Lecture 1 Flashcards
Economics
study of people’s choices given the constrains they face (time, money, info)
poblic policy
uk gov policy on tax, spending and regulation
When should the government intervene in the economy?
if it can increase social efficency or achive more preferred distribution of resources
social wealfare
-level of well being in the society
-everything we value, but we also care who gets what= different redistribution and social protection
-can be done by improving market efficiency
How might the government intervene?
-tax or subsidies private purchases which increase or decrease demand
-restrict or mandate private sale or purchase
-public provisison- the gov provides the good directly to attain the level of consumption that maximises social welfare
-public financing of private
provsion-gov finances private entities to provide the desired level of provision, influencing the level of consumption
What are the effects of those interventions on economic outcomes?
try to increase social wealfare, improve market conditions, address market failures
Social efficiency
-net gains to society from all activity in a market/ market is at its optimal level therefore the gov can’t make it better
-if it is not at its OPTIMAL LEVEL= THINK WHAT THE GOV COULD DO TO IMPROVE
-social efficency is maximised at the competitive equilibrium (under the assumption that markets work)
-total social surplus= sum of the consumer and producer surplus
first fundamental theorem of welfare economics
-competative equilibrium (S=D) which MAXIMIzES SOCIAL EFFICEICNCY
-social efficiency relies on the market achieving this level, if the markets fail and can’t achive the social efficieny the gov intervenes and it could be able to imporve it
examples of market failures
-imperfect competition
-imperfect or asymmetric information
-individual failures
-externalities
Gov maximising social welfare level
Determined by both how much gets produced (social efficiency) and how it is distributed
Second fundamental theorem of welfare economics
Society can attain any efficient outcome by suitably redistributing resources among individuals and then allowing them to freely trade
Second fundamental theorem of welfare economics- dissandvantage
can’t redistrubute without reducing socIal efficiency leding to a EQUITY-EFFICIENT TRADE-OFF
TRADE OF social efficiency with increased equity
The question then is
*what policies can redistribute with the lowest efficiency cost
*how much efficiency are we willing to give up to redistribute
the outcome of out of work benefits
Without benefits, the labor market is in competitive equilibrium X
*
Introduce generous out of work benefits: this increase equity by redistributing income, but labour supply falls, new equilibrium is Y, leads to deadweight loss
*
If benefits are reduced to a less genous level leading to equilbrium Z this reduces deadweight loss but also reduces redistribution
*
i.e. there is a trade-off between equity and efficiency
effects of intervention
direct- people dont change their beh as a responce
indirect/unintended effects- effects that arise only because individuals change their behavior in response to the interventions.
market failure
A problem that causes the market economy to deliver an outcome that does not maximize efficiency.