Lecture 1 - History & Background Flashcards

1
Q

Ancient Views and Treatment

A
  • Historians examined bones, artwork and other remains.
  • believed mh difficulties due to possession
  • holes in skull thought to be evidence of trephination - removing spirits through drilling
  • exorcism key treatment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Greek & Roman views

A
  • Hippocrates: illnesses had natural causes of physical problems. also emphasised importance of heredity/predispositions.
  • e.g. injury to head = motor disorder
  • classified mh into 3 categories: mania, melancholia & phrenitis
  • illness = humor imbalance (mania excess yellow bile, melancholia excess black bile)
  • Galen used treatments such as bloodletting & acknowledged role of psychological stressors in health.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

The rise of asylums

A
  • appeared in late 1400s
  • designed to be humane but overcrowded and underfunded = unsanitary & physical punishments.
  • asylums set people back
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

William Tuke & Harriet Martineau

A
  • spearheaded asylum reform in UK
  • led to development of the Lunacy Inquiry Act (1842) meaning asylums were to be inspected every 4 months
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Europe in the middle ages: rise of demonology

A
  • as rome declined power of clergy inc: supernatural understandings of mh
  • medieval times had church revived theories of possession
  • only from renaissance did demonological views decrease due to scientific & cultural knowledge
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Philippe Pinel & Asylum Reform (1700s)

A
  • chief physician - it was a morally right thing to provide treatment, food and support.
  • move individuals to better rooms and access to fresh air.
  • studied & classified mh symptoms using rm and observations of symptoms over time
  • argued poor mh due to social, psychological & physiological factors together.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

somatogenic perspective of medication

A
  • physical approaches to mh treatment relatively unsucccessful and accidentally discovered medications to improve QOL: e.g. chlorpromazine (antipsychotic) and tricylic antidepressants
  • drug companies invest in marketing that mh conditons are common, treatable and physical
  • marketing on thorazine centred on benefits but turned people into zombies
  • led to rise of drugs
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Freud (psychogenic perspective)

A
  • proposed mh conditions originate from the unconscious mind and early life exp.
  • collision with somatogenic perspective: theories untestable
  • treatments were for privileged people and out patients. first outpaint appointment was office-based psychoanalysis
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

diagnostic categories

A
  • we want targeted categories to diagnose
  • want to know what symptoms categorise as, treatments to assist & prognosis
  • valid, discrete entities demarcated by firm boudaries between one another and normality
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

deinstitutionalisation (1870 - 1960)

A
  • inc numbers admitted to asylums made humane practices harder to sustain in 1800s.
  • newly developed sedatives used more & physical therapies e.g. shocks
  • mh hospitals grew until mid 1950s. now there is a lack of beds and funding so inpatient treatment may be further away = cuts off social relationships
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Kraeplin (somatogenic perspective)

A
  • father of modern psychiatry. developed documenting symptoms and led to classification.
  • psychiatry = medical science informed by observation and empirical practices
  • opposed inhumane practices and psychodynamic/philosophical approaches
  • promoted neuropathological approach (co-discoverer of alzheimers)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

mh condition definition

A
  • DSM5: ‘syndrome characterised by clinically signif disturbance in cognition, emotion regulation ot behaviour that reflects a dysfunction in the psychological, biological or developmental processes underlying functioning.
  • md usually associated with distress or disability in important activities. not something that is a response to an expectable common stressor
  • socially deviant behaviour only disorder if conflict results from a dysfunction in the individual.
  • patterns of abnormal behaviour associated with: psych dysfuntion, emotional distress, impaired functioning
  • may depend on culture?
  • 25% UK experience mh problem each year (underestimates) especially: women, young
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Rosenhan

A
  • 3m 5f (inc himself) reported auditory hallucinations & admitted to 12 psychiatric hospitals
  • all diagnosed
  • diagnosed with schizophrenia ‘in remission’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Rosenhan criticisms

A
  • criticised by Spitzer
  • identities of pseudopatients unclear & inconsistent reports (Cahalan 2019)
  • Rosenhan’s own records who he described more severe symptoms
  • pp’s dropped if they did not fit the narrative
  • ‘sz in remission’ was as close to cure as possible and not the same as a diagnosed mental illness
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Spitzer: Father of DSM

A
  • US Psychiatrist led to development of DSMIII
  • DSMI and II were niche, III was ambitious and widely used.
  • generally shifted from Kraeplins emphasis on neuropathological cause. DSM III did not discuss cause much
  • empahasised importance of empirical findings than philosophical thoughts in defining conditions
  • use of reliable signs and symptoms of conditions
  • removed homosexuality as mh condition
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

DSMIII II-TR & IV-TR

A
  • removed freudian term ‘meurosis’ revised om DSMIII-TR
  • DSM IV (1994) led by Allen Frances established a core definition of a mental health condition emphasising functional impairment & clinically significant distress
  • used field trials to test reliability of diagnoses
  • included some dimensional phenomena but mostly categorical
  • long gap before DSM5 which defined a mh condition in broader terms.
10
Q

Classifying MH difficulties

A
  • DSM5 classifies conditions not people who have them.
  • categorical system now with some dimensional severity ratings (541 diagnoses)
  • included many new diagnoses at the threshold of normality with potential to reclassify many as mentally disordered - risk of over diagnosis?
11
Q

Problems with DSM

A
  • over reliance on medical model assumes can treat in same way
  • no clear line between having a disorder vs not and vs a different disorder
  • Kraeplin: each category of condition should have a specific biological pathology that accounts for it and specific therapy to treat it - not the case in DSM5.
  • pathologising normal experiences?
  • how valid and reliable?
  • symptoms are generally dimensional but not always normally distributed
12
Q

Current approach to mental health conditions

A
  • current approach links social psychological and biological factors. some social factors deterministic so we have indiv difs in profiles of risk and resilience of factors
  • factors e.g. spiritual, epigenetic changes, broader environ influence perceptions of mh.
13
Q

key terms

A
  • incidence - no. of new cases of a condition/symptom in specified pop specified time
  • cure/remission - the rate at which the condition/symptom ceases to be present
  • recurrence - rate at which a condition/symptom occurs again in people who previously had it
  • prevalence - % or no. cases per 100,000 etc. can be point prevalence (at specific point in time) period (e.g. past 12 months) or lifetime.
  • aetiology - process a disorder develops
  • course - progression of a disorder over time
  • comorbidity - concurrent condition alongside another
  • odds ratio - probability of an event happening compared to alternative. 1 = equal odds.