LECTURE 1: Introduction and Historic, Conceptual and Performance Overview Flashcards
What is the 5 stage model of M&A?
- Corporate Strategy Development
- Organising for the Acquisition
- Deal Structuring and Negotiation
- Post Acquisition Integration
- Post Acquisition Audit and Organisational Learning.
Describe Stage 1: Corporate Strategy Development
Define overall strategy - the foundation for an effective M&A strategy is the overall strategy that addresses:
markets, products/services, human capital, financial goals, risk tolerance, timeliness.
Need to understand risk tolerance of target and buyer.
Determine whether M&A is even a viable option to achieve business objectives.
Decide target criteria:
size, revenue/revenue growth, earnings/earnings growth, management ream profiles, complete vs partial acquisitions, geographic location, financing constraints
- Set Targets
- Business strategies:
- competitive advantage in product markets
- sustainable business strategy model (inappropriate model -> merger likely to fail) - Corporate objectives:
- Optimise portfolio of businesses to serve shareholders’ interests.
- Firm make acquisitions - gain market power, gain economies of scale and scope, save cost of dealing with markets.
Describe Stage 2: Organising for the acquisition
- Precondition for success: organise yourself for effective acquisition-making.
- Success: clear and thorough definitions of target that have been decided in order to create value
- Lack of organisational resources can lead to failure
- Managerial biases can also lead to failure
- Managerial biases can also lead to failure (objectives are not always rational) - overvalue synergies/target firm, underestimate risk.
Describe Stage 3: Deal Structuring and Negotiation
- Value target firm
- Selection of advisors
- Decide on payment method(s)
- Obtain and evaluate intelligence (understanding) for target firm (either from target or other resources)
- Perform due diligence (investigation, examination)
- Negotiate the post-acquisition managerial roles
- Develop appropriate bid and defence strategies
Describe Stage 4: Post-Acquisition Integration
Put in place the deal/ merged organisation in order to deliver the initial goals and value expectations.
- Change of: target firm, acquiring firm, attitude and behaviour of both firms.
- It has to be viewed as a project (goals, deadlines, performance benchmarks, etc)
- Integration time: time of great uncertainty
- Organisational/national culture compatibility.
Describe stage 5: Post-Acquisition Audit and Organisational Learning
This stage might not be considered as important and may be neglected (wrongly).
- Lack of organisational emphasis on learning.
- Each deal is considered unique, past experience may seem irrelevant.
- Individual’s experience is not easy to be communicated.
MERGER WAVES
Mergers tend to cluster during different periods in time.
Industry clustering.
Describe historical merger waves in the UK
First wave: 1880-1905 (1899)
- Oligopolies merger to form monopolies
- Few merged firms control the majority of the market
Second wave: 1920s
- Followed 1903-4 crash and World War I
- Regulation against monopolies was enforced
- Oligopoly industry structures
Third Wave: 1960s
- Wave after World War II
- Goal: achieve growth through diversification
Fourth Wave: 1980s
- Bust-up takeovers (diversified underperforming firm and then sell off various parts of it)
- LBOs (leveraged Buy-Outs, MBOs (Management Buy-Outs)
Fifth Wave: 1990s
- Mother or all waves (peaking in 1998-99)
- Emergence of new technologies (e.g. Internet, cable TV, satellite communication, etc)
Why do mergers cluster in time?
- Rational Economic Models (Neoclassical Theory)
- Managers are rational
- Markets are rational (firms are fairly priced)
- Maximise long-term value - Behavioural Models
- Markets are not rational (overvaluation)
- Managers take advantage of their overvaluation to proceed to takeover activity
What is the Q Theory (rational explanation for merger clusters)
Michael Gort (1969)
- Merger waves occur when there is a rise in economic activity and disequilibrium in product market is created
- Some investors are more optimistic about future demand -> view targets at higher values
- Leading firms take action and proceed to takeovers
- Competitors follow (“me to” approach)
- Momentum for mergers is created
- Gort’s model can explain merger waves and periods of high economic growth and period of bullmarkets
Q Ratio
High Q firms: overvalued, better managed firms, more efficient use of assets.
- Assets are acquired by better-managed firms leading higher value creation
- High Q buys low Q
- While valuation dispersion and the Q-theory can explain why merger take place, it doesn’t explain why valuation differences cluster in time.
Describe environmental causes of historical waves
PEST model (Political, Economic, Social and Technical changes)
- Transportation/mass production in 1980s
- Information Technology in 1990s
- Increase of Europeans spending on leisure: merge of travel firms in 1990s
- Privatisation of UL utility firms attracted many US bidders in the 1980s
- Political and regulatory changes in 1920s (laws against monopolistic approaches)
What is the effect on industry of M&As?
Different industries may be affected differently by economic/environmental changes.
- Different entry barriers
- Open new markets for products
- Changes in technology -> changes in the cost of unit production
- New regulations/deregulation
Shleifer and Vishny (2003) model
- In high stock market valuation, managers take advantage of their overvalued equity to acquire “cheap” target firm.
- They offer “overvalued” stock as a method of payment to acquire the real assets of a target firm.
- Bidder’s stock should be more overvalued than target’s stock -> High buys low (Q theory)
What are the implications of Shliefer and Vishny’s (2003) model?
- Managers exploit their overvaluation only by offering stock as a method of payment.
- Target managers will sell their stock to acquirers for their own benefit.
- Targets are undervalued/ or less overvalued that the acquirer
- Long-run return for stock acquisitions are higher than non-acquirers.