Lecture 02-Review Of Systems Flashcards
What are the steps of the diagnostic process?
- Identify the pt’s chief concern
- Identify barriers to communication
- Identify special concerns
- Create symptom timeline
- Create a diagnostic hypothesis list (remote + local pathology)
- Sort the list by epidemiology and specific case characteristics
- Ask specific Q’s to rule out specific conditions or pathological categories less likely
- Re-sort the list based on pt’s response to Q’s from step 7
- Perform tests to differentiate among the remaining diagnostic hypotheses
- Re-sort the diagnostic hypothesis list based on the pt’s response to specific tests
- Decide on a diagnostic impression
- Determine the appropriate pt disposition
The following describes which part of the subjective examination/diagnostic process?
- series of checklists or questions of common symptoms relevant to major body symptoms
- not intended to identify or rule out specific diseases
- part of the subjective screening process (medical model for pre-examination screening)
The Review of Systems
What is the purpose fo the review of systems?
- identify symptoms that may have been overlooked
- identify symptoms related to a principle complaint
- identify existing co-morbid conditions
- identify occult disease
- identify adverse drug reactions (ADR)
When should a PT complete a review of systems?
- Pt’s medical history or health risk reveals several red flags
- unable to determine that the source of the symptoms is mechanical
- pt doesn’t respond appropriately to the developed POC
- something changes during the course of the treatment making it appropriate
What is screened during a review of systems?
- general health
- cardiovascular system
- pulmonary system
- gastrointestinal system
- genitourinary system
- nervous system
- integumentary
- endocrine system
- MSK
True or False: the general health screen should be completed the screen that is most often completed in clinical practice.
TRUE
When does fatigue become a red flag?
When
- it interferes with the pt’s ability to carry out typical daily activities at home, work, social settings, school, or rehabilitation
- it lasts for 2-4 wks or more
What is malaise and when does it become concerning?
Malaise = sense of uneasiness or general discomfort or an “out of sorts” feeling
- you should ask the pt if the feeling of malaise occurred at/around the same time that the pain began OR does the pt feel it after aggravating movement/factors
- malaise becomes concerning when there is no clear connection between it no the presenting problem
When does a fever become a red flag?
- 99.5 F (37.5 C) > 2 wks without seeing MD
- 102 F (39 C)
When is weight loss/gain concerning?
- if the pt has experienced unexplained weight loss/gain (5-10% of body weight) over the last 6 months
- note; weight gain is associated with fluid retention (seen with CHF)
When does nausea and vomiting become a red flag?
- if the physician is not aware
- if symptoms have worsened since the pt’s last visit
- if there is an unexplained cause
- note; consider going back 6 months in the pt’s history to discuss incidences of nausea and/or vomiting
- also note; headaches originating from the neurovascular system often involve nausea and vomiting while those originating from the MSK system typically do not
What can you ask a pt about concerning medications and experiencing dizziness/lightheadedness?
If the symptoms began within 4-6 wks of taking the medication(s).
Is a pt more likely to experience tunnel vision with lightheadedness or fatigue?
Fatigue
When does paresthesia and/or numbness become a red flag?
If the pt is experiencing
- “Stocking-and-Glove” distribution
- “Saddle” distribution
- progressive deficits such as urinary problems (retention, incontinence) and bilateral extremity deficits or UE/LE combination
If a pt presents with changes in mentation, their examination should include assessment of:
- level of consciousness (alertness)
- attention (ability to focus)
- memory (short-term vs long-term)
- orientation (person, place, time)
- thought process (logical and coherent)
- judgement (evaluate alternatives and follow appropriate values while choosing a course)