Lecture 13: Descent in to the Icehouse Flashcards
What happened to the continental land masses in the Cretaceous-Cenozoic transition?
They slid across the planet to positions more recognised today
What happened to India in the Cretaceous-Cenozoic transition?
Over a period of 90-20mya it travelled to the continent of Asia from deep south.
What happened as a result of India colliding with Asia?
formation of Himalayas and Tibetan Plateau
What is the Himalayan uplift hypothesis?
The uplift of these mountains caused the physical and silicate weathering to increase
What effect would the increased weathering rate have on global climate?
reduced GHG, increased cooling. Much later reversed by negative feedback between cooling and temperature (colder means less weathering
What happens to carbon that is weathered out of the earth rocks? What does it lead to in oceans?
It combines with the precipitation to form an acid where it flows in rivers increasing weathering rates which releases ions such as calcium and magnesium. When both ions and carbon enter the ocean biology combine them to form carbonates
What evidence was found by France-Lanord and Derry (1997) that confirmed that silicate weathering was taking place as a result of the Himalayan formation?
Discovery of ions in the river and (inorganic) carbon in the channel that would then flow out in to the oceans to form carbonates
What did France-Lanord and Derry (1997) propose was however a bigger burial of carbon?
More (organic) carbon was buried and prevented from interacting with interacting with the atmosphere through sediment burial.
Where and how was the organic carbon in the Ganges and Brahmaputra buried?
the clay and gravel eroded from the channel would either contain organic carbon in it or when it would reach the deltas it would bury the organic carbon that was stationed down on the delta. Either way the organic carbon would be buried and prevented from interacting with the atmosphere
Furthermore, what undermined the theory proposed by France-Lanord and Derry (1997) about how the formation of the Himalayas would increase weathering?
The erosion rate, in light of long-term geological calibration and contextualisation, does not appear to have increased.
What explanation was provided for why the Himalayas had not increased weathering rates?
It had been counterbalanced by an increasingly cooler and drier climate that are not ideal conditions for weathering
What was another piece of evidence that undermined the suggestion that the Himalayan formation had increased silicate weathering and led to the reduction of atmospheric carbon?
Carbon dioxide concentration records appeared to have been relatively stable over a long time period
What date is atmospheric CO2 estimated to have reached the present level?
25mya
What evidence is there that suggests there must be another factor other than CO2 influencing the climate?
There have been times when the temperature and CO2 records appeared to diverge.
- CO2 stabilised from 25mya, while climate fluctuated
- Early record (Oligocene) there was a massive CO2 peak, while temperature decreased
What might explain why there does not appear to be a matching up of CO2 and climate record, other than they are not related?
It is dependant upon pockets of previous evidence which are difficult to find and analyse.
What are the two ways CO2 is proxied?
Foraminifera: shell formation consists of carbon
Fossil Stomata: When CO2 is low, plants have more stomata, when high CO2 less stomata