Lecture 2 Flashcards
moral hazard
A situation in which one party gets involved in a risky event knowing that it is protected against the risk and the other party will incur the cost.
4 criterions on information asymmetry in agent theory
Hidden characteristics, hidden information, hidden action, hidden intention
Hold up problem
The hold-up problem is a situation where two parties may be able to work most efficiently by cooperating but refrain from doing so because of concerns that they may give the other party increased bargaining power and thus reduce their own profits.
What did Jensen (1989) say?
LBO is better adapt to deal with agency problems than listed firm. He says that a listed firm has problems with the payout of free cash flow. This is overcome through the LBO governance model.
Three typical moral hazard situations in financing companies
- consumption on the job (misdeployment of assets)
- being one’s own boss (misguided effort)
- establishing a track record (misguided effort)
Characteristics of public corporations concerning governance
- Dispersed public ownership
- Managers without substantial equity shareholdings
- Board of Directors dominated by outsiders
Pros and cons of public corporation structure
Advantage: risk diversification across households and institutional investors through public stock markets
Disadvantage: conflicts of interest between risk bearers and decision-makers
Jensen’s 4 forces that should control management to act in the investor’s interest
- product markets (competition)
- internal control systems (supervisory boards)
- legal/political/regulatory system
- capital markets (investors)
When are Jensen’s four forces effective and when not?
Agent principal alignment in high-growth industries as there are more positive NPV investment opportunities than free cash flow internally
Misalignment in low-growth or declining sectors as managers often waste cash flow through organizational slack or investments in negative NPV projects.
Free cash flow
Cash flow in excess of that required to fund all positive NPV projects. So you first finance your positive NPV projects and if cash is left that is called free cash flow.
What do efficient and shareholder value-maximizing companies do with the free cash flow?
Distribute free cash flow to investors (pay out as dividends)
Why are managers incentivizes to retain cash and engage in empire building?
- increases autonomy vis-á-vis the capital markets (for future financing needs)
- increases firm size, even beyond optimal size. Size enhances social prominence, public prestige and political power. Management income is often related to increases in company size rather than value.
Examples of the disciplining effect of debt
- increases the debt-to-equity ratio –> solves free cash flow problem
- financing through debt introduces the legal obligation to meet periodic payments
- managerial discretion is reduced and managers are forced to skip negative NPV investments
- violation of debt covenants creates board-level crisis and urges to review management and strategy
Role of PE firm in LBO
sponsors transactions, counsels and monitors managment
Role of company management in LBO
holds substantial equity stakes and stay in buyout company