Lecture 11: Comprehension and Written Language Flashcards
What does visual processing involve?
- Involves Eye movements (Gaze)
- Series of pauses (fixations) and jumps (saccades)
- -fixations ~ 200 - 250 ms (80% of content words)
- saccades ~ 20 - 40 ms (7 – 9 letter jumps)
Why do we engage in series of fixations and Saccades during reading?
We cant see anything when our eyes are moving, cannot process visual information just with saccades (saccadic suppression). Visual acuity best at foveated area (we have to fixate in order to process letters and words)
What does saccadic suppression mean?
no information processed during saccades
What are the two assumptions of visual processing?
- Immediacy: reader attempts to interpret/process fully, each (content) word as they are fixated on it (amount of time a person is fixated on a word reflects the amount of time it takes to process it, they don’t save it for later or process earlier information instead, it is immediate. Differences in fixation time depending on difficulty of word)
- Eye-Mind: eye will remain fixated on a word as long as the word is being processed
What 4 pieces of evidence are there for the necessity of engaging in a series of fixations and saccades?
1) Gaze-contingent paradigm (Rayner, 1998)
- What happens if we cover the foveated letters such that only the parafoveal can be seen?
- reading rate drops from 300 wpm to 50 wpm
- shows that fixating words is critical
2) Skipping Words (Carpenter & Just, 1983)
- when skip a word, it is usually a function word (the, and, but)
- skip more often with easy text
3) During Normal Reading
- If change next word during saccade?
- people do not notice
- shows, that very little of next word is preprocessed
4) Fixations & Reading Skill
- fixation patterns of high skill vs. low skill readers differ
- low skill - more fixations
- backtracking
- longer fixations per word
What is visual word recognition?
Encoding of words and activation of their corresponding orthographic, phonologic, and semantic representations
What 3 types of tasks are used to examine word recognition?
- eye tracking
- Lexical decision (deciding if it’s a word or not)
- naming (how long does it take someone to name a word?)
How do we build models for word recognition?
- center model around robust “marker” effects (variables or factors that have a strong reliable effect on what it is you are trying to look at)
- then start to build around these effects
What are the marker effects in word recognition?
- word frequency
- common vs. less common words
- word frequency affects:
- fixation time during reading
- lexical decision time (LDT)
- naming time
What is the structure of morton’s logogen model?
- Encoding –> Logogen System –> Output
What is a logogen?
- 1 logogen per known word (Logo = word, Gen= genesis as in origin)
- includes orthographic (spelling) & phonological (sound) attributes of each word
- “information” accumulator
- each logogen has a resting activation level
- each logogen has an activation threshold (once you exceed that activation threshold, it fires and because of that we now know that H O U S E is house (i.e., the threshold for common words is low, we don’t need a lot of activation to recognize that word. Takes more time to reach threshold for uncommon words. Exposure changes thresholds)
How does a logogen explain the frequency effect?
- assume threshold is lower for common words
What are context/priming effects and how did they modify Morton’s model?
- Doctor- nurse vs. tree-nurse
- Morgan’s original model did not deal with semantic priming/account for meaning so he modified his model to include context/semantics
- When you see a word like doctor, the context system accounts for similar words, nurse is semantically closely related so nurse also starts to fire (pre activation)
What are repetition effects?
Visual/visual presentation:
- House-house (present a word twice in a short amount of time)
- Recognition faster 2nd time (because of repetition priming)
- Evidenced by a higher resting activation level
Auditory/visual presentation
- Spoken ‘house’ vs. visual ‘house’
- Logogen should account for this priming because he thought that logogens were visual and auditory. However, he did not find repetition effects for visual to auditory priming.
- Thus, He changed his model again to account for this (broke it into two separate parts: phonological lexicon and orthographic lexicon)
How did repetition effects influence Morton’s Model?
- Encoding –> - Split the logogen system into two parts: orthographic and phonological
Orthographic lexicon/ Phonological lexicon –> - Output
- Context system still there