Leaseholds Flashcards
(130 cards)
what is a leasehold?
a leasehold is a type of ownership carved out of a freehold estate for a fixed duration
the FH and LH exist concurrently in the same parcel of land
what power does the leaseholder have over the lease?
they can sub-lease the lease, but only for a shorter duration than their original lease
why would might a lease be created?
o Obtain income
o Retain an interest that can be sold
o Enforce positive covenants against a successor in title to the original tenant
can a lease be a legal?
yes, s1(1)(b) LPA 1925 establishes that a term of years absolute, which is essentially a leasehold estate, is one of the two legal estates in land recognized in English law
term of use absolute means it must be for a certain duration of time, it cannot be forever (whereas a freehold is forever)
The lease must meet certain formalities depending on the length of the lease
when the FH owner grants a lease, of they retain a fee simple absolute in possession (i.e. the freehold)?
yes, because even though they are no psychically in possession of the property, possession includes being entitled to the “receipt of rents or profits.” So, even if the property is leased out and occupied by a tenant, the landlord is still considered “in possession” because they receive rent or other income from the property
what is a reversion?
also called a reversionary interest
This is the name of the landlord’s interest when a lease is granted.
The term “reversion” reflects that the landlord retains certain rights and the property will revert to them when the lease ends. This entitles the landlord to:
(a) Receive Rent or Profits:
The tenant pays rent (or provides other benefits like profits) to the landlord as agreed under the lease terms.
(b) Retake Possession:
Once the lease term ends, the tenant no longer has a legal right to occupy the property, and the landlord is entitled to regain full physical possession.
what are the formalities for a lease for more than 3 years to be legal?
A deed (which meets the requirements of s1 LPMPA) is required to create a legal lease
what are the formalities for a lease for 3 years or less to be legal?
if the lease meets the requirements to be a parol lease, there are no requirements:
o The lease must be for three years or less
o The lease must take effect in possession (i.e. the tenant must have an immediate right to possess and enjoy the land)
o The tenant must pay market rent (i.e. the best rent that can be reasonably obtained)
o The landlord must not charge a fine or premium
the lease could even be created orally
what are the requirements for a parol lease?
o The lease must be for three years or less
o The lease must take effect in possession (i.e. the tenant must have an immediate right to possess and enjoy the land)
o The tenant must pay market rent (i.e. the best rent that can be reasonably obtained)
o The landlord must not charge a fine or premium
when will an equitable lease arise?
equity can step in and recognise a lease in equity where either:
o a contract was used to create the lease (rather than a deed); or
o a deed was used but it was invalid
if there is a contract (which includes all the agreed terms) that is signed and in writing, the claimant has clean hands and the remedy of specific performance is available, the courts will recognise the lease in equity (Walsh v Lonsdale Doctrine)
what is not necessary for there to be a lease?
payment of rent, albeit this supports that parties intended to create a formal relationship of landlord and tenant
what are the three requirements of a lease?
o The estate must be for a duration permitted for a leasehold estate
o The grant must give exclusive possession
o The grant must have the correct formalities (i.e. by deed or be a parol lease)
why are the requirements of a lease important?
because if all three elements are present, a lease will exist, even if the agreement is called a ‘licence’
Conversely, if one of those elements is missing, then there will be a licence and not a lease.
what type of right does a lease give the tenant?
a proprietary right in the land that can bind the purchaser of the reversion
what type of right does a license give the licensee?
it only give a personal right, this does not bind the purchaser of a the reversion
what is the position in relation to assignment of a lease and licence?
a lease can be assigned to a new tenant and the lease will continue to exist
a licence cannot be assigned and a new licence is required if the identity of one of the parties changes
how are leaseholders and licence holders protected?
a leaseholder benefits from lots of statutory protections, a licenceholder doesn’t
re: requirements of a lease
explain ‘permitted duration’
- The lease must have a fixed ascertainable period (i.e. a definable beginning and end)
- The lease may be for a fixed term or periodic
- a break clause in a lease does not prevent the lease from being for a fixed period
re: requirements of a lease
what happens if someone tries to create a lease for life?
this creates a lease for a term of 90 years which ends on the death of the tenant (or otherwise provided for in an agreement)
re: requirements of a lease
give an example where the duration of a lease was held to be void
where the lease was ‘for the duration of WW2’. This was not for a fixed ascertainable period and so was void.
re: requirements of a lease
what is a break clause?
a contractual right to bring the lease to a premature end
re: requirements of a lease
what is meant by ‘exclusive possession’?
Exclusive possession is the ability of the tenant to exercise control over the land, this includes being able to exclude all (inc. the landlord) from the land
The tenant need not be in occupation of the land to have exclusive possession.
i.e. does the tenant have general control of the property?
re: requirements of a lease
what effect does a statement that exclusive possession is not given have?
this will not necessarily prevent a lease from being created if the reality of the matter is that they do have exclusive possession
re: requirements of a lease
does the landlord having a key negate exclusive possession?
No. The key question is whether the they have general control.