Lecture 1 Flashcards
Discuss biological vs cognitive vs cognivitist psychology
Biological = the structure and chemistry of body functioning. Cognitive = the content. Cognitivist = an approach to studying behaviour
Discuss the nature of cognitive psychology
It is mostly abstract - defined without reference to the physical world. Thus thoughts ideas and attitudes are about physical world they are not physical entities.
What is referred to as Dualism
The physical VS. mental distinction
Discuss Descartes interpretation of Dualism
The world is made up of two incompatible substances - the mental and the physical. How does the mental (feeling bored) lead to physical (writing a lecture) or how does the mental cause the physical if the two substances are incompatible.
Is psychology a science if it is concerned with the mental rather than the physical
Yes. We can use the scientific methods developed to study the physical world to study the mental world
What is behaviourism
Argues that a true science of psychology strives for laws of behaviour couched in terms of physical events and physical processes. These laws will contain statements only about things that are observable and can be measured. If we can find these laws then we should be able to predict and control. E.G. classical conditioning - see food and see salivating dog
Discuss behaviourist theories
Only contain statements about observable things - accordingly, unobservable things like the mind aren’t proper subjects for scientific study
What is wrong with the view that only observable things are scientific
Other sciences studies the unobservable and abstract and made testable predictions. E.G. Gregor Mendel published work on genetic inheritance before DNA was discovered
Can we scientifically study things we can’t directly see
As long as the validity of our predications are open to empirical testing - then we can test as many abstract things as we want
What is the issue with simplicity
There is a danger of deriving very complex accounts of even the simplest behaviours. Occams razor
What is Occam’s razor
Entities must not be multiplied unnecessarily - keep things as simple as possible. When you have two competing theories, which make exactly the same predictions - the one which is simpler is better
Discuss simplicity and the thermostat
It is easy to suggest that a thermostat has beliefs about room temperature, but do we need to invoke such beliefs in order to understand how a thermostat works? NO - we can fully account for the operation of the thermostat from understanding its internal components - Occam’s razor
Discuss simplicity and the mind
When is an account based on abstract mental entities appropriate? If we are reluctant to ascribe mental processes to devices then why do we want to ascribe them to humans? Even if we understood all possible patterns of neural firing in a brain, this would not be the same across all brains
Discuss cognitive psychologists and function
If we accept that mental events correspond with neurological events AND that different patterns of nerve cells can correspond with the same thought in different brains. We can start to think about what it is about these patterns of firing that gives rise to a particular thought - in other words we need to consider the FUNCTION
Discuss function and functional role
E.G. you can produce a flow chart on various parts of a car engine - but it doesn’t tell you what each part actually does! You don’t need to say anything about the physical location of the components - only their sequence and what they are required to do