learning written language Flashcards

1
Q

orthography

A

written language

-have to map symbol onto corresponding unit of sound

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what will affect your ability to read?

A

you have to know what the visual symbol represents

logographc –> alphabetic –> orthographic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

logographic

A

arbitrary link and reliance on visual cues

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

alphabetic

A

read using letter sounds - decoding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

orthographc

A

can recognise morphemes and words

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Gough + tunmer 1986 - simple view

A

reading comprehension is product of 2 skills
read to understand message
- how fluent depends on how quickly transform into sound

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Scarborough 2001

A

reading rope

  • reciprocal relationship word recog + language compregension
  • more you read more vocab increases
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

alphabetic principle

A

to decode - have to understand words made of phonemes

-learning letter sounds - decoding - hold in STM - blend together

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Transparency

A

decoding complicated by words island - dont conform to letter mapping sound rules

english is opaque/deep orthography - complicated by lots of words that dont follow rules

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Caravolas 2013 - cross linguistic studies

A

english, spanish, Czec - vary transparancy

  • rate of early reading slower in english
  • PA less important in english, RAN more importat
  • when only english instuction learning alphabet = similar reading
  • when instruction for others - sudden spurt
  • slower growth english

-initial reading predicted by PA, LSK, RAN (LSK less english)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

predictors of decoding

A

reading = read word silent + select correct picture

  • phoneme awareness
  • rapid automatised naming
  • letter sound knowledge
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

PA

A

phoneme isolation

phoneme blending

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

RAN

A

show matric + ask to name as fast as possible - turn visual symbol to verbal label

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

LSK

A

provide sounds for visual letters

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Hulme 2012

A

intervention to promote LSK + PA

- improved reading

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

mediation analysis

A

increases in literacy FULLY caused by increases in LSK and PA

17
Q

slight word reading

A

automatically recognise words
non word reading tests - cant rely on experience

skilled reader - orthographic learning

18
Q

Share 1995 - self teaching hypotheiss

A

children teach selves via decoding - creates connection between spoken + written (orthographic mapping)

  • asked to read novel word in context several times - tested whether leart using choice task
  • learnt quickly
  • ability to decode novel word correlated with learning written form
  • spelling practice improves OL
19
Q

irregular words

A

partially decided + use context
L-DRC model - semantics + lexical info

knowing spoken form of Irreg predictor of reading, knowing meaning wasnt
knowing meaning, not spoken was predictor

20
Q

training studies

A

phonological + semantic pre training – better aloud novel irregular words than phon alone

21
Q

Wang

A

compared phonological training to phon/semantic
- should teach both before showing visual

activation of correct pronunciation receives boost by activation of phon + semantic info learnt pre-training

22
Q

bridged inference

A

have to get info from different areas of text

23
Q

elaborative inference

A

dont haev to make to understand but can do with info

24
Q

lexical legacy hypothesis

A

key is reading experience - makes high quality representations
-frees resources for comprehension

25
Q

Rawson 2005

construction-integration model

A

linguistic - how put words together + understand
microstructure - build sentences to phrases
macrostructure - overall gist

26
Q

development

A

younger - focus building orthographic lexicon - decoding + recognising
older - how well understand in spoken form

27
Q

reading systems framework

A

knowledge - linguistic, ortho, general
processes that you apply - decoding, meaning retrieval, inferencing
cognitive system - processing resources

28
Q

hhigher level processes

A

inference making
WM and inhibition
attention allocation

29
Q

inference making

A

critical for coherence

anaphoric inference - have to work out who “he” is referring to and “them”

30
Q

necessary inferences

A

cohesive - text based
coherence - knowledge based
combo - of text + knowledge
elaborative - knowledge

31
Q

Cain 1999

A

CAM design - older group poor comprehension vs younger typical
-older group less skilled at inferences

lower skills feed into monitoring + inference making

32
Q

working memory

A

determines how much info can be kept active - have to keep active to inference

33
Q

attention allocation

A

involved in comprehension monitoring

  • poor attention:
  • less suscrptile to motor compregension
  • more susceptible distracted by detail
  • more difficulty detecting break in coherence
34
Q

Clarke 2010

Read me project

A

compared 3 types of intervention

  • oral language
  • text comprehension
  • both

all led to reading comprehension gains
-oral language best - boosted vocab