Lecture 11: co-operative breeding Flashcards
‘helpers’ assist
breeder to raise offspring that are (usually) not their own
Diversity of cooperative systems:
quite diverse
- 4-9% of bird species
- 3% of mammal species
- described in >10 fish spp.
- ‘primitive’ social insects
‘Helpers at the nest’ (80%) florida scrub jay
- pair + 1.8 helpers
- helpers feed & protect young form predators
- helpers usually related to breeding pair
‘Helpers at the nest’ (80%) silver-backed jackal
- pair + 1-3 helpers
- helpers regurgitate food to pups and lactating female
‘Helpers at the nest’ (80%) naked mole-rat
- c.f. eusocial insects
- reproductive division of labour (caste system)
plural breeders =
several males and females share a nest and raise a communal brood
plural breeder examples
- banded mongoose
- 4 - 40 in a group
- several females reproduce
- acorn woodpecker
- 2 -14 in a group
plural breeder typical group
1-4 breeding males
1-4 breeding females
up to 8 non breeding helpers
evolution of cooperative breeding: hypothesis
Ecological constraints hypothesis Emlen 1982
Ecological constraints hypothesis: ellen 1982
indépendant breeding is constrained –habitat saturation/ecological constraints–> grown offspring delay dispersal and “stay at home” –Fitness benefits of helping exceed those of not helping –> Grown offspring help to rear later broods
ecological constraints hypothesis assumption:
there is a better fitness return from breeding than helping (but breeding is constrained)
cooperative breeding: hypothesis; constraints cause offspring to delay dispersal instead of breeding independently CORRELATION EVIDENCE
e. g. acorn woodpecker. Correlation evidence
- ‘bad’ years –> more helping
cooperative breeding: hypothesis; constraints cause offspring to delay dispersal instead of breeding independently EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE
e. g. superb fairy-wren
- - 60% of pairs have male helpers
- - sex ratio is 1.8 M : 1F
Manipulate constraints on breeding –> effect on incidence of cooperation
exp1: male removed from pair, vacancy for helper 31/33 spots filled in 5 hours
exp2: M & F removed. 7 empty territories–> 0/7 occupied by helpers. Female released after 3 days –> all territories filled
Conclusions:
- helpers are capable of reproduction
- habitat is limiting (ecological constraints hyp)
- mates are limiting
are helpers constrained from breeding?
experiments reveal different constraints:
e.g. food, nest cavities, territory and mates
inclusive fitness:
direct & indirect fitness benefits
direct fitness =
fitness gained from personal reproduction
indirect fitness =
fitness gained for increasing production of non-descendant kin (via kin selection )
direct fitness benefits:
- increased probability of future breeding
- increased survival
- direct reproduction
increased survival benefits of group living: Group augmentation hypothesis:
hypothesis: help = payment for being allowed to stay
- producing extra offspring benefits helpers by increasing group size
increased survival benefits of group living: Group augmentation hypothesis: circumstantial evidence:
circumstantial evidence: Kidnapping in banded mongoose and white-winged chough
increased survival benefits of group living: Group augmentation hypothesis: Experimental evidence:
cichlids groups more likely to accept immigrants when predation risk high
increased probability of future breeding: territory inheritance
florida scrub jay
-48% of helpers eventually acquire all or part of parental territory
increased probability of future breeding: mate acquisition
pied kingfisher: the distant kin helpers 41% inherit female when breeding male dies
increased probability of future breeding: increased experience (skills hypothesis)
seychelles warbles
– performed better if they’d been helper before
Direct reproduction:
seychelles warbler: helpers are usually female
- 44% lay eggs in helped nest
- 15% of all young produced by helpers
indirect fitness benefits:
- increased reproductive success of relatives
- increased survival of related breeders
indirect fitness benefits: increased reproductive success of relatives
long tailed tit & white-fronted bee-eater
– reproductive success increases with number of helpers
indirect fitness benefits: Increased survival of related breeders
= ‘load lightening’
helpers gain __ & __ fitness benefits from helping
direct and indirect