Lecture 1 Flashcards
What are the characteristics of natural sciences?
- “Example science” = easy to show how it works
- Most ancient; astronomy since 1200 BCE
- Developed after scientific revolution (1550-1700)
- Universals and regularities; classes of outcomes and not individual outcomes
- Standard techniques of theorising: mathematisation, abstraction, idaelisation
- Can produce formats: laws of nature
- Laws as paradigms of knowledge; highest grade of scientific knowledge
What are characteristics of Humanities?
- Ways of doing (rather than ways of knowing) - grammar, rhetoric, logic
- Focus on historical human actors
- Historical particularity: every context is unique
- Mistrust generalisation and idealisation
- Main output = interpretation (of acts, texts and artworks), embedded in theoretical frameworks
- Objectivity of interpretation (testing against other texts or material)
What are characteristics of Social Sciences?
- Youngest group of disciplines
- Originated in 19th century in French and German debates on how to study societies
- Examples: sociology, political science, economics, psychology, etc.
- World of social sciences contains human agents and institutions, forms of behaviour, rationality and ritual, cultures
- Attraction to both natural sciences and humanities
- Diversity within disciplines: both quantitative and qualitative approaches
How can we conceptualise the difference between natural sciences and humanities?
Through the concept of using nomothetic and idiographic approaches
What are characteristics of the nomothetic approach?
- Identifying regularities in the world
- Explain outcomes as following from rules and patterns
- formulating generalisations and laws to describe regularities
- deriving explanations of observed outcomes from these generalisations
- typical of natural sciences
- Looking at the world and defying regularities in it; then formulate roles of nature to try and explain the regularity
What are strengths of the nomothetic approach?
- Identify similarities and structures that underlie apparently diverse cases
- Yield sweeping, general knowledge
- Yield economical knowledge
What are weaknesses of the nomothetic approach?
- Not good at identifying the specificity of outcomes
- Can be reductive, mechanistic, positivistic
What are characteristics of the idiographic approach?
- Specify
- Understanding the meaning of contingent, unique and often subjective outcomes
- Typical of humanities
What are the strengths of the idiographic approach?
- Reveal differences between apparently similar cases
- Can yield detailed, context-sensitive knowledge
What are the weaknesses of the idiographic approach?
Can be blind to general factors that constrain outcomes