Lecture 1 _ Freedom Of Expression & The Media Flashcards
What is the bill of rights 1689
That the freedom of speech and debates or proceedings in parliament ought not to be impeached or questioned in any court or place out of parliament ~ article IX
What is ‘licensing the press’ act 1662
Sweeping powers of search and seizure of unlicensed presses, printing and manuscripts
- expiration 1695
Why is freedom of expression important?
- a pillar of democratic society- freedom to impart & receive information
- equal opportunities to contribute to public debate & discourse
- holding power to account & highlighting misfeasance
- transparency indecision - making & institutions
- open justice & confidence in the court system
- however, freedom of expression often conflicts with other rights
- trump rights’
*- European system-balancing of rights
- trump rights’
When should freedom expression yield?
- Harmful speech- hate speech, obscenity, incitement to crime /disorder, glorification of terrorism
- protection of personal reputation
- protection of individual privacy
- pubic interest may, on occasion, require that something is NOT published:
*In the interests of national security - the administration of justice - need for judicial impartiality protection of witnesses etc
- protection of vulnerable people
- intellectual property reasons:
- commercial information a trade secrets
- protecting creative interests
- copy right
What is article 19 of the universal declaration of human rights 1948?
Article 19: everyone has the right to freedom of opinion a expression: this right includes freedom to had opinions without interference a to seek, receive & impart information & ideas through any
Media regardless of frontiers
- first international recognition of universal entitlement human rights
- NB: UDHR is not legally binding & has no enforcement mechanisms
- it is highly influential on development of more binding instruments
What is the European convention on human rights 1950?
- The ECHR & fundamental freedoms
- to legally enforce UNDHR principles in Europe
- purpose: a her second world war - to prevent the vote of fascisim /dictatorship again in Europe
- rights are either absolute (article 3- freedom from torture), limited or qualified
- first instrument to have distinct enforcement machinery & independent court of oversight ( European court of human rights)
- enforceable against public bodies in the uk through the human rights act 1998.
Human rights act 1998 section 6
Section 6 of the human rights act section 6- acts of public authorities
- (1) it is unlawful for a pubic authority to act in a way which is incompatible with a convention right
- (3) in this section “ public authority” includes:
- (a) a court or tribunal, and
- (b) any person certain of whose functions are functions of a public nature
What is the impact of the human rights act 1998
- Individuals can take action against public bodies for breach of their ECHR rights -in uk counts ( NB - status of media outlets)
- courts must apply ECHR in their decisions
- article 6: right to a fair trial - a limited right
- article 8: private & family life - a qualified right
- article 10: freedom of expression - a qualified right
What are the implications of media law
- No interference with the right to respect for private & family life
- Qualified by being balanced with other rights & interests, including article 10 right to freedom of expression
- Qualified right are judged by the ecthr on principles of a “ margin of appreciation”& “proportionality”
- Reflects the principle of open justice
*Limited because: - protecting the right of a defendant to a fair trial involves some restrictions on what can be reported
- protection of vulnerable parties & witnesses
- smooth administration of justice
- right to freedom & exchange of information is qualified in article 10 (2) by other rights & interests
- includes the right for the protection of reputation & fair trial
- there may be competing claims for privacy under article 8
- freedom of speech may accordingly have to yield to other interests in particular circumstances
- different to first amendment rights: public debate must be “uninhabited, robust & wide open “: New York Times v. Sullivan 376 US 254 (1964)
Proportionality of media law
- Is interference with article 10 justified:
- is it effective in meeting the states legitimate aim?
- is it as least intrusive as possible?
- does it deprive the very essence of the right?
-Is it fairly balanced between the interests of the individual & the interests of the community as a whole? - concerns during development of HRA that privacy would roll back artice 10 rights