Lecture 12 - Reserve design Flashcards
a, B, y diversity
alpha = within sites Beta = turnover across sites gamma = total biodiversity
single large vs several small
if species richness increases with area, larger block would support more species
all small reserves have same species
single large = more sites doesn’t add more species
small reserves differ in composition
several small = protects more if there is turnover
- complementary communities
- allows escape from diminishing return
Quinn said …
many small accumulate species faster than single largest
Lomolino …
examined small - large, large - small, complementarity (optimal choice), random pick
- optimal choice = less land to represent all sp.
- small - large = comparable, but often no better than random pick
several small better for max diversity if…
sites complementary
Global conservation strategies - protected areas
- 5% land surface
- many sp. not protected = 20% terrestrial verts, 1500 amphibians
conservation areas opportunistically set up
unwanted land
- US reserves = high elevation, poor productive soils
- choosing a-diversity (local richness) ignores B (community dissimilarity)
- should be sites that protect complementary sets
conservation international biod hotspots
34 - 2.3% land surface
- 50% plants, 42% t.verts
- complementarity more effective = more species in smaller area
edge area ratio
more several small, elongated shapes
- single large better = protects core, avoid fragmentation
persistence
presence doesn’t ensure future persistence
- Allee effects = v small pops at risk, death > birth
- single large better
disturbance
unpredictable events may drive extinction
- spatial distribution of disturbance relative to SLOSS
- depends on whether probabilities in small reserves in independent
- probability theory = events independent, probability of both occurring is a x b
simple models - parameters (disturbance)
- logistic growth in patches
- carrying capacity K proportional to patch area
- each year, probability of fire wiping out pop
- if several small far enough apart = probabilities independent
role of dispersal
indvs may disperse between sites
- fire - can be recolonized
- increase persistence = allows recolonisation, recovery
spacing between reserves
- far enough so disturbances independent
- close enough for dispersal and recolonisation
several small best for
max diversity
persistence if disturbances independent and dispersal happens
single large best for
minimise edge effects
supports larger pops, longer term persistence