behaviours.

  • Difficulties regulating behaviour, especially anger and irritation.
  • Physical aggression mainly; relational findings mixed.
  • Reactive more than proactive aggression (Rohlf et al., 2018).
  • Impulsivity, lack of ability to plan and inhibit potent responses.
  • Development of greater cognitive control in adolescence shown to
    protect against tendency for maladaptive anger responses.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

emotion dysregulation
-anger induction study Krahe 2020
-what were the two behaviour classifications

A

-children between 6 and 10 asked to build a tower of bricks and told that they could win an attractive prize if they succeeded.
-To induce anger, the researchers manipulted the bricks so that the tower kept collapsing.
-the same children were studied again 3 years later with an age adapted version of the tower building task.

Two behaviour classifications:
1. Maladaptive: venting anger, focus
on the frustrating blocks.
2. Adaptive: solution seeking.

  • More maladaptive anger correlated with higher teacher ratings of physical and relational aggression 6 months
    and 2 years later.
  • Also predicted problems with friends
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

social infromation processing

A

Accurate processing of social information is crucial for human interaction
and adequate socialization.
* understand others’ intent, emotions, messaging.
* take into account contextual factors.
* decide how to respond to them.

Problems arise when there is misunderstanding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

how can social information processing affect agression

A

Social Information Processing difficulties can make it hard for certain children to find non-aggressive solutions to problems (Dodge & colleagues)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

social information processing model (SIP)
-How do children choose aggressive
versus nonaggressive solutions to social problems?
stages 1 and 2

A

Reactive Aggressors:
* Stages 1 & 2.
* Expect intent was negative (Hostile Attribution Bias) - starts to influnece and heighten an angry response
* Search and find social cues to confirm this: self-fulfilling cycle.
* Rapid angry response.
* Age-related.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

social information processing model (SIP)
-stages 3 and 4

A

Proactive Aggressors:
* Stages 4-6.
* Less expectation of hostility.
* Logical assessment that aggressive response would be most effective.
* Confident of positive outcome.

17
Q

how was the SIP model originally developed, and how has it been since then

A

SIP model originally developed within a social-cognitive framework.
Since&raquo_space; Integrated model of SIP and emotion (Lemerise & Arsenio,
2000).

18
Q

Social Information Processing & Emotion Dysregulation
-how is the SIP model and hostile attribution bias infleunced ?

A
  • Each step of the SIP model can be influenced by individual differences emotionality (traits) and emotion regulation ability.
  • Current emotional state may drive what social cues are more salient and how they are interpreted.
  • Overwhelmingly strong emotions that are hard to control can impair ability to focus on alternative interpretations of and responses to a situation.
  • Emotionality, inadequate emotion understanding, and poor emotion regulation ability are associated with increased hostile attribution bias
19
Q

what is considered breeding grounds of agression in a

A

A coercive home environment :

  • Out of control behaviour, unruly, defiant.
  • Atypical family environment.
  • Social climate the child feeds into.
  • Constant struggle and conflict.
  • Little talk, mostly negative talk.
  • Negative reinforcement maintains this environment.
    See Shaffer textbook, chapter 14
20
Q

example of coercive home environment

A
  • Girl teases older brother. He
    yells back. (Negative
    reinforcement.)
  • Girl calls brother nasty
    name. Boy chases and hits
    her.
  • Girls stops calling him names (his hitting negatively reinforced). She
    whines, hits back, he withdraws (her hitting negatively reinforced).
    Boy hits sister again. Escalates
    -Mum intervenes but children won’t listen because too emotionally
    charged. So mum turns to punishment and coercion
    -* Fighting stops (reinforcing mum’s coercive methods).
  • Children whine, cry, yell at mum.
  • If mum backs off these behaviours are reinforced.
  • Next time mum is even more likely to use coercion.
  • Child counter-coercion to get her to back off.
  • Unpleasant family atmosphere.
21
Q

parenting styles and agressive behaviour

A

Parenting styles act as a risk or a
protective factor for the
development of aggressive
behavior problems in children.”
(Rademacher et al., 2023)

-eg authorattative parenting
-authoratarian (considerred risk factor)
-permissive
-neglectful

22
Q

two dimensions of coercive parenting

A
  1. Parental Warmth: protective factor.
    * Affection, support, and acceptance of the child’s experience and behaviour.
    * Positive socio-emotional resources and role modelling.
  2. Behaviour control/coercion: risk factor.
    * Harsh and controlling, strict rules and punishments.
    * Negative interactions promote antisocial behaviour, learned and transferred
    outside the home.

Rademachar et al. (2023)

23
Q

parenting and link to emotional dysregulation

A

Coercive parenting associated with child emotion dysregulation.
* Strong regulation pressures from caregivers, fixed limits.
-recurring confrontation and negativitiy
-high negative arousal in the child
-harder to learn anf enact better controlled and non agressive behaviours during chalenging situations

24
Q

parental warmth and emotional regulation link

A

Parental warmth promotes good emotion regulation development.
* Fosters trust, easier to regulate appropriately, psychological safety.