Lecture 14: Critical Thinking About Statistical Inferences Flashcards

1
Q

Explain the 3 steps of the Fisher approach to significance testing

A
  1. Formulate H0
  2. Report the exact level of significance (p-value), without further discussion about accepting or rejecting hypotheses
  3. Only do this if you know almost nothing about the subject (devil’s advocate)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Explain the 3 steps of hypothesis testing according to the Neyman-Pearson approach

A
  1. Formulate two statistical hypotheses, determine alpha, beta and N for the experiment
  2. If the data falls in the H1 rejection region, assume H2 (this does not mean that you believe H2, only that you behave as if H2 is true)
  3. Only use this procedure if there is a clear disjunction and if a cost-benefit assessment is possible
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Explain the 3 steps of the null ritual (what we do now)

A
  1. Set up a statistical null hypothesis of “no mean difference” or “zero correlation”. Don’t specify predictions of your research hypothesis or of any alternative substantive hypotheses
  2. Use 5% as a convention for rejecting the null. If significant, accept your research hypothesis
  3. Always perform this procedure
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the differences between fisher and neyman-Pearson

A

Fisher did not talk about accepting/rejecting hypotheses, neyman-Pearson did
Fishers approach works only if you know almost nothing about the subject, neyman-Pearson only works if there is a clear disjunction and if a cost-benefit assessment is possible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are 4 fallacies of statistical inference

A
  1. P-values equal the probability that the (null)hypothesis is true
  2. Alpha equals the probability of making an error
  3. Failing to reject H0 is evidence for H0
  4. Power is irrelevant when results are significant
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is subjective probability

A

Probability is the degree of belief that something is the case in the world, a degree of uncertainty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is objective probability

A

Probability is the extent to which something IS the case in the world (more about facts than about beliefs), it expresses the relative frequency in the long term

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Explain the two points of the first fallacy

A

Statements in which alpha, power and p-values occur relate to frequentist or objective probabilities.
Statements in which alpha, power and p-values occur relate to conditional probabilities.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Explain how Bayes differs from frequentist probabilities

A
  1. It talks about subjective probabilities (degrees of belief)
  2. You can quantify the probability of a certain hypothesis
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Explain the term credibility in context of Bayes

A

It is the degree of belief that a certain possibility (hypothesis) is true

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the likelihood

A

How predictive the different hypotheses are of the data; how likely are the data given a certain hypothesis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What component of the Bayes theorem formula P(A|B) = P(B|A)*P(A)/P(B) is the likelihood

A

P(B|A)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What component of the Bayes theorem formula P(A|B) = P(B|A)*P(A)/P(B) is the prior

A

P(A)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What component of the Bayes theorem formula P(A|B) = P(B|A)*P(A)/P(B) is the marginal probability

A

P(B)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the prior

A

The degree to which we believe something to be the case before we start doing analysis (before we have seen the data)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the marginal likelihood

A

How likely is the probability of the data irrespective of which hypothesis we are assuming/looking at (general prediction —> how much more predictive of the data is this assumption over any other assumptions we could make

17
Q

What does it mean when the prior distribution is flat? What does it mean for the degree of belief when the distribution gets more narrow?

A

When the distribution is flat, this means that the we believe that the probabilities of all our hypotheses are equally likely
When the distribution gets more narrow, that means that we have a stronger degree of belief that that is the population parameter

18
Q

What is the Bayes factor

A

It reflects a likelihood ratio, so how much more probable is the data given one parameter compared to the other —> this enables you to quantify evidence for or against a hypothesis which is useful when testing hypothesis

19
Q

Why is the power still relevant if we reject the H0 (when results are significant)

A

Because the rejection of the H0 is less informative when the power is low (higher chance of being wrong in rejecting the H0)