Lecture 13: The Quests for Jesus Flashcards
What did Schweitzer believe the important part of Jesus’s message was?
That we should prepare for the coming of God by repenting.
Who believed Jesus was a failed messianic prophet who failed to change history?
Albert Schweitzer
Describe form criticism.
It seeks to get behind the written sources of the Bible to discover the original oral forms that were eventually written down.
Who developed the criteria of dissimilarity and coherence, and in which movement?
Norman Perrin in the Second Quest
What did Bultmann believe was the significance of the cross and resurrection?
We should believe the cross allows us to die to the false security of the world by being crucified in the present and radically align ourselves with God.
The Jesus Seminar believed these passages were spoken by Jesus or added by an editor?
- Turn the other cheek
- Love your enemies
- The good Samaritan
Spoken by Jesus
What did scholars realize by the Third Quest?
We must understand Jesus in his Jewish context.
What did Bultmann believe with regard to the resurrection’s historicity?
There was no resurrection. It is not possible scientifically nor something we can know as historical fact.
What methodology did the Jesus Seminar use?
It assumed all statements attributed to Jesus were inauthentic until proven otherwise. It also followed methodological naturalism.
The Jesus Seminar believed any claims of divinity were spoken by Jesus or added by an editor?
Added by an editor
Give five criticisms of the Jesus Seminar.
- Rejections a priori
- Jesus would not have been crucified
- Gospel of Thomas
- Only liberal scholars on the project
- Jesus not Jewish enough
What does redaction criticism believe about the gospel accounts?
They give information about the theology of the early church rather than the teaching of Jesus.
Who first came up of the idea of the New Testament as myth?
D. F. Strauss
The Jesus Seminar used what questionable source?
The Gospel of Thomas, a Gnostic work written in Coptic
Before Strauss, what two options existed for interpreting miracles in the New Testament?
They either happened as described or could be rationally explained.