Lecture 12 Flashcards
What are the 2 opposite arguments about the financial openness (globalisation) ?
- supply side = state is dead
2. demand side = long live the state
Explain the supply side argument about globalisation
According to the supply side argument, the globlisation undermines (affaiblir) autonomy. Capital mobility implies the search for always higher yields (money is going where the profit is the highest), which means countries are in tax competition, leading to deregulation and the decline of labor unions.
What are the implications of the supply side argument ?
There is a shift of burden from the corporations to the citizens. Taxation, labour regulations and environmental regulations represent obstacles to profit so they will be reduced. –> there is a race to the bottom.
Moreover there is also a problem of government accountability: if the citizens demand something, governement cannot always provides it.
What is the critique of the supply side argument ?
An investor cares about political risks in emerging markets. There is also a higher risk of crisis.
Explain the demand side argument about globalisation
The argument is that compensation is the prerequisite for openness. Indeed, globalization increases social risk. The causal mechanism:
There is a social risk > population objects trade > governement needs to insure voters against risk thanks to compensation > population supports openness.
What are the implications of the demand side argument ?
This perspective implies the prevalence of welfare state. There should not be a “race at the bottom”. Left parties should benefit from globalisation as they should offer the policy needed by the loosers. Therefore democracy should works.
What is the critique of the demand side argument ?
This perspective ignores economic constraints and assume international cooperation.
What supports the demand side argument ?
In a study by Rodrik there is a strong correlation between openness and governement spending.
What found out Rhem in his study about demand for compensation ?
Rhem studied the relation between the demand for compensation and 4 characteristics:
1. household income
2. educational degree
3. occupational unemployment rate
4. skill specificity
He found out that
- the bigger the household income, the smaller will be the demand for compensation
- the higher the educational degree, the smaller will be the demand for compensation
- the higher the unemployment rate, the bigger will be the demand for compensation
- the higher the skill specificity, the bigger will be the demand for compensation
Which study supports that there is no decline in state capacity
Looking at the fiscal policies, Garrett and Swank demonstrate that there is an increase of corporate tax rates and an increase in governement spending. Consequently there is no decline in state capacity.
What can we critique about Garrett and Swank study ?
Their study is too old (1998). Indeed, since the 1990s, government spending has declined.
What demonstrates the study of Hays and Franzese ?
The governement spending declined and we see a shift in the tax burden: capital is less taxed compared to the labor. This argument speaks for the supply side argument.
Do elections have effects on the financial markets ?
According to Mosley the investors care less about policy variation but more about headline indicators (microevidence).
However a study by Sattler and Phillips found the contrary. Indeed, they demonstrated that markets responded strongly to politics (macroevidence).
In developing countries on what do influence trade and finance ?
Trade only effects pensions, health and education as it low social spending. (Kaufman)
Spending and labor institutions: according do Rudra, globalization clearly affects welfare spending. The varable that determines the changes in the spending is labor power.
Tax burden: as developing countries rely a lot on portfolio capitals and FDIs, the tax burden is low on capital, in order to attract foreign investors,
What are the 3 types of voting ?
- retrospective/prospective voting
- personal, sociotropic voting
- objective and subjective voting