Lecture 11: co-operative breeding Flashcards

1
Q

‘helpers’ assist

A

breeder to raise offspring that are (usually) not their own

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Diversity of cooperative systems:

A

quite diverse

  • 4-9% of bird species
  • 3% of mammal species
  • described in >10 fish spp.
  • ‘primitive’ social insects
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

‘Helpers at the nest’ (80%) florida scrub jay

A
  • pair + 1.8 helpers
  • helpers feed & protect young form predators
  • helpers usually related to breeding pair
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

‘Helpers at the nest’ (80%) silver-backed jackal

A
  • pair + 1-3 helpers

- helpers regurgitate food to pups and lactating female

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

‘Helpers at the nest’ (80%) naked mole-rat

A
  • c.f. eusocial insects

- reproductive division of labour (caste system)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

plural breeders =

A

several males and females share a nest and raise a communal brood

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

plural breeder examples

A
  • banded mongoose
    • 4 - 40 in a group
    • several females reproduce
  • acorn woodpecker
    • 2 -14 in a group
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

plural breeder typical group

A

1-4 breeding males
1-4 breeding females
up to 8 non breeding helpers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

evolution of cooperative breeding: hypothesis

A

Ecological constraints hypothesis Emlen 1982

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Ecological constraints hypothesis: ellen 1982

A

indépendant breeding is constrained –habitat saturation/ecological constraints–> grown offspring delay dispersal and “stay at home” –Fitness benefits of helping exceed those of not helping –> Grown offspring help to rear later broods

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

ecological constraints hypothesis assumption:

A

there is a better fitness return from breeding than helping (but breeding is constrained)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

cooperative breeding: hypothesis; constraints cause offspring to delay dispersal instead of breeding independently CORRELATION EVIDENCE

A

e. g. acorn woodpecker. Correlation evidence

- ‘bad’ years –> more helping

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

cooperative breeding: hypothesis; constraints cause offspring to delay dispersal instead of breeding independently EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE

A

e. g. superb fairy-wren
- - 60% of pairs have male helpers
- - sex ratio is 1.8 M : 1F

Manipulate constraints on breeding –> effect on incidence of cooperation

exp1: male removed from pair, vacancy for helper 31/33 spots filled in 5 hours
exp2: M & F removed. 7 empty territories–> 0/7 occupied by helpers. Female released after 3 days –> all territories filled

Conclusions:

  • helpers are capable of reproduction
  • habitat is limiting (ecological constraints hyp)
  • mates are limiting
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

are helpers constrained from breeding?

A

experiments reveal different constraints:

e.g. food, nest cavities, territory and mates

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

inclusive fitness:

A

direct & indirect fitness benefits

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

direct fitness =

A

fitness gained from personal reproduction

17
Q

indirect fitness =

A

fitness gained for increasing production of non-descendant kin (via kin selection )

18
Q

direct fitness benefits:

A
  • increased probability of future breeding
  • increased survival
  • direct reproduction
19
Q

increased survival benefits of group living: Group augmentation hypothesis:

A

hypothesis: help = payment for being allowed to stay

- producing extra offspring benefits helpers by increasing group size

20
Q

increased survival benefits of group living: Group augmentation hypothesis: circumstantial evidence:

A

circumstantial evidence: Kidnapping in banded mongoose and white-winged chough

21
Q

increased survival benefits of group living: Group augmentation hypothesis: Experimental evidence:

A

cichlids groups more likely to accept immigrants when predation risk high

22
Q

increased probability of future breeding: territory inheritance

A

florida scrub jay

-48% of helpers eventually acquire all or part of parental territory

23
Q

increased probability of future breeding: mate acquisition

A

pied kingfisher: the distant kin helpers 41% inherit female when breeding male dies

24
Q

increased probability of future breeding: increased experience (skills hypothesis)

A

seychelles warbles

– performed better if they’d been helper before

25
Q

Direct reproduction:

A

seychelles warbler: helpers are usually female

  • 44% lay eggs in helped nest
  • 15% of all young produced by helpers
26
Q

indirect fitness benefits:

A
  • increased reproductive success of relatives

- increased survival of related breeders

27
Q

indirect fitness benefits: increased reproductive success of relatives

A

long tailed tit & white-fronted bee-eater

– reproductive success increases with number of helpers

28
Q

indirect fitness benefits: Increased survival of related breeders

A

= ‘load lightening’

29
Q

helpers gain __ & __ fitness benefits from helping

A

direct and indirect