Lecture 10 - Mechanical Philosophy & The Royal Society Flashcards

1
Q

Mechanical Philosophy?

A

Everything is matter in motion

  • > just things colliding
  • > give me initial conditions, and I’ll know everything
No occult forces (action @ distance)
  ->wtf is Astrology? Loses credibility
  ->You can't patch up the knife to heal a wound
No Aristotelean tendencies
  ->no final cause, inherent properties

Atoms and “Corpuscles”

  • > corpuscles are non-uniform, weird shapes
    • > hooks, scews…
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Roots of Mech Phil

A

Bunch of goons until Pierre Gassendi, Descartes.

1) Democritus with the atom.

2) Epicurius: World is eternal, meaningless collisions
- >doesn’t matter what you do
- >might as well enjoy!

3) Lucretius:
- >the famous one who spread other’s ideas

No guiding force, all random. Eternal, always will/have collided.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Pierre Gassendi

A

First to make M.P. palatable to Christians
->could not have become widespread without him

1) God started it, not eternal
2) God guides the collisions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Rene Descartes

A

Everything is matter in motion

Used different shaped particles

  • > magnetism is tiny screws, filling tiny holes
  • > repulsion when you put wrong screws, wrong holes

Anti-Aristotelean M.P., wanted to replace Arist

  • > main difference, no final cause
  • > matter inert
  • > ONLY EFFICIENT CAUSES
    • > and the cause is always “matter bumped into matter”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Mathematization of Nature?

A

Arist separated Math and N.P.
->but now people do both (+ recall Archimedes)

Galileo: 2 New Sciences
->describes velocity, geometric gravity -> parabola

Boyle: Particles in Gas

  • > mechanical explanation, + math for laws of nature
  • > less Volume means more collisions means Pressure
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Sides of the Vacuum Debate? Example arguments and supporters of each?

A

World full of particles (PLENISM) or empty space between? (VACUISM)

Descartes: Plenist

  • > you can change matter all you want, you can’t remove its 3D property
  • > space is inherent to matter
  • > space can’t exist without matter
  • > vacuums impossible
  • > world explained with vortices
    • > when something moves, another rushes to fill in
    • > planets just sit in vortices, no circular requirement

Torricelli: Vacuuism

  • > turn mercury upside down in bowl of mercury
  • > bubble at top, air couldn’t have gotten through
  • > so proof of vacuum!

Boyle & Hooke: Vacuuism
->creates a vacuum, close enough to extinguish fire and kill animals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Experimental Philosophy

A

Galileo had many thought experiments
->unclear how many are theoretical vs actually done

Example from 2 New Sciences:
1 ->drop 2 balls of same material, 10 and 1 pounds
->aristotle says bigger = faster
->so if I tie them together, does it fall as 11, 10, or 1?
2 ->earth can move around sun without us flying off
->it’s just like dropping a ball on a moving boat
->we see it fall straight, shore sees it move in X

He does do important experiments too though

  • > rolls balls down planes; distance is time squared
  • > puts together with idea X, Y indy
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Francis Bacon

A

FATHER OF EMPRICISM, EXPERIMENTAL PHILOSOPHY
->empiricism: everything comes from empirical proof
->need to sense everything
Published 1000 experiments
-But bacon’s “Experiment” ~= “Experience”
->”I know a guy who didn’t eat for days, and survived by smelling food” is an experiment
->do fear and shame spread?

THE NEW ATLANTIS:

  • > utopia with the most amazing experiments
  • > live forever, modify/transform animals….
  • > lists things possible with experiments
    • > alter features, prolong life, medicine…
  • > just dedicate yourself to experiments, and it’ll all come true!
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

The Royal Society

A

Many experimentalist groups in London ~1640

  • > discuss world’s experiments
  • > met at pubs, apartments…
  • > just talk science, no politics

1640-1650 turmoil, executes own king
->no leader for decade
1660 Restoration of Monarchy
->how to set up gov’t? theology?

John Wallis

  • > asked society to put away theology, just science
  • > reach consensus with witnesses
  • > show how it’s done

Exclude dangerous people

A branch of the Restoration Government
->was not without influences, where Science was free from Uni and Gov’t

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Hobbes

A

His work, LEVIATHAN

  • > Church should be one with Gov’t
  • > materialistic N.P
    • > only things with matter exist; no God, no Soul
    • > dangerous ideas if you want unity

Perpetually rejected from RS, but pointed problems with Hooke & Boyle’s Air Pump

  • > it leaks, can’t get all air out
  • > almost nobody can replicate it, but one who almost did gets different results
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

R.S. Experiments?

A

1) Blood transfusion
- >give a crazy man “lamb’s blood” infusion

2) Hooke’s Instruments
- >ships depth
- >water samples from bottom of ocean
- >air pump (+Boyle)

Hooke gives idea of witnessed, replicable experiments
->detailed accounts, like today’s lab report
Proof for others to see and verify, need Witnesses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Micrographia

A

Hooke’s paper, first RS puts their stamp on

  • > reveals new micro world
    • > like Galileo’s telescopes with space
  • > breakthrough in science and RS reputation
  • > mould, fly eyes, snowflakes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly